• 2 days ago
During a press briefing on the Signal group chat leak on Tuesday, Rep. Gil Cisneros (D-CA) slammed Trump officials for a Signal group chat leak detailing Yemen war plans.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00I'd like to invite up Congressman Gil Cisneros.
00:05Thank you, Derek. Thanks, everyone, for being here today and giving us this opportunity to speak
00:12to you about how bravely this is. I'm Gil Cisneros. I represent California's 31st Congressional
00:18District. I'm a Navy veteran, but also I was a former Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel
00:23Readiness, working in the Pentagon, understanding how the security of that system kind of works
00:29and how you communicate. And I can tell you this, when I was in the Pentagon, when I was
00:34the Undersecretary, never ever did we use signal to plan anything, any meetings, any coordinate,
00:41any efforts, or give away definitely any details about operations that were currently going on.
00:48Anytime you talk with the Secretary or anything, right, is at a secret level. You have, as it's
00:55been already said, right, there are devices that you had. I had multiple devices in my office
01:00that were secure on secure networks, right, and then you had your unsecured network.
01:06Any operations or anything that was going on was definitely over secure channels.
01:12And that was not happening in this. And the thing that is really bothering me about this
01:17is the fact, too, that, you know, every office pretty much in the Pentagon is a skiff. I mean,
01:23definitely the Secretary of Defense's office, but yet he's communicating on his personal cell
01:29phone. You're not supposed to be taking cell phones or Bluetooth or any of those devices
01:35into your skiff where they can be kind of tapped into and listened to and brought into that
01:41environment. There is just a complete disregard for OPSEC, you know, for operation security
01:50by this administration. And then the audacity there is that the Secretary had actually said
01:56before this, too, right, that we're going to start getting down on OPSEC, that OPSEC was tight,
02:02and they're looking into this. And he's actually talking about polygraphing,
02:06you know, people there at the Pentagon to find out where the leaks are.
02:10Well, problem solved, right there with the Secretary of Defense. He should be the first
02:16in line there. He's the one who is creating the problems. You know, OPSEC is supposed to start
02:23with him. As it's been said, too, loose lips sink ships. That was something that every seaman
02:29learns when they joined the Navy, right there at the beginning of boot camp. Nobody would have
02:33ever thought that it would start with the National Security Advisor, as well as the Secretary of
02:38Defense are the ones who kind of laid out the information of where the details of this exercise
02:43were and how it was going. And so with that, thank you very much. And now I have the honor of
02:50introducing another former Navy colleague, Jimmy Padena. Thank you.

Recommended