• 20 hours ago
During Wednesday’s House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) discussed proposed legislation regarding oversight and transparency surrounding DOGE.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you. The committee will now proceed to consideration of H.R.E.S. 127.
00:04Without objection, the measure will be considered as read and open for
00:07amendment at any point. Does anyone wish to strike the last word? Mr. Doggett.
00:14Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Though I must say your rash and misleading statement
00:18indicates your desperation in protecting those from the least bit of
00:22accountability. You don't realize that there is a big difference between truth
00:27and truth social. It's called reality and the reality is a rampage has been
00:33going on through our government. All we are asking for in this resolution is
00:37truth, facts. There is nothing in this resolution that should slow the effort
00:43if it is legitimate by Doge for a moment. Doge has confused billions and
00:50millions. It double counts its body count and it expects us to accept on face
00:56value, as you and your Republican colleagues have, every word of propaganda
01:01that they spout. Today we are concerned that Americans' right to privacy is
01:07under attack on multiple fronts. The only privacy in which this administration and
01:13you have shown the slightest interest is the privacy of Elon Musk and his
01:17Department of Government evisceration. Doge, or more accurately, Dodge, since it
01:22dodges all forms of accountability. So thick has been the veil of secrecy
01:28surrounding Doge that Trump's attorneys actually represented in federal court
01:33that Elon Musk was not directing it. Elon's multiple tweets and President
01:39Trump's recent recognition of him during his congressional address make clear
01:44that it is indeed the unelected billionaire who's calling all the shots.
01:49Today's resolution of inquiry is unusual because these are unusual times
01:55and unusual events. This resolution represents a very modest effort to
02:01penetrate the secrecy and determine the extent of the administration's invasion
02:06of the privacy of just about every person in America. Musk has accessed and
02:12is attempting to access the personal and confidential information of our fellow
02:16citizens without our knowing the full extent of what data he's gotten to, what
02:22he's copied, how the data is or will be used by him, and the names, clearance
02:28levels, and the training of the individuals who access the data. That's
02:32the kind of facts that we seek today, not to slow any legitimate effort to reduce
02:37whatever waste, fraud, and abuse they can find, though we have yet to see a single
02:43case of fraud referred for prosecution anywhere because fraud is a new term
02:48used by this administration to simply mean anything they don't like, like the
02:53reasonable administration of the Social Security and Internal Revenue System,
02:59like corrupt, which is applied to anyone who has the courage to stand up to this
03:05administration. What we have is an extreme breach of privacy. The resolution
03:10which I am offering on behalf of every Democratic member of this committee
03:14simply asks for documents relating to DOJ's access to and usage of, first, the
03:21Treasury payment systems, second, the confidential taxpayer information
03:25protected by federal law, and third, the screenshots taken of Treasury payment
03:30systems data by a member of DOJ. Tell me how any of that slows a legitimate
03:35investigation. No, it does allow a little accountability. It allows the public to
03:40know how much damage they've already incurred. This resolution, of course, would
03:45be unnecessary had this committee shown the slightest interest, the very slightest
03:50interest, in protecting privacy and demanding even a smidgen of accountability
03:55for DOJ. Six weeks ago, Speaker Johnson committed to a hearing before our
04:00committee on DOJ, but he obviously had not received permission from his boss,
04:04Donald Trump, to do that. At the oversight hearing, neither Musk nor anyone from
04:09DOJ or the administration showed up to answer a single question. And you're
04:12right, a witness testified she had no evidence of any wrongdoing here because
04:18she had no evidence of anything about this and was not associated with DOJ or
04:22the administration. And, of course, other than a few words of praise for Musk and
04:26Republican plans to declare his birthday a national holiday and carve his face on
04:31to Mount Rushmore, the majority has offered nothing but silence as Mr. Trump
04:36followed Mr. Musk's directive to fire more veterans than any president in
04:40American history and continue to seek highly sensitive private information. One
04:45would expect that Republicans who want a legitimate investigation of waste, fraud,
04:52and abuse would not leave that witness chair empty this morning. It is empty. It
04:57has remained empty, as has their commitment to any responsible oversight
05:03over this administration. This committee is supposed to be a guardian of sensitive
05:08taxpayer information. Instead, it has appeased Mr. Musk and given him access
05:15to anything he desires. I yield back. Additional members wish to strike the
05:20last word? Mr. Thompson.

Recommended