The U.S. government continues to violate the “One China” policy, a stance that has been at the core of U.S.-China relations for decades. In this analysis, The New Atlas explores the strategic motivations behind Washington's actions and the potential implications for global stability.
Is this a calculated move to undermine China, or is there something deeper at play in U.S. foreign policy?
#OneChinaPolicy #USChinaRelations #Geopolitics #Washington #China #ForeignPolicy #GlobalStability #TheNewAtlas #USStrategy #ChinaTaiwan #TaiwanIssue #InternationalRelations #USPolitics #ChinaPolicy #GlobalPolitics #StrategicInterests #GeopoliticalTensions #ChinaUSConflict #Diplomacy
Is this a calculated move to undermine China, or is there something deeper at play in U.S. foreign policy?
#OneChinaPolicy #USChinaRelations #Geopolitics #Washington #China #ForeignPolicy #GlobalStability #TheNewAtlas #USStrategy #ChinaTaiwan #TaiwanIssue #InternationalRelations #USPolitics #ChinaPolicy #GlobalPolitics #StrategicInterests #GeopoliticalTensions #ChinaUSConflict #Diplomacy
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00I have recently written an article for Beijing Review. It's actually my first article that I've
00:04written for the publication. As always, I'm going to read over the entire article. I will go into
00:10additional information when and if necessary. We will take a look at all the sources that I cited
00:14while writing this. And a lot of this is going to be about reviewing the status of Taiwan,
00:23U.S. interference in Taiwan, and why this is a focal point of this growing tension between the
00:33U.S. and China, which includes the tariffs and this trade war the U.S. is trying to provoke or has
00:41provoked with China and how it's all connected and what is the U.S. actually really trying to do? Are
00:47they really trying to re-industrialize the U.S.? No, they're not. They're trying to create the same
00:52exact type of conflict with China that they've already started with Russia, that they're still
00:56trying to start with Iran. They understand that time is working against them. They're rushing to
01:01get all of this done, which is why you see such big, bold moves like 200-whatever percent tariffs on
01:10China, on everything from China. You're going to charge them millions of dollars for their ships to
01:15dock at our ports. It's all out, first economic war, and they have for years been planning actual
01:23war with China to try to stop its rise, reassert American dominance over the planet. So all these
01:29people who voted for Donald J. Trump to fight the deep state, end American empire abroad, and focus on
01:37America back at home within America's actual borders, you're in for a big disappointment because
01:42this is where all of this is headed. It is a last-ditch effort to salvage American empire,
01:48not end it. So let me begin. While much attention is focused on the economic fallout of worldwide
01:55tariffs imposed by the U.S. against allies and designated adversaries alike, it is only one part
02:01of a much wider strategy aimed at what U.S. policymakers themselves claim as a bid to maintain the U.S.
02:07as the world's dominant superpower. It's not about making America great. It's about
02:14maintaining American empire, maintaining American dominance worldwide. These very words, this is a
02:21quote, these very words were written by now White House advisor Peter Navarro, who in 2023 wrote
02:29chapter 26, trade for the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 policy paper now being put into policy
02:37under the Trump administration. I've talked about Project 2025 many times here. You see all the
02:44chapters, absolutely everything the Trump administration is doing was written back in 2023
02:50under Project 2025, which was put out by the Heritage Foundation, which is funded by and directed by
02:59deep state corporate financier interests, the largest, most corrupt corporate monopolies on planet Earth,
03:05fund think tanks like the Heritage Foundation. They put out policy papers like this, and then it's
03:13implemented as policy by the U.S. government. And look at this. Trade, the case for fair trade. Who wrote
03:20it? Peter Navarro. Does that name sound familiar to you? It should, because, and I've had a lot of people
03:27tell me, Brian, Project 2025 has nothing to do with the Trump administration. Not only is the Trump
03:32administration implementing almost line for line, the policies laid out in Project 2025, he has taken
03:39people like Peter Navarro and moved them into his administration to oversee the implementation of
03:45the policies they wrote about in Project 2025. So I want people to be very clear about this. Stop making
03:51excuses and look at what is really happening. That is not a coincidence. As was laid out in Project 2025,
03:58the Western media now admits these tariffs are less about reindustrializing the U.S. and instead seek
04:03to isolate China as a means of reasserting American dominance worldwide. And I've warned people about
04:08this. Had nothing to do with reindustrializing the U.S. If you wanted to reindustrialize the U.S.,
04:12you need to reform education. You need to nationalize not just industry, but also infrastructure. And you
04:19need to invest huge amounts of public money into all of the above. And what has the U.S. done instead? The exact
04:26opposite. And the tariffs, you would not need to have such extreme tariffs like this. Because all
04:35extreme tariffs like this will do is disrupt the entire global economy, including your own economy.
