During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing last week, Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) spoke about the maintenance of the Navy's amphibious vessels.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Senator Hirono. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I
00:04get that a four-year CR is
00:06going to present some very unique challenges for all of our services,
00:11including our Space Force, so we will do what we can to
00:16help you all.
00:18Admiral Kilby, I recognize the need to
00:21build a larger fleet.
00:23However, I have significant concerns about the Navy's basically dismal track record of maintaining ships and submarines in the
00:31current fleet.
00:32We consistently see delays, increased costs,
00:36ships without adequate crew, a lack of spare parts, and other issues.
00:41General Mahoney, it seems clear that maintaining amphibious ships is not a top Navy
00:48priority, and I do understand Ms. Morrow said that the Navy and the Marines need to come to an agreement on
00:54how these amphibious ships will be
00:56maintained, but how do delays in the Marine Corps' amphibious ship maintenance impact your ability to train and
01:04deploy Marines, and how would you be better supported by, and how could you be better supported by the Navy?
01:13Senator, thank you for the question. We are very concerned with
01:18the condition of the amphibious fleet and the availability of the amphibious fleet. This morning, I check it every morning,
01:24there were 13 of 32 amphibious ships available. In order to get to a goal of
01:323.0 mus, that is heel-to-toe mus
01:35combined with their amphibious shipping off the East Coast, one off the East Coast, one off the West Coast, and
01:41one in the FDNF, that number is not going to do it. I look at it in
01:48short, medium, and kind of longer term, perhaps, solution sets, and we're working closely
01:53with the Navy. Of course, we have to get to terms of reference.
01:57We can't classify a ship that hasn't sailed in 10 years and probably never will sail as an available ship of any class, much less
02:05an amphib.
02:07What I would say is we need to resource
02:11amphibious shipping to make it to their service lives and not decommission them early.
02:15Secondly, we have to get ahead of the maintenance curve. That means
02:19years ahead of port loading, of
02:22availability sequences, getting the avails in on time,
02:25making sure that we have the parts and the maintenance crews to maintain and get them out of the avails on time.
02:31More toward the midterm, we need to make every ship count with
02:36service life extensions and midlife upgrades.
02:39Thank you. I'm sorry to interrupt, but I think that your needs are being clearly articulated.
02:47And as Ms. Morris just said, we need to have,
02:50it sounds like a good suggestion to me, that the Navy and the Marine Corps need to get to
02:57an agreement on what we're going to do with the maintenance of these amphibious ships. To have only 13 out of 32
03:04available is what we say
03:07unacceptable. So as we sit here,
03:11can we have a commitment from
03:15the Navy that you are going to get into an agreement on this issue with the Marine Corps?
03:22Ranking Member Hirono, you have my commitment to that.
03:26We do brief off the same data, which is an improvement in the Navy and the Marine Corps.
03:31We have the same database, so we look at the things
03:34similarly from big deck amphibs to LPDs to LSDs. So to me, that's a start, but we have to do better.
03:40Thank you. I agree. You need to do better.
03:43Let me move on to General Mingus. Several of the critical training areas the Army uses in Hawaii,
03:48the main one being Pahakaloa on the Big Island, and the leases are set to expire in 2029. And these are
03:56vital. These leases are vital to ensure
03:59military forces can adequately train in the Pacific. And when we talk about the importance of the Indo-Pacific
04:04area, we obviously need our people to be trained. And so I would like to ask you, will you commit to
04:12continue engaging in good faith with state officials, because that's who you're negotiating these
04:18important leases with, and the community to ensure land
04:23retention is renegotiated in a way, at least
04:28negotiation, is done in a way that is fair to the state, the people of Hawaii, and the military?
04:37General Mingus?
04:38Absolutely, ma'am. We are committed to that. Since 2017, we've been working this. As you are well aware, over 500 town halls, meetings, various
04:47engagements that are out there.
04:482029 seems like a long ways away, but it'll be here tomorrow.
04:51I know that it's not.
04:53And so we will continue to and are committed to working this with you. And to the extent that a land swap may be in
04:58the offing, I do believe that we need to provide the Secretary of the Army with the authority for that. Is that correct?
05:05Yes, ma'am.
05:07Mr. Chairman, like you, I have a number of other questions. Could I just go over one minute? Sure. Thanks. Thank you.
05:14So, General Mingus, last year we spoke at this hearing about the Army's crumbling
05:19infrastructure in the Indo-Pacific region. In Hawaii, 50% of Army facilities are currently classified as
05:26failing or failed, and the cost to repair or replace them is over five billion dollars.
05:32However, the Army and other services are not using non-DOD funded
05:38contracting mechanisms, like energy savings performance contracts, to upgrade its infrastructure and
05:45lock in lower utility bills.
05:47What is the Army's plan to repair or replace infrastructure in Hawaii and in the Indo-Pacific?
05:54Ma'am, as we talked last year, there were significant investments in 23-24. We're committed to that for 25 and beyond.
06:00We know that the water and some of the critical infrastructure underneath a lot of these locations are failing.
06:06We actually think it's maybe in excess of five billion. We've committed over a billion for this next year.
06:13So, we absolutely want to work with you on those infrastructure, to include the leadership that goes with this as well.
06:20Kwajalein is an example where that was largely paid for with RDT and E-dollars.
06:24We've actually put a garrison commander there to make sure that the leadership, in addition to the resources, is there to fix these problems.
06:31I think the energy projects, for example, are important because the Army is the biggest user of it, and the military, DOD,
06:39Army in particular, is the biggest user of energy, and whatever sums you can save on energy costs as well can go to other needed,
06:48necessary projects. So, would you commit to clear the logjam on installation of energy projects funded through
06:56non-DOD
06:57contract mechanisms?
07:00Absolutely, take a look at that, ma'am. Yes, yes. Thank you. Thank you, Senator.