Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 4/10/2025
The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on Thursday on daylight saving time.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00:00Good morning, everyone. Welcome back, Senator Scott. Good to see you.
00:00:06The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation will come to order.
00:00:10Twice a year, we find ourselves adjusting our clocks, shifting an hour of daylight forward in the spring,
00:00:17springing forward, and falling back in the fall.
00:00:20For many Americans, this biannual ritual is a minor inconvenience, something we endure without giving it much thought.
00:00:28But when we take a closer look at the implications of changing the clocks,
00:00:33its impact on our economy, our health, and our everyday lives,
00:00:37we can see that this practice is more than an annoyance.
00:00:41First, let's talk about energy savings, which has long been the most common justification for daylight savings time.
00:00:48The original idea behind daylight savings time was to reduce energy consumption
00:00:52by making better use of daylight during the longer days of summer.
00:00:56The idea was simple.
00:00:58Fewer hours of darkness meant less electricity consumption for lighting and heating.
00:01:04This concept might have made sense in the early 20th century,
00:01:07when our economy and our homes relied much more heavily on energy consumption tied to daylight hours.
00:01:14Today, the data show energy savings from daylight savings time are de minimis, if not entirely non-existent.
00:01:23Advances in technology, particularly in lighting and climate control,
00:01:27and increased domestic energy production have drastically reduced the relative price of energy compared to the past.
00:01:35Changing clocks biannually impacts our health.
00:01:40Research has shown that the abrupt shift in time, especially the spring transition,
00:01:44when we lose an hour of sleep, disrupts our internal circadian rhythms, and causes sleep deprivation.
00:01:52This leads to increased risks of health problems, including higher rates of heart attacks, strokes,
00:01:58and even car accidents immediately following the time change.
00:02:03In fact, studies have shown that there is a spike in workplace injuries and fatal car crashes
00:02:08during the days after we shift our clocks forward.
00:02:12The disruption to sleep patterns and the resultant fatigue
00:02:15can have consequences on our productivity, mental health, and well-being.
00:02:23The time change is also an inconvenience for families.
00:02:27For parents, especially those with young children,
00:02:31adjusting to the time change is no simple task.
00:02:33Sleep disruptions can result in cranky children, restless nights,
00:02:38and a difficult adjustment period that can last for weeks.
00:02:42We also need to consider the economic and social impact.
00:02:46There are arguments that longer daylight hours in the evening
00:02:49can boost economic activity in certain sectors,
00:02:53such as retail, tourism, and entertainment.
00:02:56For instance, late afternoon golf leagues
00:02:59account for up to 40% of the annual revenue of some courses,
00:03:04while a majority of golf instructors reported
00:03:07that nearly 50% of their lessons are taught after 4 p.m.
00:03:12A golf course would lose an estimated $500,000 annually
00:03:17if it lost the extra hour of daylight in the summer.
00:03:21Of course, the early birds, who like 7 a.m. tea times,
00:03:25might be a bit annoyed with this shift.
00:03:27Many states and countries like Mexico and Russia and Turkey
00:03:32have already taken steps to move away
00:03:34from changing clocks twice a year.
00:03:37Hawaii and Arizona have opted out of the practice,
00:03:40and other countries in the past 10 years
00:03:42have either abolished it or are in the process of doing so.
00:03:46Congress has the authority to end this outdated and harmful practice.
00:03:51This hearing is an excellent opportunity
00:03:53to examine a thoughtful and rational approach
00:03:56to how we manage time.
00:03:58Whether we lock the clock on standard time year-round
00:04:02or on daylight savings time,
00:04:05let's think carefully about our health,
00:04:09our economy, and well-being,
00:04:11and embrace a sensible approach to time management.
00:04:14And I'll now turn to Senator Blunt-Rochester for her opening.
00:04:19Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding this important hearing.
00:04:24In our increasingly connected world,
00:04:27it's more important than ever that we're thoughtful
00:04:30about what it would mean to pick a permanent time for our country.
00:04:34The Senate has tried this before,
00:04:37but the bill stalled as this body took a harder look
00:04:41at how time changes work state by state.