04:41These tariffs began under the first Trump administration. They continued uninterrupted
04:45under the Biden administration. And they have precipitated an immense cost-of-living crisis in
04:51the U.S. that continues to escalate. That is not how you fix your economy back at home. That's
04:57something that you do trying to out-compete China to maintain world domination. That is not how you
05:05make America great again inside America for the actual people living there. In many ways, recent U.S.
05:12policy aims to isolate China through tariffs in the same way the previous Biden administration sought
05:18to isolate and undermine Russia economically through sanctions. And I actually heard the Duran and
05:24Alexander of the Duran making this observation, kind of coming to the conclusion that this is what
05:31is happening. Yes, this is exactly what is happening. It has nothing to do with re-industrializing
05:36the U.S. It has nothing to do with protecting American industry. It is all about isolating China. It is
05:41about waging the same war on China that the U.S. has been waging on Russia. Another key component
05:47of this strategy is China's own island province of Taiwan. So the U.S. used Ukraine to trigger this
05:54highly destructive proxy war against Russia. They're going to actually use the island province
05:59of Taiwan that the U.S. has de facto politically captured, but is still under international law,
06:05recognized as Chinese territory. They're going to transform Taiwan into a Ukraine-style proxy
06:12to threaten war or wage war against the rest of China. They continue building it up in the exact
06:20same way they built up Ukraine. But it's much worse because it's actual Chinese territory under
06:26international law. Despite decades of insisting it upholds a one-China policy, recognizing only one
06:33China, that Taiwan is part of China, and that the People's Republic of China is the sole legitimate
06:39government of China. The U.S. has not only violated this policy, it has done so with increasing frequency
06:46and severity in recent years, all as a means of transforming the island into a Ukraine-style
06:52proxy to use against the rest of China. Many people don't seem to understand this because the Western
06:58media lies in such a concerted manner regarding Taiwan, and they really exploit the public's ignorance
07:06over Taiwan status to achieve this very misleading understanding of the status of Taiwan. Many
07:15Americans believe that Taiwan is an actual country and that China is bullying it. They don't understand
07:22that if they go to the U.S. State Department's own website right here, U.S. Relations with Taiwan,
07:28that the U.S. has a long-standing one-China policy. What is the one-China policy? I just told you,
07:35it means there's only one China, Taiwan is part of China, there's only one government of China,
07:39and it's in Beijing. That means Taiwan is not independent of China, is part of China,
07:44and it falls under the sovereignty of the government based in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.
07:49And yet the U.S., in every conceivable way, with the help of a complicit Western media,
07:55regardless of whether it's liberal or conservative leaning, they are violating their own one-China
08:02policy. And this is all based on communiques, an agreement with China back in the 1970s regarding
08:11the status of Taiwan. So let's look at this. The Office of the Historian, a joint statement following
08:18discussions with leaders of the People's Republic of China, 1972. And I talk about this in the article,
08:26according to the U.S. government's own agreement with Beijing documented within the 1972 Shanghai
08:32Communique, this is what it states. It says, the U.S. side declared, the United States acknowledges that
08:38all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan
08:43is part of China. Now, this is very important. The United States government does not challenge that
08:49position. They don't just recognize that people believe that. They also go as far as saying they do not
08:55challenge that position, which is a wormy way of saying you agree with it without saying you agree
09:03with it because you fully plan on betraying your agreement with China, as the U.S. does with all
09:09of its agreements, regardless of who is in office. It affirms its interest in a peaceful settlement of
09:15the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves, which means no U.S. interference. Stop getting involved
09:21in Taiwan. It's none of your business. It is a Chinese matter of internal political affairs
09:26butt out. But they can't and they won't and they don't. Not then, not now. The U.S. also affirmed
09:34that its ultimate objective was the withdrawal of all U.S. forces and military installations from Taiwan
09:40because at that time they had thousands of U.S. troops on the island province of Taiwan. They were
09:45occupying part of China and they agreed with China to withdraw from Taiwan and allow it to fully
09:54reunify with the rest of China. But then they betrayed that agreement, obviously. Initially,
10:00the U.S. did indeed withdraw U.S. forces from the island province, but subsequent unilateral U.S. laws,
10:06including the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances, negated U.S. commitments both to Beijing
10:12and its obligation under international law to instead maintain unofficial ties to the administration in
