Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday slammed the Congress-led Opposition in the Lok Sabha during the debate on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Fireworks on the floor of the Lok Sabha, 8 hours ago, the bill, the Waqf Amendment Bill
00:06was tabled in the Lok Sabha by Kiran Rajiju called the Umeed Bill and slammed right now
00:13opposition there by none else but one of the architects of the Waqf Amendment Bill.
00:20Amit Shah went on to speak for 40 minutes supporting the Waqf Amendment Bill.
00:28Amit Shah made the charge at the opposition saying that the opposition, Congress mainly
00:34spreading misinformation, stop spreading misinformation on the bill was a charge of the Home Minister
00:42and he also went on to say that the bill is not going to stem the rights of anyone at
00:48all but only end corruption.
00:52Attacking the Congress on multiple fronts suggesting the same amount of fear mongering
00:57was done at the time of triple talaq bill and exactly the same thing is happening where
01:03the Waqf Amendment Bill is concerned.
01:08More so suggesting that this bill will only stem corruption and will be good when it
01:12comes down to the Muslims of the country.
01:15Let's listen in to one of the architects of the Waqf Amendment Bill, Home Minister Amit Shah.
01:27Home Minister Amit Shah.
01:57Home Minister Amit Shah.
02:27Home Minister Amit Shah.
02:57Home Minister Amit Shah.
03:27Home Minister Amit Shah.
03:57Home Minister Amit Shah.
04:28Home Minister Amit Shah.
04:33That was the Home Minister Amit Shah speaking on the floor of the Lok Sabha supporting the Waqf Amendment Bill.
04:38Earlier today when the bill was tabled by the Minority Affairs Minister Kiran Rijiju,
04:43the Deputy Leader of Opposition, Deputy LOP, Godav Gogoi, Congress MP stood up rebutting
04:51Kiran Rijiju point by point.
04:53Listen in.
04:55Section 107, on and from the commencement of the Waqf Amendment Act 2025,
05:03the Limitation Act 1963 shall apply to any proceedings.
05:09Sir, no matter how many times you go into history,
05:14every time, because this Waqf, this process,
05:18this process has been going on since the time Islam came into our country.
05:23There are many graves where there are no papers,
05:28but there is judgement.
05:30Judgement is on their side.
05:32And today, again and again, we have said that the Limitation Act should be increased.
05:37Because this is a practical problem.
05:41But today they don't want it.
05:43Why?
05:44Because they want that in different corners of the country,
05:47cases should be filed here, there, here.
05:50So whatever is the environment of brotherhood here,
05:53they want to break that environment of brotherhood.
05:56This is their political objective.
05:58Read clause 26, section 52A.
06:02Section 52, clause 26.
06:09What is written in clause 26?
06:12In section 52A of the Principle Act, in subsection 1,
06:18for the words rigorous imprisonment, the words imprisonment shall be substituted.
06:25They are diluting it.
06:27The Parent Act said that there should be rigorous imprisonment.
06:31And if you are repeatedly saying that this and that is happening,
06:37then why are you weakening the clause?
06:40It is just a delusion, sir.
06:42Their objective is elsewhere.
06:45Sir, I would also like to give a tip,
06:48that today they are looking at the land of a particular society,
06:54tomorrow they will be looking at the land of other minorities.
07:24All right, let's quickly cut across to our panelists this evening.
07:26We are going to continue to cut into the Lok Sabha and the speakers.
07:30Right now, RLD MP is speaking, Rajkumar Sanghwan,
07:38and RLD, an ally of the NDA, has pledged support for the Waqf Bill.
07:45Tuhin Sinha, National Spokesperson, BJP.
07:47Dr. Pooja Tripathi, National Spokesperson, Congress.
07:50Anjum Ara, Spokesperson, JDU.
07:52Pradeep Bhatti, Spokesperson, Samajwadi Party.
07:55And Deepak Reddy, Gunapathi National Spokesperson, TDP.
07:58I want to immediately cut across to the Congress Spokesperson first.
08:01Pooja Tripathi, we heard the Home Minister a short while ago,
08:05and it was a very concerted, pointed attack,
08:08especially where your own political outfit, Congress, is concerned,
08:11accusing you of, one, spreading misinformation,
08:14two, once again resorting to the politics of appeasement
08:17by fair mongering in a community,
08:19by suggesting that this bill is not going to go in their favour.
08:24Preeti, good evening to all.