00:04:44What works in my home state of Delaware
00:04:46may not work in Washington state.
00:04:49But I know I speak for many Americans
00:04:51when I say it's time, it's time to figure this out.
00:04:57People across our country are tired of the constant cycle
00:05:01of falling back and springing forward.
00:05:04I mean, who hasn't forgotten to change their clock
00:05:07on their microwave?
00:05:08I think mine is still on the wrong time.
00:05:11And felt the immediate panic of waking up late for work.
00:05:16Or think about the parents of young children and pet owners
00:05:19who have to adjust sleep and feeding schedules twice a year.
00:05:24Some would say that these are just inconveniences.
00:05:28But the back and forth between daylight savings time
00:05:31and standard time needs to change and needs to stop.
00:05:36We need to stop the clock.
00:05:38We need to find a solution and stick with it.
00:05:42Many states across our nation have started
00:05:45to consider legislation to pick a permanent time.
00:05:48Some, like Delaware, have pushed for keeping
00:05:51daylight saving time.
00:05:53The time we're in right now, permanently.
00:05:57Others have sought to keep the standard time.
00:06:00When we fall back, permanently.
00:06:03But here's the thing.
00:06:05These twice yearly time changes have real impacts on real people.
00:06:10We know that changing the clock disrupts sleep,
00:06:13which can lead to negative health outcomes.
00:06:16Several studies have noted issues with mood disturbances,
00:06:20increased hospital admissions,
00:06:22and even heart attacks and strokes.
00:06:25We also know that being able to see the sun improves mental
00:06:29and physical health as well.
00:06:31But more than that, time changes can impact the safety of our communities.
00:06:36Darker commuting times increase the risk of injuries
00:06:40and even death on our way to school or work.
00:06:43My home state has one of the highest per capita rates of pedestrian fatalities.
00:06:50And dark roads with tired drivers make it more dangerous for pedestrians.
00:06:54The important thing is that we land on something consistent
00:06:58and make smart investments to keep people safe.
00:07:03For example, there were programs that we authorized
00:07:06in the bipartisan infrastructure law
00:07:08that focused on common sense safety improvements.
00:07:11But they are set to expire this Congress.
00:07:14I hope the committee will keep this discussion in mind
00:07:18when it comes time to reauthorize these infrastructure investments.
00:07:22Investments that could keep light,
00:07:24or that could light up dark streets,
00:07:27add rumble strips to medians,
00:07:29turn chaotic intersections into roundabouts and more.
00:07:33These are the kinds of smart policy choices
00:07:35we can make to protect people year-round,
00:07:38regardless of whether it is daylight saving time
00:07:42or standard time.
00:07:44But the first step is getting us all on the same page.
00:07:48I'm looking forward to today's conversation
00:07:50about the competing health, safety, and economic impacts
00:07:54of choosing a permanent time for our communities
00:07:57and moving the ball forward on this important issue.
00:08:01Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:08:02And I turn it back to you.
00:08:05Thank you, Senator Blunt-Rochester.
00:08:07And I have to say, I think you've set a land speed record
00:08:09for moving from the chair on the end all the way here.
00:08:13And I'll just say, Senator Cantwell probably needs to watch her back.
00:08:18And I am somewhat disappointed in your excellent remarks
00:08:22that we did not get you belting out the chorus of shares
00:08:27if we could turn back time.
00:08:28I told you, it is something that peps us up.
00:08:33We need the energy.
00:08:35Joining us today is our friend Senator Rick Scott
00:08:38from the Sunshine State
00:08:40to give remarks on his legislation,
00:08:43the Sunshine Protection Act.
00:08:44Senator Scott, welcome back to the Commerce Committee.
00:08:47First off, Senator Cruz, thank you for the opportunity.
00:08:51And Senator Blunt-Rochester,
00:08:53you've done a better job keeping your sweetness
00:08:54in this committee also that I was able to.
00:08:59Thanks for the introduction.
00:09:00The invitation introduced by Bill,
00:09:01the Sunshine Protection Act,
00:09:02to finally lock the clock.
00:09:04Senator Cruz, I know you're mourning.
