Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 4/8/2025
During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) asked about what outside factors could coerce Google to change.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Yes, yes, yes, exactly.
00:03Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:05Great panel.
00:07It seems that this committee hearing is all about the elephant in the room, and all we're missing is an elephant.
00:15It's good to see and hear your observations on the state of play with Google at this moment.
00:22I'm trying to analogize this, and maybe I'm way off base, to what happened to AT&T.
00:28And telephone service in my lifetime, traumatic changes brought on by political forces, market forces, and perhaps innovation, all converging at once.
00:43Senator Klobuchar and I have been working together, and she's been a leader on this issue, and we have noted something interesting.
00:51When we went after child sexual abuse and had roll call votes on this Judiciary Committee, with a spectrum of political thought represented, we ended up with unanimous votes for five bills.
01:06Unanimous votes!
01:08Let me tell you, as a politician for life, it was a shock.
01:12What we didn't realize was that wasn't enough to get the votes in this committee.
01:17Moving beyond that point meant taking on big tech, and we weren't very successful in that regard.
01:24So my question, stepping back for a moment, is whether this conversation about Google and its market dominance that was demonstrated by the committee
01:35is one that is subjected to market, political, or innovation forces that are going to lead to a change, even though they may be initially resistant.
01:45Any thoughts on that comparison?
01:48Professor Van Loo?
01:49I'm optimistic right now, in part because the kinds of solutions that we're looking at in the America Act and beyond
02:04are going to help such a broad array of actors, not just consumers, but also small businesses.
02:13You have little tech that wants reform.
02:16You have even some of the CEOs of big tech calling for reform, although I get that that might be, you know,
02:21we can question where that's coming from.
02:23But so I could see, for many of these reforms, a coalition being built with strong political economy.
02:30I think it gets tougher when maybe all businesses are on one side and consumers are on the other.
02:35So let me interrupt you, if I can, for a moment.
02:38I was involved in a battle, and still am, on the credit card side of the world, between MasterCard, Visa, and the rest of the world,
02:50where they dominate when it comes to swipe fees, interchange fees.
02:55What we managed to do was to organize the retailers of America like never before.
03:01They all came together, big and small, and all argued they were being treated unfairly,
03:06and they were.
03:08We managed to engineer reform on the debit side, working on it on the credit side.
03:14Do you think consumers and retailers are sufficient organized force now to be an agent of change in Google?
03:22Consumers, no.
03:24They need to be, or it would be great to find a way to get them organized.
03:27I do think on the business side, you are seeing more organizing happening, and I think you have these models.
03:34Another model is when the internet was growing in the early years, Hollywood organized on one side and had exemptions to liability.
03:49So Section 230 provided internet liability for platforms, but Hollywood said, no, not for copyright.
03:55We want to protect our copyright online.
03:58And so there are all these models.
03:59I like the one that you're pointing to with MasterCard, Visa, credit card companies that we can draw on right now.
04:07Anyone else have any thoughts on it?
04:09Mr. Kent?
04:09I mean, the enforcement happening in the courts, and then I think legislation, starting with simple common sense rules like America Act, are critically important.
04:18None of these publishers, I work for some of the biggest media companies out there in terms of content creators, entertainment companies,
04:25and they can't negotiate on their own to the terms that would make sense.
04:28Google's too powerful.
04:30They control the discovery, the monetization, every aspect of how information entertainment gets out in the digital world.
04:36And so it's going to require more than just, certainly more than the consumers.
04:42There's not real competition.
04:43And I actually think the businesses themselves can't organize in a way to drive that change right now.

Recommended