08:25It's ironical that Bharatiya Janata Party couldn't find a Muslim MP
08:29to introduce the bill that talks about the minority development.
08:32And when you call it ummeed, I think it's a unna ummeed
08:35because it works against the constitutional safeguards
08:37of Article 25, 26, and the principle of federalism,
08:41that's the basic structure of constitution.
08:43It's now ummeed because it's a thin-veiled attempt
08:46to encroach upon the illegal encroachment of the Waqf properties.
08:50And that's why, you know, you just mentioned Gaurav Gogoi,
08:54and when you talk about fair mongering,
08:56let me tell you, let me put the record straight,
08:58Congress is not against reforms, Congress is not against amendments,
09:02but the way they introduced it in JPC,
09:05they didn't discuss it clause by clause,
09:06they just bulldozed it through JPC.
09:08The 44 amendments that were suggested by the opposition members
09:12were not included, and when there was hue and cry,
09:15they were later redacted into the bill draft.
09:18And that speaks volumes of how fraudulently they want to go ahead
09:22with every bill of the country.
09:24You know, Gaurav Gogoi actually gave a point-to-point rebuttal
09:27where he talked about Clause 3A,
09:29where who will get to decide who is the practicing Muslims for five years.
09:33Now you'll start giving certificates to practicing Muslims
09:35that you have been practicing for 4.5 years or five years.
09:39Then they have, you know, they have been raising this huge propaganda
09:42that it includes women.
09:44I remember Congress leader, the Rajya Sabha MP, IC Rehman,
09:49who was the Central Work Council member
09:51when he was the Central Work Council chairman.
09:54There were two women members in both the Central Work Council and state tribunals.
09:59And so this goes, this has no air.
10:01You know, we're also going to start introducing the clock.
10:03I'm going to ask our producers to pull out the clock, two minutes each.
10:06Toheen Sinha, I want to get you into this conversation.
10:08The fact is, there was a point that, you know,
10:11the Congress spokesperson made.
10:13The intention is very clear because you can't even get a minority
10:18in terms, of course, you had Kiran Rajiju, the Minority Affairs Minister,
10:22who tabled the bill, but a Muslim MP in the House
10:25to actually moot the Waqf bill, number one.
10:28Number two, that you're violating constitution at every level
10:32is a charge which was made on the floor of the House
10:34by speakers across the board from the opposition,
10:37be it a Gaurav Gogoi and, you know, the other MPs that followed.
10:41Good evening, Preeti. Good evening, everybody.
10:44You know, the Congress representative's charge that we couldn't find
10:48a Muslim leader or Muslim MP to introduce the bill
10:51is as bizarre as Gaurav Gogoi saying that, you know,
10:55we don't give the rights to Muslims to offer namaz on the roads.
10:58I mean, if you have heard Gaurav Gogoi, that's what he rooted for,
11:01offering namaz on the roads.
11:03Point is, a Buddhist minister introducing the bill
11:07is also a member of the minority community.
11:10But, of course, for the Congress party, you know, Buddhists and Jains
11:13and Sikhs don't constitute minority because they're obsessed with one minority.
11:17Now, the point is, today is a landmark day in India's parliamentary history.
11:22This legislation, you know, undoes, it basically neutralizes
11:28the ill effects of the unconstitutional amendments brought about in 1995,
11:33particularly Section 40, which gave unbridled powers to the Waqf board
11:38to, you know, to aggrandize, to acquire property
11:42without, you know, conforming to the tenets of law.
11:46And if you look at the amendments, some of the very specific amendments,
11:49you know, basically neutralize that overreaching,
11:52that overriding powers of the Waqf, be it the removal of the Muslim cleric
11:57from the tribunal, which made it, which made the entire tribunal very lopsided.
12:01You know, today, with the passage of this bill,
12:05in the next couple of hours, and then tomorrow in the Rajya Sabha,
12:09people will have the right to approach courts of law within 90 days
12:13after a Waqf acquisition, which was not there.
12:17So I think it's a landmark bill, but again, but of course,
12:19the Congress party was obsessed with gifting land away.
12:22And as Honorable Home Minister rightly pointed out,
12:25after the introduction of the, you know, spurious amendment in 1995,
12:29the acquisition of Waqf had gone up exponentially.
12:33Besides, who would have a problem with digitization of records?
12:36Who would have a problem with proper accounting?
12:38Who would have a problem with proper, you know, monitoring of these things?