00:09:07It's been a tough week for you
00:09:08with the NCAA championship.
00:09:11I do look forward to the-
00:09:12Your time has expired.
00:09:13All right.
00:09:17My bipartisan bike arm was Sunshine Protection Act.
00:09:20It will end the twice-yearly time change
00:09:22and make daylight savings time
00:09:24the national year-round standard.
00:09:26I have the support of 17 of my colleagues
00:09:28here in the Senate
00:09:29and a House companion led by my friend,
00:09:30Congressman Verne Buchanan
00:09:32from the great state of Florida.
00:09:33I'm sure all of us have heard
00:09:35from our constituents on this.
00:09:37The American people are sick and tired
00:09:38of changing their clocks twice a year.
00:09:40It's confusing, unnecessary,
00:09:42and completely outdated.
00:09:44It's an understatement to say
00:09:45that our nation has changed
00:09:46since the United States began
00:09:47changing the clock over a century ago.
00:09:50For example, American households
00:09:51have electricity now.
00:09:53We also have self-driving cars,
00:09:54computers, and cell phones.
00:09:56Now, changing the clocks twice a year
00:09:58proves more of an annoyance to families
00:09:59than a benefit to them.
00:10:01In 2018, when I was governor of Florida,
00:10:03I signed legislation that would allow
00:10:05the state to opt out of the practice
00:10:06of changing the time.
00:10:07And nearly two dozen other states
00:10:10have done the same,
00:10:11pending federal approval
00:10:12that will come by passing
00:10:13the Sunshine Protection Act.
00:10:16The American people love
00:10:16having an extra hour of sunlight,
00:10:18especially in my state of Florida,
00:10:20where that means more time
00:10:21you can enjoy outdoors
00:10:22and activities with families.
00:10:25Studies also show the potential
00:10:26for reduced cardiac issues,
00:10:28stroke, and seasonal depression,
00:10:29reduced robberies,
00:10:31benefits to the agricultural
00:10:32and overall economy
00:10:33with an extra hour of sunlight.
00:10:34This is a common-sense change
00:10:36to simplify and benefit
00:10:38the lives of Americans.
00:10:39And we have a great opportunity
00:10:40to finally get this done
00:10:41with President Trump on board
00:10:43to lock the clock.
00:10:45I want to thank the committee
00:10:46for the consideration
00:10:47of the Sunshine Protection Act.
00:10:48I'm optimistic
00:10:49we can get this passed,
00:10:52sign in the law,
00:10:52and finally lock the clock.
00:10:54Thank you, Senator Scott.
00:10:59You are welcome to stay
00:11:01if you like,
00:11:02but I know you have
00:11:02a busy schedule,
00:11:03so if you need to attend
00:11:04to other responsibilities,
00:11:05you certainly can do so.
00:11:10And the game was great,
00:11:11except for the final minute.
00:11:13I would have liked to lock the clock
00:11:14with one minute remaining.
00:11:16That would have been
00:11:17an excellent idea.
00:11:19Our first witness this morning
00:11:21is Scott Yates,
00:11:22the founder of the
00:11:22Lock the Clock movement.
00:11:23Mr. Yates started the movement
00:11:25to remove the biannual chore
00:11:27of changing the clock.
00:11:29Our second witness is Jay Karin.
00:11:31He is the CEO
00:11:32of the National Golf Course
00:11:34Owners Association,
00:11:35where he represents
00:11:36thousands of golf course owners
00:11:38across the country.
00:11:39Our third witness today
00:11:40is Dr. Karin Johnson,
00:11:42a practicing sleep medicine physician
00:11:44and professor of neurology
00:11:46at the University of Massachusetts
00:11:48Chan School of Medicine,
00:11:49Bay State.
00:11:50She is here on behalf
00:11:51of the American Academy
00:11:53of Sleep Medicine.
00:11:54Our final witness
00:11:55is Dr. David Harkey.
00:11:57Dr. Harkey is the president
00:11:58of the Insurance Institute
00:12:00for Highway Safety,
00:12:02which is an organization
00:12:03dedicated to reducing deaths,
00:12:05injuries,
00:12:06and property damage
00:12:07from motor vehicle crashes.