10:19Taipei, as well as continue military support through arms sales. And in recent years, the redeployment of
10:25U.S. troops to Taiwan itself, both under the first Trump administration and the subsequent Biden
10:30administration. And that presence of U.S. troops on Taiwan continues under this current Trump
10:36administration. The U.S. has also continued to expand arms shipments to the Ayan province of Taiwan,
10:42including a two billion U.S. dollar arms deal reported on by CNN in late 2024. So here are the
10:50articles regarding U.S. troops on Taiwan. This is mainstream Western media reporting this secret
10:56group of U.S. military trainers has been in Taiwan for at least a year. This was 2021. And then this from
11:01Newsweek, Taiwan confirms U.S. troops on frontline islands near China. So they're expanding the military
11:08footprint inside Chinese territory. Taiwan is Chinese territory. Under international law, if you were to
11:14go to the U.N. and ask the U.N. what is the status of Taiwan, they will say it is part of China. And so
11:20the United States is illegally occupying part of Chinese territory. And when the Western media
11:25pretends that China is bullying this independent island, but then you look at the State Department's
11:32own website, its own agreement it made with China in the 1970s, what it still pretends it's upholding,
11:39even right now. This is Secretary of State Marco Rubio's U.S. relations with Taiwan webpage. He took out
11:48a very important sentence, but he still acknowledges the U.S. has a one China policy. That sentence is
11:55right here. We do not support Taiwan independence. So you can see how the U.S. is gradually backsliding
12:01on its own agreement with China. And that is what is causing all of these tensions.
12:06Within the first few weeks in office, the Trump administration would sail U.S. warships through
12:10the Taiwan Strait as another means of provoking Beijing. The U.S. does this deliberately under
12:15every administration to stick it to China regarding Taiwan, to deliberately, provocatively violate its
12:22own agreement with China over the status of Taiwan by sailing ships through the Strait,
12:27which there's no other purpose for those ships to go through the Strait but to provoke China. And you
12:33have to ask yourself, well, how does that fit in with making America great again? Unless you honestly
12:38believe all of America's problems are China's fault on the other side of the planet. You have no agency
12:45or responsibility for your own mess you made in your country. It's all China's fault. And bullying and
12:51picking a fight with China is the way we solve all those problems. If you believe that,
12:55then I can't help you. The U.S. has also ramped up unauthorized visits to the administration in
13:00Taipei by serving U.S. politicians, including U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi in 2022,
13:08as well as more recent visits by serving U.S. senators like Pete Ricketts this year. So we have,
13:15I think we all remember Nancy Pelosi's trip to Taiwan in 2022. And they're unauthorized because
13:20Taiwan is part of China. They did not ask the government in Beijing whether they could travel
13:25to China or not. They just went to Taiwan because they have de facto begun carving it off from China.
13:33And then that was 2022. This is 2025. And this is the president.gov.tw, the pretend president of the
13:43Italian province of Taiwan. President Lai meets U.S. delegation led by Senator Pete Ricketts. And so
13:50this is what the U.S. government has been doing all along. Highly provocative. If China was doing
13:55this to the U.S., it would have been war already. At the crux of growing U.S.-Chinese tensions is
14:00ultimately America's refusal to accept China's rise and the U.S.'s own decline as the world's dominant
14:07superpower. As Peter Navarro, who is now overseeing the tariffs and this economic war being waged against
14:13China, that is the purpose of all of this, maintaining the U.S. as the world's dominant
14:19superpower. Not helping Americans back in America, but maintaining the empire globally. In a bid to
14:27sabotage China's rise and reassert its own dominance, the U.S. seeks to encircle and contain China using its
14:32own island province of Taiwan and neighboring nations in the same way it is attempting to
14:37encircle and contain Russia in Europe. And that includes through this proxy war still raging in
14:42Ukraine. That is a U.S. war on Russia fought through Ukraine. And that brings me to the next section of
14:50this article titled, A Familiar and Dangerous Pattern. And of course, I'm referring to U.S. war, proxy war
14:58against Russia. In the same way they have set all of that up, they're doing the exact same thing vis-a-vis
15:03China. This process reflects similar agreements made with Russia following the fall of the Soviet
15:08Union regarding the expansion of NATO into former Soviet territories. NATO promised they wouldn't, and
15:14then they did, just like they promised they would respect Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan, but then they
15:18didn't. Development and deployment of specific types of weapons. So the U.S. made all kinds of arms
15:23agreements with Russia and then violated and walked away from all of them. And the growing encroachment
15:30and containment of Russia in subsequent decades as these agreements were systematically violated.