12:42So I think, you know, the Congress intention is palatial.
12:45All right, so your time is up. You know, what we're also going to do is,
12:47we're going to try and stick to the merits of the Waqf Amendment Bill
12:50instead of political rhetoric, because then it will at least supplement
12:54with what's going on in Parliament right now.
12:57You know, Tuhin Sinha, you made the claim that yes, 100%,
13:00it's going to have easy passage in the Lok Sabha.
13:02Each and every ally of the NDA has come together to support the bill.
13:06And however, what happens in Rajya Sabha tomorrow remains to be seen
13:11when the bill is going to be tabled, when it's tabled.
13:14But I want to bring in Pradeep Bhatti, spokesperson, Samajwadi Party.
13:17The charge, Pradeep Bhatti, is very clear.
13:19Fear mongering by the likes of your party, by the likes of Congress
13:23to instill a sense of othering when it comes down to the Muslims of India,
13:28while as per the Home Minister and the NDA,
13:31this bill will only help in a cohesive growth of the Muslim community.
13:37Thank you and good evening to all.
13:39First of all, this mindset of calling a 14% population of this country
13:44a bezare to have them in the Parliament, this mindset needs to be defeated.
13:49So I strongly object on that.
13:51Irony is that the party which has zero presence in the Parliament Muslim representation
13:59is talking about giving them justice in terms of this work bill.
14:05They are spreading nothing but hatred and division in the society
14:09and diversion of the core issues.
14:11BJP claim of bringing this bill for the welfare of the poor Muslims
14:16and the underprivileged Muslims.
14:19Let me ask them, the votes you got from the underprivileged OBCs for the caste census,
14:25when you are going to do that?
14:27The people who are calling or identifying the people of this community from their clothes
14:35and calling them as the snatchers of Mangalsutra,
14:39now became the survivors of the same community.
14:42So these mindsets need to be defeated.
14:45The main core issues about the main basis of this work bill is the structure and administration issues,
14:52the legal and judicial concerns and the operational issues.
14:56Let me tell BJP spokesperson, if you want to start with the basics,
15:01let's start with the land dispute.
15:03In the civil courts, 66% of all the cases are on the land disputes,
15:10which goes into lakhs.
15:13So what you have done for that?
15:15You are talking about the corruption or bringing transparency.
15:19Who can give you a better example that every department of the government
15:24and every state government of yours is rampant, indulging into the corruption
15:31and every department is indulging into that.
15:34And you are the party you are calling that you will bring the black money in 100 days
15:40Sir, your time is up, your fader is going to go down.
15:42I'll come back to you when your two minutes start again.
15:44Deepak Reddy, Gunapathi, National Spokesperson, TDP, has come out in strong support
15:48of the Waqf Amendment Bill standing by your ally.
15:51Would you like to give us the merits of the bill and why the TDP has decided to support
15:56the Waqf Amendment Bill?
15:58Or you are very keen that the amendments that you had put forth be included
16:03because they will be voting on the amendments as well.
16:07A very good evening to everybody, ma'am.
16:09In fact, Chandrababu Naidu ji has been very active and he was looking into
16:17the aspects of this bill and talking to all our leaders till late midnight last night.
16:22And today he has spoken to all the minority leaders in Andhra Pradesh via phone,
16:27via teleconferencing to actually tell them the facts about the bill.
16:33Congress Party and the Indy ecosystem especially has given out so much of
16:38negative information and trying to instigate the Muslim community from across the country.
16:45It is really shameful that they have stooped down to such levels.
16:49And from Telugu Desham Party, we are proud to say that we were one of the first
16:54to say that we need a JPC and we need to go into the details.
16:58And we have suggested three amendments which we thought were very crucial
17:03to protect the rights of the Muslims.
17:06Especially the Waqf-e-Jazeer and by that we can protect all the properties
17:13which are being claimed by the Waqf Board.
17:15One thing I would like to bring on record, ma'am.
17:18The Congress and the Indy ecosystem does so much of drama
17:21but we have done the math in Andhra Pradesh.
17:23There are totally 66,783 acres under the Waqf Board.
17:29Out of that 31,595 acres are illegally occupied just in the last five years.
17:36If the previous act was so good, how come 50% of the land belonging to Muslims
17:42in Andhra Pradesh has been illegally occupied by others?
17:45So there was a problem.
17:47And Chandra Babu Naidu ji wanted to address this problem.
17:51And we have taken the consent of all the Muslim community leaders in Andhra Pradesh.