00:12:10Mr. Yates,
00:12:10you may give your opening statement.
00:12:13Thank you so much,
00:12:14Chairman Cruz,
00:12:14ranking member of Blunt Rochester
00:12:16and members
00:12:17of the United States
00:12:18Commerce Committee.
00:12:19Thank you for inviting me here today.
00:12:22Allow me to start
00:12:23with a hypothetical.
00:12:24Imagine two people
00:12:26commit the exact same crime
00:12:28on the exact same day,
00:12:30and they are the same
00:12:31in every way,
00:12:32but today one of them
00:12:33is out of prison,
00:12:34and one of them
00:12:35remains behind bars.
00:12:37What is the difference?
00:12:38The second man
00:12:39was sentenced on the Monday
00:12:40after we spring forward
00:12:42into daylight saving time.
00:12:44Researchers at the University
00:12:45of Washington reviewed
00:12:46every criminal sentence
00:12:47handed down in America
00:12:48over an 11-year period
00:12:49and found the single
00:12:50harshest day of sentencing
00:12:51of the whole year
00:12:52was that Monday in March
00:12:53when judges,
00:12:55like all of us,
00:12:55had been jolted awake
00:12:56an hour earlier
00:12:57than their bodies
00:12:57had been expecting.
00:12:59That one seemingly harmless
00:13:00government mandate,
00:13:02dialing our clocks back
00:13:03one hour,
00:13:04means some people
00:13:04receive harsher sentences
00:13:05than they otherwise would.
00:13:08The harm doesn't stop there.
00:13:09Both of your opening statements
00:13:11alluded to all of the problems
00:13:12that we have,
00:13:13and peer-reviewed studies
00:13:14consistently show
00:13:14that heart attacks go up,
00:13:15strokes, car crashes,
00:13:17even miscarriages spike
00:13:18in those days
00:13:18following the spring switch.
00:13:20A study from the University
00:13:21of Vienna found
00:13:22deaths overall
00:13:23just increased by 3%
00:13:25in those couple of days
00:13:26after the change.
00:13:27Medical errors go up,
00:13:29diabetics lose glucose control,
00:13:31crime goes up.
00:13:32Just yesterday,
00:13:33the journal Neurology
00:13:34published a report
00:13:35saying that more people
00:13:35get migraines
00:13:36in the days after
00:13:37the time change.
00:13:38And why do we do this?
00:13:40For the farmers?
00:13:41No.
00:13:42The story about the farmers
00:13:43was always just a myth.
00:13:44It was created as a PR stunt
00:13:45by a retailer in Boston
00:13:47who wanted more daylight
00:13:48for shoppers to have
00:13:49more time to shop.
00:13:50He thought it would sound better
00:13:51if we said it was for the farmers.
00:13:53If changing the time
00:13:55twice a year is so deadly
00:13:56and such an outdated relic,
00:13:58why haven't we fixed it yet?
00:14:01It's probably because
00:14:02of this issue we face
00:14:03about whether we should
00:14:04lock into permanent daylight
00:14:05or permanent standard time.
00:14:07I've seen countless polls
00:14:08and I've talked to thousands
00:14:09of people about this.
00:14:10Most people don't actually
00:14:11prefer one or the other
00:14:12that much.
00:14:13They just want to stop
00:14:14the switching.
00:14:15There are valid arguments
00:14:16for either permanent choice.
00:14:18So what should Congress do?
00:14:19What should this committee do?
00:14:20My name is Scott Yates.
00:14:21I've been reading, writing,
00:14:23and testifying about this
00:14:24for nearly a decade
00:14:25and I have this recommendation.
00:14:27Lock the clock,
00:14:28as this bill says,
00:14:29but after a two-year implementation.
00:14:32If we wait until 2027,
00:14:35we'll continue to allow states
00:14:37to opt out and opt into standard time
00:14:39just as Hawaii
00:14:40and most of Arizona have done.
00:14:42This is fundamentally
00:14:44a states' rights issue
00:14:45and a geography issue.
00:14:47Consider Indiana.
