• 10 hours ago
During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing last week, Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) spoke about DOGE cuts to the Department of Defense.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00I'm going to turn it over to
00:08Senator Hirono.
00:10Thank you Mister chairman. I
00:11would say that as our services
00:14with the exception of space
00:17force are facing recruiting
00:17challenges why should we
00:20discourage or why would we be
00:21discouraging women and
00:23minorities from enlisting with
00:28space force projects?
00:32Unfortunately not included in
00:33secretary Hicks' list of
00:35protected and prioritized
00:36programs following his
00:38directive to implement an 8%
00:40budget cut across the board at
00:42the pentagon. You testified
00:44today on the importance of
00:46PSYOP and of course clearly we
00:49need to do a better job of
00:52repair and maintaining our
00:54ships. So with the flexibility
00:57and the CR even if PSYOP is not
01:00on secretary Hicks' list of
01:02priorities are you planning to
01:04prioritize critical PSYOP
01:06projects across the fleet
01:08including for example
01:10completion of the dry dock and
01:11planning and design for a
01:13waterfront production facility
01:15at Pearl Harbor. Indeed we need
01:18to get on with continuing to
01:20modernize our 4 public ship
01:22yards so that you will have
01:24available ships to do what you
01:27need to do. So would you use
01:29the flexibility that you
01:31request in the CR to prioritize
01:34PSYOP?
01:35We want to continue on our
01:37PSYOP program, ma'am. I've
01:39talked about the 40 projects
01:41we've done. The additional 6.3
01:43billion that are in the budget
01:45that we want to continue on and
01:47the remaining projects we need
01:48to execute. So we're committed
01:50to PSYOP.
01:51Good. I'm looking to you for
01:52that because what is the point
01:56in enabling us to build more
01:58ships if we can't maintain the
02:00fleet that we currently have?
02:02A skilled workforce is
02:04foundational to military
02:06readiness. However, this
02:08administration has implemented
02:10a DOD hiring freeze and is
02:12planning to fire up to 60,000
02:14DOD employees. DOD is
02:17eliminating people across the
02:19spectrum from firing general
02:21and flag officers without cause
02:23to removing new and motivated
02:25employees. These would be
02:27employees who had just gotten
02:29hired and are being trained.
02:31And you would think that we
02:33would want to keep those folks,
02:35but the people in probationary
02:37status are among the first to
02:39go. As happened across the
02:41administration, for example,
02:43the VA, which is already
02:45strapped with the need to hire
02:47people, they just eliminated
02:49some 2,400 employees and about
02:51to eliminate 83,000 employees
02:53going forward. So gentlemen,
02:55Ms. Moore, how are these
02:57personnel actions impacting the
02:59hiring, training, and retaining
03:01of a skilled national security
03:03workforce? Briefly. You can say
03:05it's not helping.
03:07I'll start.
03:09Specific to the Marine Corps,
03:11we started our leaning-out
03:13process six budgets ago. We
03:15started our leaning-out process
03:17in January of last year. We
03:19started our leaning-out process
03:21in January of last year. We
03:23started our leaning-out process
03:25six budget cycles ago in
03:27accordance with force design and
03:29talent management. So the start
03:31game of this exercise for us,
03:33we're pretty lean. So any cut is
03:35going to have some impacts.
03:37However, of the 2,300 employees
03:39that we've identified, we've got
03:41protection, either exemption or
03:43exclusion down to a number south
03:45of 75. Not without impact, but
03:47manageable from the Marine Corps
03:49standpoint. What I'm also
03:51concerned about is the
03:53exclusions or exemptions for a
03:55hiring freeze. We lose about 7
03:57to 10 percent of our civilian
03:59workforce just through natural
04:01attrition each year, so we have
04:03to figure out a way to replenish
04:05that, or the number will just
04:07keep going down. Well, hundreds
04:09of thousands of federal employees
04:11are being fired. These firings
04:13are not based on any kind of a
04:15job performance evaluation. So
04:18what's going to happen to the
04:20DOD, I would say? So anybody
04:22else wants to weigh in? I'll
04:24just connect to our last
04:26exchange, Ranking Member. The
04:28shipyards are exempt from the
04:30probationary employees, and
04:32they're exempt from the hiring
04:34freeze. So we are trying to
04:36shape this in a manner that
04:38allows us to continue the most
04:40important work as we work
04:42through guidance from the
04:44administration. Also exempted
04:46from the hiring freeze is the
04:48Military Sealift Command, an
04:50important force for us to
04:52maintain our fleet. So I think
04:54those are efforts on the
04:56services part to manage this.
04:58Basically, all three of you are
05:00needing to identify some very
05:02critical people that you want to
05:04make sure that these firings do
05:06not hit. Is that what you're
05:08doing? Yes, Senator. Thank you,
05:10Mr. Chairman.

Recommended