17:56So they had one concern.
17:58They didn't want a non-Muslim to be in that board.
18:00But in the state of Andhra Pradesh, we are going to examine ways
18:04to protect that particular demand of the Muslim community also.
18:08All right. I'm going to come back to you and I'm going to ask you
18:10on those three amendments that you had proposed,
18:13will the TDP still be there or will insist on all those three amendments
18:18that the TDP posed?
18:20Anjumara, your leader Lallan Singh has supported the bill today.
18:25He has clearly said that the opposition is getting more involved in fear-mongering
18:32and is encouraging people, the minority community, the Muslims,
18:36that this bill is not right for them.
18:38Why is the JDU supporting it today?
18:42Look, this bill is about transparency, transparency, administrative reform
18:48and at the same time, it is covering the responsibility.
18:52At the same time, let me tell you one thing that when this bill came,
18:56in Bihar, in front of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar,
19:00all the leaders of the social organization or religious gurus,
19:04they met and put their doubts and concerns in front of him.
19:09They put those doubts and concerns in front of our JPC's Honourable Member,
19:14Honourable Member of Parliament, Dilshad Dilshad Kamat ji.
19:19When this bill came to Patal, we are definitely happy about it.
19:23And one more thing I will say, this bill must be looked at without any prejudice
19:27and without any bias.
19:29Look, everyone talks about women empowerment.
19:32Women have also been God's creation.
19:35But you think that since Islam has come to India,
19:38but there was no existence of women's empowerment anywhere.
19:41It is a matter of belief.
19:43For whom is this wealth given?
19:46What has Allah said?
19:47Allah has said that this wealth will be used for the poor, the oppressed,
19:50for the poor, for the widows, for the helpless people, for the poor classes.
19:57But the way corruption has been spreading on the wealth of time,
20:01you must have seen that a video was going viral very quickly in the morning.
20:05It was the Honourable Chief Minister of that time, Lalu Prasad Yadav ji.
20:08It was a video from 2010.
20:10The President is saying very strongly that you have brought this bill.
20:13It is a very light bill.
20:14Let's pass it.
20:15But there is a need to bring hard bills on waqf.
20:18And he had counted that at that time,
20:20the prime located in Patna, the land that is being waqfed,
20:23has been occupied by all the dabbangs.
20:26So this ends corruption.
20:28And at the same time, all political parties talk about social justice.
20:32But I feel sad to say this,
20:34when apart from Muslims,
20:36other than the community,
20:37everyone talks about social justice with strength.
20:40But when it comes to social justice among Muslims,
20:43they step back.
20:45Your time is up, Anjum ji.
20:48I will come to you again for two minutes.
20:50But I want to cut across right now before we start another round
20:54where I will give each of the spokespersons two minutes each
20:57to put their views, their party's views
21:00and why they oppose or support this particular bill.
21:03Listen in to what went down in Parliament.
21:05The Minority Affairs Minister, Kiran Rijiju,
21:08tabled the bill in Lok Sabha.
21:11Then opposition came in from the ranks of the India Alliance.
21:15Listen in to Kiran Rijiju and then Imran Masood from the Congress.
21:19They say that in our country,
21:22the land bank is the third largest by the work board.
21:29First the Indian Railway,
21:32then the Indian Army,
21:34that is, the Indian Defence,
21:36and then they say that the work board has land.
21:39I want to change that.
21:41Sir, you also travel by train, we also travel by train.
21:45There are thousands of kilometres of railway tracks and stations.
21:49Those railway tracks and stations are not the property of the country.
21:53They are the property of the country.
21:55The property of the country is private property.
21:58That is why in the world,
22:01India has the largest amount of time property.
22:08Not just in our country,
22:10India has the largest amount of time property in the world.
22:14So why is that?
22:16You have been in government for 60 years.
22:18Why are Muslims so poor in our country?
22:21When the world has the largest amount of time property in our country,
22:26then why has our poor Muslims not worked for education,
22:29medical treatment,
22:31skilling,
22:32income generation?
22:34Why has it not worked so far?
22:36This is the world's largest...
22:38Let's cut across to Samajwadi Party speaker,
22:40one of the youngest MPs in Parliament,
22:42Ikra Chaudhary, who is speaking,
22:45represents a constituency from West Delhi.
22:49Listen in.
22:50What is work by user?
22:51It means that if a property has been used for good and good deeds for years,
22:57then it will be considered as a devotee.