00:14:50Indianapolis is roughly
00:14:51the same latitude
00:14:52as New York City,
00:14:53but about 700 miles west.
00:14:55For Congress to force Hoosiers
00:14:56to walk, to go to work
00:14:58and school in the dark
00:14:59only to accommodate barbecues
00:15:01in New York City seems rude.
00:15:03But as the Commerce Committee,
00:15:05you do have an interest
00:15:06in promoting a stable
00:15:07and predictable environment
00:15:08for commerce.
00:15:10That's why I suggest Congress
00:15:11establish a firm date, 2027,
00:15:13to permanently end
00:15:14the clock changing nationwide.
00:15:16States would then have ample time
00:15:17to decide if they want to
00:15:18remain in daylight time
00:15:20or opt out and pick standard time.
00:15:23They wouldn't have the option
00:15:24to continue deadly
00:15:25twice-yearly switching.
00:15:27With clear federal guidance,
00:15:28schools can evaluate
00:15:29and pick their own bell times.
00:15:31Businesses can plan confidently,
00:15:32free from the confusion
00:15:33caused by time changes.
00:15:34And states would even have time
00:15:35to hold elections
00:15:36to let the people decide directly.
00:15:39I started my remarks
00:15:40with that study about the judges.
00:15:42The reason researchers
00:15:42could do that
00:15:43and find so many other ways
00:15:45that the time change is harmful
00:15:47is DSC creates
00:15:48what scientists call
00:15:48a natural experiment.
00:15:50Scientists can compare
00:15:51real-world results
00:15:52about what happens
00:15:53when the time changes.
00:15:56Interestingly,
00:15:56in traditional experiments
00:15:58with lab rats,
00:16:00scientists are careful
00:16:00not to change the clocks
00:16:02for daylight saving time
00:16:03for the rats
00:16:04because it's too disruptive.
00:16:06So my closing question
00:16:08for you today is this.
00:16:09At long last,
00:16:10can we treat our citizens
00:16:12with the decency
00:16:13that we treat our lab rats?
00:16:15Thank you,
00:16:16and I'm open to any questions.
00:16:18Thank you, Mr. Yates,
00:16:19for very interesting testimony.
00:16:20Mr. Caron.
00:16:22Good morning, everyone.
00:16:23Thank you, Chairman Cruz,
00:16:24Senator Blunt-Rochester,
00:16:25and members of the committee
00:16:26for asking me
00:16:27to enter testimony
00:16:28on behalf of the members
00:16:29of the National Golf Course
00:16:30Owners Association
00:16:31on a pretty complex issue.
00:16:34We are headquartered
00:16:35in Charleston, South Carolina
00:16:36and represent approximately
00:16:374,000 public courses,
00:16:39private clubs,
00:16:40municipal courses,
00:16:41and resorts
00:16:41throughout the United States.
00:16:43A little bit about
00:16:44the golf economy.
00:16:45Many elected friends
00:16:47see golf simply as a game
00:16:48until it's time
00:16:50to talk about taxes,
00:16:51land use, water,
00:16:53employment matters,
00:16:54tourism, zoning, etc.
00:16:55What comes into view
00:16:57is a $102 billion industry
00:16:59employing nearly
00:17:002 million people
00:17:01across 15,000 properties
00:17:03and 2 million acres of land
00:17:05so that nearly
00:17:0730 million Americans
00:17:08can enjoy a great walk
00:17:09outdoors with strangers,
00:17:11friends, and family
00:17:13while hitting
00:17:13a little white ball.
00:17:15Little known fact,
00:17:1675% of golf courses
00:17:18in America
00:17:18are open to the public
00:17:19and nearly $5 billion
00:17:21each year is raised
00:17:23for charitable causes
00:17:24through golf.
00:17:26I also understand
00:17:27golf outings can be
00:17:28an effective fundraiser
00:17:29for political campaigns.
00:17:31The health benefits
00:17:32of golf are well documented
00:17:33so we tend to vehemently
00:17:36disagree with Mark Twain's
00:17:37assessment of golf
00:17:38as a good walk spoiled.
00:17:40Now, about the clock.
