• 2 days ago
At last Tuesday's Senate Intel Committee hearing, Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS) questioned Defense Intelligence Agency Director Jeffrey Kruse and CIA Director John Ratcliffe about the Russia-Ukraine War.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank You Mr. Chairman and thank you to our witnesses for being here. I want to
00:04explore a little bit about Ukraine and I'll direct this to Director Ratcliffe
00:08or Director Cruz. The ATA assesses that quote the grinding war of attrition in
00:14Ukraine quote will lead to a gradual but steady erosion of Kiev's positions on
00:19the battlefield. Are Ukrainian forces at any significant risk of collapse this
00:25year? Before I turn it over to Director Ratcliffe I think both sides are working
00:37through the equipment that they need the industrial base they need to support
00:40that and the personnel that are required to man all of that equipment and man the
00:44front lines and as we see the battle space in the various portions whether
00:49it's in Kursk whether it's in any of the four oblasts we see areas where Kiev
00:56will struggle to prevent the slow attritional grind. We do not see an
01:02imminent collapse in any of the line of control battle spaces at this point. And
01:08then vice versa that that answers my question unless you want to add
01:11something Director. Whatever advantages in manpower and material they have can
01:20Russia maintain its operational tempo without significant changes to how it's
01:24conducting the war? I think our assessment from a military perspective
01:30is that Russia has the ability to sustain its campaign longer than Kiev would. Now
01:37when that timeline hits we do not have an assessment of but I believe that if
01:44this were to go on for more than the remainder of this year both sides would
01:50have a significant challenge maintaining their defense industrial base as well as
01:55their operational ops tempo. Longer than this year? That is correct and they will
01:59each have difficulty at various points throughout the spring summer and fall as
02:04well. Thank you. Director Ratcliffe, ATA says continuing the Russia-Ukraine war
02:10perpetuates strategic risk to the United States of unintended escalation to
02:16large-scale war and heightened insecurity among NATO allies. What are
02:21the strategic risks to the United States if Russia were to achieve its maximalist
02:26objectives via peace agreement? Achieve via peace agreement? Yes. Well I think
02:35that clearly the negotiations that are going on reflect that President Trump is
02:42seeking a cessation of the war on terms that will end the war permanently from
02:47an intelligence community standpoint and specifically with regard to CIA assets
02:52we've taken steps to support that the president's goal of an enduring peace to
03:00General Cruz's comments I agree with his assessment and the generally the public
03:05assessment that Russia has the battlefield advantage is grinding
03:12forward slowly. I want to comment on that however to say that with regard to the
03:18Ukrainian resistance the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian military have
03:22been underestimated for a period of several years now and ultimately I'm
03:29convinced from my reflections in observing from an intelligence
03:35standpoint that they will fight with their bare hands if they have to if they
03:39don't have terms that are acceptable to an enduring peace. Obviously to the point
03:45of maximalist goals President Trump has communicated that he is aware of the
03:52dangers of that of Russia getting what they want and I think that the peace
03:57talks that are taking place would reflect if successful and they are
04:02making progress that both sides would not get everything that they want and no
04:09one's maximalist goals would be achieved. Thank you both. In the short time I have
04:14I'm going to skip a question and ask the that I intended to ask but ask the
04:19director of the FBI. Director I chair the subcommittee that appropriates money for
04:26the Department of Justice including the FBI. It has been our practice that the
04:31FBI director as well as the Attorney General appear before our committee each
04:36year and I would want to make certain that you do not foresee any challenges
04:43that I will have in your presence when you come to speak to when we invite you
04:49to come speak about your budget. I think when we visited in the office you made
04:53yourself often available pleased to talk to Congress. We're getting ready for the
04:58appropriations process to begin. The budget that the president intends to
05:02submit is seemingly months away, weeks away, long weeks away and we may ask you
05:09to come testify about your priorities now or sooner than that. Is that a
05:13challenge for you that I'd be aware of? From the FBI no as long as the
05:18Department of Justice and the Attorney General are good with it. Thank you.
05:21Senator Reid. Thank you very much Mr. Chairman.

Recommended