22:59The courts of India have also accepted this.
23:03Work by user is not a special gift that only the work board has received.
23:07It is the right of all other religious trusts,
23:10on the basis of tradition and use,
23:12without any documentation,
23:14to declare their religious character.
23:17In article 13 clause 3 of the constitution of India,
23:21custom and usage are provided by the law.
23:25This article has also made work by user.
23:29If this bill becomes law,
23:31the work board will wash their hands of this provision,
23:34but this provision will continue for other religious trusts.
23:38This is a direct violation of articles 14 and 15 of the constitution of India,
23:43which, on the basis of religion and caste,
23:45stresses the equality of all in the face of discrimination and law.
23:49I would also like to say that the people of power,
23:52who are patting each other on the back,
23:55that the amendment of work by user has been accepted,
23:59but their mischief is that
24:01a provision has been included along with it,
24:05on the basis of which it has been said that
24:07if the property of any devotee is disputed,
24:10then they will lose their devotee status.
24:12So, the amendment that they have given,
24:14which has been accepted,
24:16has no meaning.
24:18This is their intention, which is being made clear.
24:21Suhaga has done one more thing on gold.
24:23The government has removed section 107 of the law of devotee,
24:28and there is a provision in the limitation act
24:30to go to court against someone for 12 years.
24:33In section 107, the board had got relief from the limitation act.
24:38The devotee board could have gone to court against the illegal occupiers at any time.
24:42If this section is not there,
24:44then the illegal occupiers can take advantage of the legal process
24:48and seize the property of the devotee.
24:50If this limitation act is not applied to other religious trusts,
24:57then why is this step-by-step procedure being done with the devotee board?
25:00Why is duality policy being adopted on the basis of religion?
25:04If section 107 and devotee by user are read together,
25:09then lakhs of devotees' property will be seized.
25:12Therefore, this bill is not for the welfare of Muslims,
25:15but to eliminate their existence and heritage.
25:18There are many religious trusts in India,
25:22in which people of that particular religion are involved and they make arrangements.
25:27And this is understandable,
25:29because the person who can understand the tradition of his religion well,
25:33no other religious person can understand it.
25:36According to article 26 clause 2,
25:39the religious community has the right to the administration of its religious institutions.
25:43But this is done in reverse about the devotee board.
25:46Sir, two minutes.
25:48Sir, please two minutes.
25:49The government is considering it as a secular body,
25:52and is saying to include non-Muslims in it.
25:55It felt good to hear the words of secularism from your mouth,
25:58but the next first illusion breaks,
26:01because you have put the clause of practicing Muslims only to donate,
26:07but there is no clause of being a Muslim to sit on the board.
26:11So this clearly shows your duality policy.
26:15This is the same government that wrote in Ram Jan Bhoomi Trust,
26:18that even if there is a district officer, it should be a Hindu.
26:22Someone tell me why there is no secularism there.
26:26Sir, before I finish my talk,
26:29the issue of women is being raised again and again.
26:32The government says that it will give representation to Muslim women on the board.
26:37Before this law, Muslim women have been members of the board,
26:41and there was a provision of minimum 2, it could have been more than that.
26:45Sir, I want to say that what new work has the government done for women,
26:50which is being beaten by every member of the government.
26:53If a Muslim woman had supported this, you would have believed her.
26:59But unfortunately, in such a long queue, not a single Muslim woman is seen.
27:04Sir, I am a Muslim woman myself.
27:10Sir, I am a minority woman.
27:14There are only two women in this house.
27:16And because of that, I want to say that
27:19through this bill, Muslim women are not getting anything.
27:22They don't want to give us anything.
27:24They just want to make tokenism in our name and put it in a narrative media.
27:29So this bill is not for the good of Muslims, but to erase their identity.
27:34Sir, in the end, I just want to say that
27:37only the names will remain in the prison of documents.
27:40Those who were ours will only remain in the claim.
27:43To make the taste of sweet Eid bitter through this bill,
27:46this was the real gift of Modi.
27:52Right, the fiery debates continue on the floor of the house.
27:55Let's cut across to our panelists.
27:56Once again, I'm going to allot you two minutes each to put your party's point forward
28:00on why you have opposed or supported this bill.
28:04Dr. Pooja Tripathi, you heard your panelists earlier make your case.
28:07Two minutes start now.
28:10I want to just show this photo to my fellow BJP spokesperson
28:15where he said that there was nothing, no directive against Namaz on roads.
