New Delhi, May 14, 2025 (ANI): Top 7 moments: India openly roasts, exposes, mocks, fact-checks Pakistan's lies after 'Operation Sindoor'.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Regarding the interview that the PAK foreign minister gave, in the last week, as a result of Operation Sindur, Pakistan has seen its terror centers in Mahawalpur, Murudke, Muzaffarabad and other places destroyed.
00:18You have been informed of it in several of the briefings that we have had. Thereafter, its military capabilities were significantly degraded by us and key air bases effectively put out of action.
00:34If the Pakistani FM wishes to project these as achievement, obviously he is welcome to do so. Where India is concerned, our stand was very clear and consistent from the start.
00:47We would target terrorist infrastructure operating out of Pakistan. If the Pakistani military stayed out, there would be no problem. If they fired on us, we would respond suitably.
01:02Till the night of 9th May, Pakistan was threatening India with a massive assault. Once their attempt failed on 10th May morning and they received a devastating Indian counter response, their tune changed.
01:22And their DGMO eventually reached out to us. I just referred to the timings, etc. as to when they reached out.
01:32In essence, India's position remained the same. Pakistan's position changed on 10th May morning after its air bases were effectively put out of action.
01:45So, all you have to do is to look at who called who to negotiate the terms of the cessation of firing. By the way, you know, we are living in a day and age where you have satellite pictures available commercially.
02:04I urge you to look at the satellite pictures of the sites which Pakistan says or claims to have attacked in India. Contrast it with the sites and places which we successfully targeted and destroyed.
02:22That will give you a clear answer. Claiming victory is an old habit.
02:27From the time of Operation Sindur, commenced on 7th May, till the understanding on cessation of firing,
02:57and military action and military action on 10th May, there were conversations between Indian and U.S. leaders on the evolving military situation.
03:11The issue of trade did not come up in any of these discussions.
03:23We have seen the statement made by the Pakistani side.
03:27That a nation which has nurtured terrorism on an industrial scale should think that it can escape the consequences is fooling itself.
03:38The terrorist infrastructure sites that India destroyed were responsible not only for the deaths of Indians, but of many other innocents around the world.
03:49There is now a new normal.
03:54The sooner Pakistan gets it, the better it is.
03:57The interesting thing that the
04:03of an Январь of Fakarari,
04:06Fakarari,
04:09Fakarari,
04:10you have another question regarding ceasefire and what sort of role other countries played
04:36see the specific date time and wording of the understanding was worked out between the DGMOs of the two countries at their phone call on 10th May 2025 commencing at 1535 hours
04:54the foreign secretary had made a statement in this regard as you would be aware
04:58the request for this call was received by MEA from the Pakistani high commission at 1237 hours
05:06the Pakistani side had initial difficulties connecting the hotline due to connecting to the Indian side due to technical difficulties
05:20the timing was then decided based on the availability of the Indian DGMO at 1535 hours
05:28the military action from our side was entirely in the conventional domain
05:32this was also made very clear in the defense briefing yesterday
05:37there were some questions also which were asked
05:39there were some reports however that Pakistan National Command Authority will meet on 10th May which we saw
05:47but this was later denied by them
05:49Pakistan FM has himself denied the nuclear angle on record
05:55so Rishabh that also answers your question
05:58as you know India has a firm stance that will that it will not give in to nuclear blackmail
06:04or allow crossword terrorism to be conducted invoking it
06:09in conversations with various countries we have also cautioned
06:13that their subscribing to such scenarios could hurt them in their own region
06:18we have had several rounds of briefings and in these briefings we have also shared with you
06:23the kind of linkage we see between the preparators of the attack of Pahlgam
06:28in particular the resistance front
06:32foreign secretary in his statement also made very clear the kind of evidence that we see
06:41an investigation is going on in this particular matter
06:45you would have seen that TRF had taken responsibility and then second time again
06:50second day twice they had taken responsibility and thereafter possibly at the behest of their handlers
06:57they rolled it back but TRF is one organization which is a front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba
07:03and you would understand and perhaps be in the knowledge of it that we have been pursuing listing
07:10of TRF in the United Nations by the United Nations Security Council by the sanctions committee UNSC 1267
07:18sanctions committee I'm not privy to what was shared two hours back but for sure we'll update you on
07:28as to how the investigation progresses in this matter
07:33mega on UNSC 1267 sanctions committee yes over the last two years or so 23 24
07:44we have been sharing information with the united nations security council the monitoring team of the
07:51sanctions committee as to why
07:56the terrorist TRF which is the front for Lashkar-e-Taiba should be listed as a terrorist entity
08:03we will be also in few days time we will be sharing more details in this regard
08:08and hopefully security council 1267 monitoring team will take strong note of what we present
08:18what we file and take due action against that is required regarding the interview that the park
08:26foreign minister gave in the last week as a result of opposition operation sindoor
08:34pakistan has seen its terror centers in mahalpur murudke muzafrabad and other places destroyed
08:44you have been informed of it in several of the briefings that we've had
08:48thereafter its military capabilities were significantly degraded by us and key air bases effectively put out of action
08:59if the pakistani fm wishes to project these as achievement obviously he is welcome to do so
09:06where india is concerned our stand was very clear and consistent from the start
09:11we would target terrorist infrastructure operating out of pakistan if the pakistani military stayed out
09:20there would be no problem if they fired on us we would respond suitably till the 9th till the night of 9th may
09:31pakistan was threatening india with a massive assault once their attempt failed on 10th may morning
09:41and they received a devastating indian counter response their tune changed and their dgmo eventually
09:50reached out to us i've made i just referred to the timings etc as to when they reached out
09:57in essence india's position remained the same pakistan position changed on 10th may morning after its air
10:05bases were effectively pulled out a pull put out of action all you have to do is to look at who called
10:13who to negotiate the the terms of the cessation of firing