00:17:42Locking the clock
00:17:43doesn't change
00:17:44how much daylight we have
00:17:46just where it shows up
00:17:47on the clock.
00:17:48For golf
00:17:48and many outdoor activities
00:17:49a shift can have
00:17:50significant economic
00:17:52and wellness implications.
00:17:54Golf thrives
00:17:55in what we call
00:17:55recreational daylight,
00:17:57the overlap of sunlight
00:17:58and people's availability
00:18:00to be outdoors.
00:18:02Americans overwhelmingly
00:18:03prefer evening recreation
00:18:05over early morning.
00:18:07This isn't just about golf,
00:18:08it's about soccer,
00:18:09jogging, walking,
00:18:11biking, tennis,
00:18:12and so much more.
00:18:13Making standard time
00:18:15permanent would shift
00:18:16one hour per day
00:18:17from recreational
00:18:18to non-recreational
00:18:19daylight.
00:18:20Simplistically,
00:18:21it trades 8 p.m.
00:18:22for 8 a.m.
00:18:24At golf courses,
00:18:25later hours generate
00:18:27about 40% more revenue
00:18:28per hour
00:18:29than early mornings.
00:18:31Trading backwards
00:18:31would cost the average
00:18:33public golf course
00:18:34at least 7 to 8%
00:18:35of their annual revenue
00:18:37by removing the best inventory
00:18:38we have from
00:18:39on our shelves,
00:18:40which is approximately
00:18:4137 million rounds of golf,
00:18:43and would cost the industry
00:18:44at least $1.6 billion
00:18:46or nearly $200,000
00:18:48per course.
00:18:50This analysis
00:18:50only includes
00:18:52green fee revenue
00:18:52and does not include
00:18:53spending on golf car rentals,
00:18:55merchandise,
00:18:56food and beverage,
00:18:56golf lessons,
00:18:57and other areas
00:18:58of the business.
00:18:59Thus, only 7%
00:19:00of our members
00:19:01support making
00:19:03standard time permanent.
00:19:04Those who favor
00:19:05standard time year-round
00:19:06say their morning play
00:19:07is more valuable to them
00:19:09than their afternoon play.
00:19:11These may be resorts
00:19:12that want players
00:19:12off the course
00:19:13and in the restaurants
00:19:14at a reasonable hour.
00:19:16Now, making daylight
00:19:18saving time permanent
00:19:19would provide additional
00:19:20recreational daylight
00:19:22from November to March
00:19:23and would add
00:19:23an estimated 23 million rounds
00:19:26to the current golf inventory.
00:19:28This would give the industry
00:19:29a tailwind of about
00:19:30$1 billion
00:19:31or roughly $250,000
00:19:33per affected facility.
00:19:3564% of our members
00:19:37support making
00:19:38daylight saving time permanent.
00:19:40The status quo,
00:19:41changing of our clocks
00:19:42twice per year,
00:19:43avoids both
00:19:44the significant downside
00:19:45while forfeiting
00:19:46the moderate upside.
00:19:4827% of golf course
00:19:50owners and operators
00:19:50support keeping
00:19:51the status quo
00:19:52of changing the clocks.
00:19:54Many golf courses
00:19:55slow down in the winter
00:19:56and enjoy having
00:19:57some relief later in the day
00:19:58for their employees
00:19:59with the sun setting earlier.
00:20:01Or, they may have
00:20:02a healthy clientele
00:20:04of older players
00:20:05who would prefer
00:20:05no disruption
00:20:06to their 7 a.m. tea time
00:20:08or their 11 o'clock
00:20:09bridge game.
00:20:10Keep in mind,
00:20:11all these figures
00:20:12do not include
00:20:13thousands of private clubs
00:20:14which would augment
00:20:15the impacts
00:20:16in both directions
00:20:17by an enormous sum.
00:20:19In conclusion,
00:20:20the Senate is facing
00:20:21a classic Gordian knot.
00:20:23There will be winners
00:20:24and losers
00:20:25no matter which way
00:20:25the knot is cut.
00:20:27But our members
00:20:28clearly prefer
00:20:29daylight saving time
00:20:30and strongly oppose
00:20:31permanent standard time.