15:35Today, tens of thousands of U.S. troops are now stationed both across Eastern Europe and the Asia-Pacific
15:41region to contain both Russia and China. And Russia and China are natural allies. They're also
15:48actual allies, very close allies. And the U.S. seeks to subordinate, undermine, overthrow, subordinate
15:57both of them. Again, to maintain American dominance, not help Americans back in America.
16:02If Ukraine served as a catalyst to escalate significantly against Russia, including through
16:07coercing nations around the globe to cut diplomatic and economic ties with Russia and also literally blow up
16:13pipelines between Russia and Europe and a bid to isolate Moscow, the recent tariffs and a possible
16:20conflict over Taiwan or perhaps the Philippines threatened to do likewise to China. And I have
16:26been talking about the Trump administration's obsession with the Panama Canal and Greenland openly
16:33referencing Chinese maritime shipping. They're setting all of this up ahead of the provocation they will
16:40cite to implement a global blockade on Chinese maritime shipping. And it's not just the Trump
16:46administration. The Biden administration for four years reorganized the entire U.S. military to
16:51interdict Chinese maritime shipping worldwide. Beyond attempting to transform the island province of
16:58Taiwan into the next Ukraine, the U.S. has also attempted to politically subvert and capture nations all
17:03along China's periphery, including across Central, Southeast, and East Asia. I'm going political turmoil and even
17:10armed conflict has resulted from these policies, including an ongoing war in Myanmar, right on
17:16China's border, which also neighbors Thailand, where I am based, and most concerning of all the use of the
17:22Philippines, Japan, and South Korea to station growing numbers of U.S. troops and weapons specifically
17:27aimed at threatening China. So just in the same way the U.S. politically captured all of Europe and
17:33especially Eastern Europe, militarized all of them, transformed them into a battering ramp to use
17:39against Russia. They're trying to do the same thing all across Asia, Eurasia and Asia to encircle and
17:46contain China. Regarding the Philippines specifically, which resides closest to China's island province of
17:53Taiwan, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's first trip to Asia was to the archipelago island
18:01nation, supposedly to counter China's aggression in the Indo-Pacific region. CNN would report that is
18:09this article right here. And so that is him going to the Philippines to recruit them to become the
18:15next Ukraine, Asia's Ukraine, if Taiwan isn't already that. The aggression the U.S. refers to are minor
18:24maritime disputes in the South China Sea, previously managed bilaterally. The U.S. has since injected
18:30itself into the middle of in a bid to escalate into regional or even global crisis. So if you live in
18:41this region, you will see in the news constantly maritime disputes between all of the nations in
18:48the region, not just with China, but all of these nations with each other as well. They capture each
18:54other's fishing boats when they are encroaching in each other's territories. They will deport the
18:59fishing crews back to their home country. They will very publicly blow up and sink these fishing boats
19:05or auction them off. And even though it gets very seemingly tense, all of these countries have
19:12otherwise very close ties with one another. They cooperate a lot with one another. And relations
19:18are actually very friendly. And that includes between all of these nations and China. So what the U.S. has
19:23done is take these maritime disputes and try to escalate them, create an artificial crisis the U.S.