28:18Your minister of state, JN Chaudhary, had called this UP government directive
28:22as Orwellian in nature.
28:24So I think you should brush your, but I'll come to the debate.
28:26And then Ikra was brilliant in her speech.
28:29And she raised across points of how this is just a tokenism
28:32and in the form of women empowerment.
28:34Now the point they have been raising is the transparency and accountability.
28:38Transparency, they have been raising voice about digitization, digitization.
28:42Mukhtar Abbas, you know, in the last Rajya Sabha session,
28:46he said that 99.9% of digitization of property has been completed.
28:51And why do you want to move to Wamsi portal?
28:53We have seen when we are moving to a new system,
28:56as we have seen in demonetization, it never leaves any result.
29:00It just backfires on you.
29:02And when you talk about Section 52A, Clause 26,
29:05earlier it was the encroachment without documentation
29:08was a non-bailable serious criminal offense.
29:11It has been diluted to a bailable criminal offense.
29:13And then you talk about, you know, you're reforming the whole Waqf Amendment Act.
29:17Clause 44 has taken away the state powers to regulate the state boards.
29:22On the Section 83.9, earlier it was there that High Court can turn around
29:26the acceptance and, you know, the rejection of Waqf property.
29:30And you can always appear to the tribunal, appeal to the tribunal.
29:33And now Section 97, the earlier Act had central government can override
29:37the state government and the High Court and ask on the status of Waqf properties.
29:42Gaurav Gogoi very, you know, rightly asked,
29:45how many times the government has put in Section 97,
29:49you know, they today discussed that even parliament has been claimed
29:52by Waqf as a Waqf property.
29:54How many times they have revoked Section 97 and asked the Waqf properties
29:59that what is your documentation?
30:01What is your validity to claim this property as yours?
30:05Nothing. It's just human rights, just propaganda.
30:08This is the same Bharatiya Janata Party spokesperson.
30:11Your time is up. Two minutes are up.
30:13Tuhin Sinha, please respond. Your two minutes start now.
30:18You know, Preeti, a lot of questions are being repeatedly hurled at us.
30:22So let me, you know, very pointedly address those questions.
30:25Number one, why are Hindus being included?
30:28Please understand that there is a difference between a temple management body
30:32and the Waqf board, which is a real estate management body.
30:35You know, the Waqf board is not even a religious body in that sense.
30:39It is a purely administrative body.
30:41And when you have the claims of land, you know, being made against members
30:46of other communities, and I have given you multiple examples,
30:50Tiruchendurai in Tamil Nadu, where a 1500-year-old temple exists.
30:54That entire village has been claimed by the Waqf board.
30:57A village in Haryana, where a 400-year-old Gurudwara exists,
31:02that temple, that village has been claimed by the Waqf board.
31:05You know, there is a similar dispute going on in Kerala,
31:08where land belonging to the Christian community has been claimed by the Waqf board.
31:12So in this situation, it is an imperative to include members
31:16of the other community whose lands are being regularly claimed
31:21and, you know, sometimes usurped.
31:23Number two, you know, they say, they always grudge or claim
31:27that this is in the interest of the poor Muslims,
31:29but the fact is that there are some 10,000 litigations,
31:33which have been, there are 10,000 legal cases which have been filed
31:37by Muslims against the operations, against the management of the Waqf board,
31:41and many of these include some of the influential Muslim members
31:45of the Waqf board, discreetly selling properties of the Waqf
31:49and, you know, pocketing profits.
31:51So it is for the benefit of the poor and, you know, for the first time,
31:55representation in the board will be given to Pasmanda Muslims,
31:58Agha Khan, you know, Muslims belonging to the Agha Khan community,
32:02Bohra community, all of these had been left behind.
32:05And once again, I come to the basic thing, reforms need to be celebrated.
32:10Why does the Congress party, you know, in such situations,
32:13pretend to be even more radical than the Muslim League?
32:16That is the moot question, because Congress's concerns are completely unfounded.
32:20Your, well, you've ended dot on time.
32:23You know, I'm going to give the two minutes to our other guests as well,
32:26but before that, listen in on what's happening on the floor of the Parliament,
32:29a fiery face-off, of course, you know, two very different speeches.
32:33You had Ravi Shankar Prasad and you have Akhilesh Yadav. Listen in.