00:20:33We recognize the sleep-related
00:20:35arguments for standard time,
00:20:36but the benefits
00:20:37of extended daylight
00:20:38for physical and mental health,
00:20:39outdoor recreation,
00:20:41and public safety
00:20:42are significant.
00:20:43Obesity, depression,
00:20:44and crime
00:20:45all have ties
00:20:46to reduced daylight
00:20:47and sedentary lifestyles.
00:20:49So, in short,
00:20:50we urge the Senate
00:20:51to avoid the consequences
00:20:52of permanent standard time.
00:20:54We encourage solutions
00:20:55that preserve
00:20:56evening daylight
00:20:57for golf,
00:20:58for health,
00:20:59for recreation,
00:21:00and local economies.
00:21:04Dr. Johnson.
00:21:06Chairman Cruz,
00:21:07Senator Blunt-Rochester,
00:21:08distinguished members
00:21:09of the Senate.
00:21:10Thank you for having me.
00:21:11My name is Dr. Karin Johnson.
00:21:13State, I'm a neurologist
00:21:14and practicing
00:21:15sleep medicine specialist
00:21:16in Massachusetts
00:21:18and am here representing
00:21:19the American Academy
00:21:20of Sleep Medicine.
00:21:22I want to extend
00:21:23my gratitude
00:21:23to Chairman Cruz
00:21:24for having this
00:21:25timely committee hearing.
00:21:28In December,
00:21:29President Trump
00:21:30called to end
00:21:31daylight savings time
00:21:32and his
00:21:32Make America Healthy
00:21:33Commission's mandate
00:21:34to reduce chronic diseases,
00:21:36especially in children,
00:21:38aligns with
00:21:39permanent standard time.
00:21:40Unfortunately,
00:21:41permanent daylight saving time
00:21:43and the Sunshine Protection Act
00:21:44do the opposite.
00:21:46So I have three main takeaways.
00:21:47First,
00:21:48the spring clock change
00:21:49to daylight saving time
00:21:51is bad,
00:21:52but permanent
00:21:53daylight savings time
00:21:54is worse.
00:21:55Second,
00:21:56year-round standard time
00:21:57is the natural,
00:21:58healthy choice
00:21:59promoting physical health,
00:22:01mental health,
00:22:02performance,
00:22:03and safety.
00:22:04Third,
00:22:05history supports
00:22:06that permanent standard time
00:22:08is the only viable solution
00:22:09to end seasonal clock change.
00:22:11So let me elaborate.
00:22:13The majority of Americans
00:22:14do consistently
00:22:15want to lock the clock,
00:22:17but it has been more
00:22:18inconsistent
00:22:19about how to ditch
00:22:20the switch.
00:22:21But in March,
00:22:22there was a
00:22:23new Gallup poll
00:22:25that just showed
00:22:27a significant shift
00:22:28in public opinion
00:22:29with twice as many
00:22:30Americans
00:22:31now supporting
00:22:32permanent standard time
00:22:33over permanent
00:22:34daylight savings time.
00:22:3660% of Americans
00:22:38and 80% of teens
00:22:39don't get the recommended
00:22:41amount of sleep,
00:22:42so there's a lot of room
00:22:43to improve sleep.
00:22:45Think about how you,
00:22:46your children,
00:22:47feel after a bad night
00:22:48of sleep.
00:22:49Maybe you forgot
00:22:50an important meeting,
00:22:51drifted out of your lane,
00:22:52eating that extra bowl
00:22:53of ice cream.
00:22:55I know I've done
00:22:56those things.
00:22:57You may have struggled
00:22:58to get your teenager
00:22:59out of bed
00:23:00or been a little short
00:23:01with your husband.
00:23:02Now, instead,
00:23:05think about how much
00:23:06better you feel
00:23:07and function
00:23:08after a good night's sleep.
00:23:10Permanent standard time
00:23:11would give more Americans
00:23:12to get the opportunity
00:23:13to improve their sleep
00:23:15without even trying.