19:30can use as an excuse to militarize the region, insert itself militarily, and transform a nation it can
19:37politically capture, which is obviously the Philippines. That government has been completely
19:42politically captured by the U.S. and forced to, just like Ukraine, confront China at its own expense
19:50and for Washington's benefit. That is what is going on here. U.S.-based think tank, the Center for Strategic
19:58and International Studies, CSIS, recognizes the vast majority of trade moving through the South China Sea
20:03is either originating in China or is on its way to China. Let's take a look at that. I've shown this many,
20:11many times. CSIS is actually funded by the U.S. government and also all of the arms manufacturers that
20:18drive U.S. foreign policy. But this is what they admit, this big red dot. This is global trade
20:25through the South China Sea. You can see the biggest nations are the nations in this region.
20:31Almost all of these nations count China as their largest trade partner, both for exports and imports.
20:37And they're the ones sending trade through the South China Sea. So when the U.S. says they're in the
20:41South China Sea to protect trade from China, it's China's trade. So they're obviously lying. So why are
20:47they really there? They're there to threaten. And if the opportunity presents itself, to interdict
20:53that trade, to disrupt it. If you take a look at the Philippines as an exporter, their largest export
21:01partner is China. You have to count China and Hong Kong as one. It's over 16, 17 percent. U.S., 8 percent.
21:10So the Philippines subordinating itself to the U.S. makes no sense in terms of the Philippines'
21:18own best interest. Working together with China makes the most sense. But because they've been
21:22politically captured, a client regime operates in Manila and guides Philippine policy in a way that
21:30benefits Washington at the cost of the Philippines and their best interests. This is the exact same
21:35situation the U.S. created for Ukraine when they politically captured Ukraine in 2014.
21:42Thus, the U.S. is not building a military partnership with the Philippines to protect it
21:47from its largest and most important trade partner, which is China, but instead to transform it into a
21:53Ukraine-style proxy to use against China. And just as is the case with Ukraine entirely at the
21:59Philippines' own cost. This is an impoverished nation, has a much larger population than Thailand,
22:05but a much smaller GDP specifically because it has not been allowed to develop naturally. And for its
22:13own best interest, it has constantly served as a proxy for U.S. interests, except for a very short
22:19time under Rodrigo Duterte. But now they've told the Philippines to cart him off to The Hague,
22:27go to white people's jail. I mean, the jailers are white. All the people in jail are brown.
22:32And stay there out of the way so the U.S. can use, you may or may not know this, the Philippines were
22:40literally a former U.S. colony. And the U.S. still uses it as a de facto colony. The cost is already
22:48rising. Infrastructure projects already underway between China and the Philippines aimed at improving
22:54the economy and the quality of life for Filipinos were canceled with public funds diverted instead to
23:00military projects aimed at China. And that's according to this South China Morning Post article,
23:07which is more pro-West than it is China. China-Philippines ties on brink of total breakdown,
23:14unpacking the collapse. If you look at the fact that China is their largest trade partner and you look
23:21at other nations cooperating with China, like Thailand, for example, I've lived here almost my entire
23:27adult life. I have witnessed the material improvement for life for Thai people because of its relationship
23:36with China. I personally benefit from this in ways Thailand's subordination to the U.S. and its regional
23:45proxies like Japan back in the past would never have would never have done. And the Philippines are
23:54denying themselves this opportunity by being turned into a proxy by and for the U.S. And so in this
24:02article, they talk about concrete pillars from a rail project that the Philippines desperately needs.