32:43I'm going to give the two minutes to our other guests as well,
32:46but before that, listen in on what's happening on the floor of the Parliament,
32:49a fiery face-off, of course, you know, two very different speeches.
32:52You had Ravi Shankar Prasad and you have Akhilesh Yadav. Listen in.
32:55I'm going to give the two minutes to our other guests as well,
32:58but before that, listen in on what's happening on the floor of the Parliament,
33:01a fiery face-off, of course, you know, two very different speeches.
33:04You had Ravi Shankar Prasad and you have Akhilesh Yadav. Listen in.
33:07I'm going to give the two minutes to our other guests as well,
33:10but before that, listen in on what's happening on the floor of the Parliament,
33:13a fiery face-off, of course, you know, two very different speeches.
33:16You had Ravi Shankar Prasad and you have Akhilesh Yadav. Listen in on what's happening on the floor of the Parliament,
33:19a fiery face-off, of course, you know, two very different speeches.
33:22You had Ravi Shankar Prasad and you have Akhilesh Yadav. Listen in on what's happening on the floor of the Parliament,
33:25a fiery face-off, of course, you know, two very different speeches.
33:28You had Ravi Shankar Prasad and you have Akhilesh Yadav. Listen in on what's happening on the floor of the Parliament,
33:31a fiery face-off, of course, you know, two very different speeches.
33:34Deepak Reddy, Gunapati, your two minutes begin now.
33:37Deepak Reddy, Gunapati, your two minutes begin now.
33:40The question that I asked you earlier, you had asked for three amendments.
33:43Has they been taken into the draft which could be adopted by the end of day in Lok Sabha?
33:46Has they been taken into the draft which could be adopted by the end of day in Lok Sabha?
33:49Ma'am, our Chief Minister, I mean, has personally directed our MPs to insist on this.
33:52Ma'am, our Chief Minister, I mean, has personally directed our MPs to insist on this.
33:55Ma'am, our Chief Minister, I mean, has personally directed our MPs to insist on this.
33:58Ma'am, our Chief Minister, I mean, has personally directed our MPs to insist on this.
34:01The lands which are there already under the WAF board have to be protected.
34:04So, the WAF by user clause is something what we have suggested.
34:07So, the WAF by user clause is something what we have suggested.
34:10So, by that, we can protect the existing lands which are already there under the boards.
34:13So, that's a success.
34:16The second one is, rather than a collector, we wanted a higher level officer
34:19because the collector might not have that kind of a time
34:22and a higher level officer cannot be influenced even by the state government.
34:25So, this is the second amendment which was accepted, which is a success from our side.
34:28So, this is the second amendment which was accepted, which is a success from our side.
34:31And the third is the timeline.
34:34We have suggested the six months timeline so that justice can be done.
34:37You cannot be left behind only on the basis of time.
34:40What's important here is, in Andhra Pradesh, we have, like the past month,
34:43a few sects in Muslims, like Dudaikala and Pinjara,
34:46a few sects in Muslims, like Dudaikala and Pinjara,
34:49which is majority of the percentage of the Muslim population,
34:52but they are living in absolute poverty.
34:55They are not getting the benefits.
34:58So, we are looking into all these aspects also.
35:01And Chandra Babu Naidu ji, just about three days ago,
35:04has vowed to protect the vast lands.
35:07So, here, there is a lot of negativity and misinformation being spread by the Indy ecosystem.
35:10So, here, there is a lot of negativity and misinformation being spread by the Indy ecosystem.
35:13And we are proud that the Muslims of Andhra Pradesh have not listened to all that nonsense
35:16And we are proud that the Muslims of Andhra Pradesh have not listened to all that nonsense
35:19and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:22and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:25and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:28and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:31and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:34and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:37and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:40and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:43and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:46and they have not been instigated and they still stand by TDP
35:49What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
35:52What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
35:55What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
35:58What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:01What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:04What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:07What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:10What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:13What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:16What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:19What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:22What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:25What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:28What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:31What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:34What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:37What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:40What are the efforts which have been put in by the TDP party and how we are protecting the rights
36:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
36:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
36:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
36:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
36:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
36:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
37:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
38:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
39:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
40:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
41:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
42:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
43:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
44:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:37I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:40I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:43I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:46I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:49I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:52I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:55I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
45:58I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:01I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:04I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:07I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:10I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:13I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:16I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:19I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:22I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:25I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:28I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:31I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective
46:34I would like to say that the suggestions that we have given are retrospective and not prospective