During the Senate Judiciary hearing on the 'Censorship Industrial Complex' on Tuesday, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) asked a witness point blank if he felt that President Trump did the right thing in pardoning January 6th Rioters.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Senator Durbin.
00:04Mr. Weingarten, do you think the January 6th riot at the Capitol was protected free speech?
00:13I think to the extent there was peaceful protest, that's free speech.
00:16And when it bleeds into violence to action, that's when it certainly crosses a line.
00:21So you believe that some of the individuals who received full and unconditional pardons by the President of the United States
00:27had in fact crossed the line and were guilty of criminal conduct?
00:34This is beyond the scope of what I prepared to discuss today, but in my personal opinion as a non-lawyer,
00:39yes, I believe some people committed crimes.
00:44They certainly did. 140 policemen were assaulted by these rioters.
00:48I'm on the policeman's side. I hope you are too.
00:51I am.
00:52Well, a full and unconditional pardon to some of these folks is incredible.
00:57Jake Lang, charged with assaulting police during January 6th, announced he plans to run for Senate in Florida.
01:04He's pretty emboldened by that pardon, isn't he?
01:07You don't have to answer that question.
01:09Let me ask you what the word wrong-think means. Did you make that up?
01:13If I did make it up, I'd be happy to take credit for it.
01:17My definition of it would be speech that flouts the orthodoxy of our political establishment and cultural elites.
01:27Interesting. I'll put that in my research bag to look at a little later.
01:32But you said whole of society war. I don't know what that means. Can you define that?
01:37Well, whole of society is actually a phrase that the Biden administration used in any number of documents that could be relevant to...
01:45I missed it. What does it mean?
01:47Whole of society means government working hand-in-hand with civil society to achieve some sort of outcome, as I understand it.
01:53Do you think that's inherently wrong or insidious?
01:57I think on its face it's potentially chilling when you have government and civil society working hand-in-glove
02:04because that blurring of the line between civil society and the state can cross into potentially draconian methods and outcomes.
02:13Do you think President George W. Bush was guilty of that when he mobilized America against the events of 9-11?
02:19Senator, in the context of this hearing, my view of it is that when government works hand-in-glove with civil society to purge disfavored speech,
02:30that certainly crosses a line, and it's significantly different, in my view, from mobilizing support for a war effort.
02:36Very subjective. Dr. Franks, I'm going to let you finish answering this question.
02:42I think this attack on law firms for representing unpopular clients, unpopular with this administration,
02:48is one of the most dangerous developments I've seen in the violation of basic free speech.
02:54I think I come to mind immediately John Adams.
02:58What would have happened to poor John Adams representing those British soldiers if the incumbent president decided to punish him for that?
03:06What do you think about the future of legal representation as these law firms, at least one of them,
03:12has reached an agreement and settlement with the Trump administration?
03:15I very much share your alarm about those actions because, as you mentioned, access to the courts is a very key principle of our freedoms.
03:23And to threaten law firms, to threaten law firms that are trying to do what all of us should rely on,
03:29which is to defend people's rights and courts, is extremely chilling.
03:34And it is one of those ways where we're seeing just really a comprehensive assault by this administration,
03:39not only directly to try to round up people, surveil them, deport them for their speech,
03:44but also to try to disable the levers that they can defend themselves with and to punish businesses for acting on their own principles.
03:51Mr. Rotman, not much subtlety in saying to the Associated Press, if you use the term Gulf of Mexico, you're not welcome in the White House.
03:59Yes, sir?
04:01It is explicit viewpoint discrimination that underpins retaliatory actions by the White House, and that makes it a First Amendment violation.
04:10And deportation of individuals for making statements, political statements, where would you characterize that?
04:19So the authority that's been invoked, so I come at it from the Freedom of the Press perspective,
04:26but what's notable about some of those cases is they're relying on a statute that explicitly allows immigration enforcement actions
04:35based on the speech of the person the action's being taken against, and that's of great concern for the press.
04:42Thank you very much to all of you, and I hope that you'll say thank you to the men and women in Capitol Police when you leave
04:48who are keeping you safe today as they did in my situation on January 6th with the rioters.
04:53Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
04:55Thank you, Senator.
04:56Senator Blackburn.