24:06They desperately need moderate infrastructure. It was all torn down. And instead, they're building a
24:13missile base to threaten China with. Their largest trade partner threatened China with. This is exactly
24:19what the U.S. did with Ukraine. Ukraine was a natural partner with Russia. It was benefiting from
24:27its relationship with both Russia and the West. And the U.S. turned them into a proxy, militarized them,
24:35and has now caused them to self-destruct in this proxy war with Russia. That's what they're doing to
24:42the Philippines. They're next. Despite claims by the U.S. that seeks to uphold freedom of navigation and
24:48defend peace and stability across the Indo-Pacific, Washington serves as the greatest threat to the
24:53region. And all in a bid to maintain unwarranted dominance over the Asia-Pacific, a region the
24:59United States is not even geographically located within. These troops the U.S. is sending to Asia
25:05are closer to China than they are to America's own shorts. Just think about that. Think about the
25:10implications of that. And if it were the other way around, how Americans would feel if it was China
25:16doing that to them? You already see how they react to these fake stories about China buying up all of
25:22America's farmland, how upset they are about that when Chinese investors own 1% of foreign-owned
25:31farmland. So foreign-owned farmland is a very small percentage of all American farmland. And then of that
25:39tiny percentage, 1% of it is owned by Chinese investors. And you see Americans having meltdowns
25:45thinking that the Chinese are buying up all of their farmland. Imagine if China was actually
25:51threatening the U.S. in the same way the U.S. is actually threatening China. Because Washington will
25:58not change course, considering the decades of uninterrupted bipartisan policy that has led to
26:04this juncture, it is up to China and its partners to insist on regional and cross-strait peace and
26:11cooperation, while creating defenses against not only U.S. military force and that of its proxies,
26:17but also against the more indirect political and economic interference and coercion. Soft power,
26:22if you will. That has played such a central role in facilitating Washington's policies across Asia
26:28and around the world for decades. And I think China is more or less doing this. But I think the one
26:33weak point the multipolar world is failing at and needs to improve at is understanding, exposing,
26:44and countering U.S. so-called soft power, its ability to politically interfere and capture nations
26:50and cause them to commit to policy that completely contradicts their own best interests. I see many
26:58people saying, well, all of these countries, they're not going to go along with President Trump's
27:03tariffs. They're not going to be recruited into a united front against China. They already have in a
27:10united front against Russia. Why wouldn't they also do it against China? I hear a lot of people claiming
27:16that Europe is going to make a deal with China and, you know, balance out their relationship with
27:22the United States. That's what everyone thought before the U.S. overthrew the government of Ukraine in
27:272014. We all saw how that played out. If the U.S. has politically captured a nation, it is not going
27:33to create rational policy. It will create policy that serves U.S. interests at their own expense
27:38over and over again. So what the multipolar world needs to do is help all nations within the
27:45multipolar world defend themselves against this political interference and political capture. Here in
27:51Thailand, despite President Trump claiming all of these regime change tools have been dismantled,
27:58they still operate. I still see the U.S.-backed political party walking up and down the streets
28:04in my neighborhood for local elections. They're still here. They're still working their way into
28:09everything. And that is how the U.S. ends up convincing nations to work against their own best interests.
28:15They create these client regimes who serve Washington and benefit personally from that
28:21while destroying their nation completely in the process. So this is something that I have worked on
28:29exposing for years. This is something I still think is of critical importance. I see Russia, China,
28:37and the rest of the multi-world taking a lot of positive steps in not just expanding multipolarism but
28:46protecting it from what is obviously a U.S. war against it. But I think they need to double down on
28:53these soft power tools the U.S. uses its capture of media, of education, of the political system in all of
29:06these countries. This needs to be exposed and confronted. And say ASEAN, the Association of
29:13Southeast Asian Nations, they, for example, should create a regional effort to expose and defend
29:21against U.S. interference within their collective borders and obviously within their individual
29:25borders and to help each other against U.S. interference. In many cases, say in Myanmar,
29:31this war the U.S. is waging against the central government, again through proxy militants. A lot
29:37of that is being staged here in Thailand. So ASEAN could work together to uproot all of this
29:44and prevent the U.S. from doing this to any of ASEAN's members because any ASEAN member being
29:50destabilized is a setback for all of ASEAN and all of Asia and all of the world. So I will keep
29:58track of all of this. We'll keep an eye on all of this. If you thought this video was useful,
30:04please like and share. Think about subscribing. It's free to do. It helps the channel grow. Check
30:09the video description below for other places you can find and follow my work. I publish all of my work,
30:13including uploading all of my videos on YouTube, Rumble, X, and Telegram. Check the video description
30:21for all of the links that I referenced in this video, including the article itself in Beijing
30:25Review. Also, the video description below are ways you can help support my work. I do not monetize
30:31my social media platforms. If ads pop up, feel free to skip them. They're not helping me out at all.
30:38If you do want to help support my work, please do so through Buy Me A Coffee and also through Patreon.
30:44To those who are helping support my work, whether it's a one-time donation, donations month to month,
30:49or if you have no resources to spare and you're just helping share my work with others,
30:54all of that is greatly appreciated. That is what helps me continue doing this work. That is what
30:59makes it possible. So thank you. And as always, thank you for watching.