00:23:17The sun is one
00:23:18of the most powerful
00:23:19drivers of health
00:23:20and well-being,
00:23:21but the timing of sunlight
00:23:22is what's critically important.
00:23:24Without enough
00:23:25morning light
00:23:26or with too much
00:23:27evening light,
00:23:27our circadian rhythms
00:23:28delay.
00:23:29This disrupts
00:23:30our sleep patterns
00:23:31and our body
00:23:32and brain functions.
00:23:34Permanent daylight savings time
00:23:35would cause sunrises
00:23:36after 8 a.m.
00:23:37for two to four months
00:23:39every winter,
00:23:40depriving us
00:23:40of this critical
00:23:41morning light.
00:23:42This is why
00:23:43permanent daylight saving time
00:23:45would be exponentially worse
00:23:47than seasonal
00:23:48daylight saving time.
00:23:50The adverse effects
00:23:51are greatest
00:23:52in our children,
00:23:53our teenagers,
00:23:54and other night owls
00:23:55who bodies' clocks
00:23:56already run late.
00:23:57as discussed,
00:23:59there are many
00:24:00harmful benefits
00:24:01that occur
00:24:01in the days
00:24:02after this change,
00:24:04especially in the spring
00:24:05to daylight savings time,
00:24:06including more strokes
00:24:07and heart attacks.
00:24:09As highlighted
00:24:10in the prior testimony,
00:24:12brain function
00:24:13is really affected
00:24:15by sleep,
00:24:16and so,
00:24:16you know,
00:24:17we heard about judges
00:24:18making harsher
00:24:19statements.
00:24:20However,
00:24:22these harms
00:24:23does not mean
00:24:25that permanent
00:24:26daylight savings time
00:24:27would be better.
00:24:28Instead,
00:24:29the later sunrises
00:24:30and sunsets
00:24:31of daylight savings time
00:24:32lead to higher risks
00:24:33of chronic diseases,
00:24:35including,
00:24:35but not limited to,
00:24:36cancer,
00:24:37diabetes,
00:24:38heart disease,
00:24:39obesity,
00:24:40and these outweigh
00:24:41the short-term risks
00:24:42of what happens
00:24:43with the time change.
00:24:45There's also data
00:24:46that says
00:24:46that permanent
00:24:47standard time
00:24:48also results
00:24:49in better
00:24:50mental health outcomes,
00:24:51including reducing
00:24:52rates of depression
00:24:53and suicide.
00:24:55This is not surprising
00:24:56as morning light
00:24:57and healthy sleep
00:24:58are known treatments
00:24:59for depression.
00:25:00On the other hand,
00:25:02poor sleep
00:25:02increases the risk
00:25:03of drug use,
00:25:05alcohol use,
00:25:05and other risk-taking behaviors.
00:25:08There are some
00:25:09misconceptions
00:25:09I want to address.
00:25:11As discussed,
00:25:11permanent
00:25:12daylight savings time
00:25:12does not make days longer,
00:25:14nor is it the reason
00:25:15why people feel better
00:25:16in the summer.
00:25:17Instead,
00:25:18permanent
00:25:19daylight savings time
00:25:20is a hidden mandate
00:25:21to wake Americans
00:25:22up an hour earlier
00:25:24to their alarm clocks
00:25:27rather than the sun.
00:25:28If we called it
00:25:29the go-to-work
00:25:30an hour earlier act
00:25:31rather than
00:25:32the Sunshine Protection Act,
00:25:33no one would be
00:25:34voting for it.
00:25:35Permanent
00:25:36daylight savings time
00:25:37does not increase
00:25:38overall exercise levels
00:25:39in the U.S.,
00:25:40and even if some people
00:25:42exercise more,
00:25:43obesity and heart disease,
00:25:44these chronic diseases
00:25:45are still more prevalent.
00:25:47while darkness
00:25:50comes with health
00:25:51and safety risks,
00:25:53daylight savings time
00:25:53is not the solution.
00:25:55There is no data
00:25:56to support
00:25:56that permanent
00:25:57daylight savings time
00:25:58would reduce
00:25:59overall crime
00:26:00or motor vehicle crashes.
00:26:02Instead,
00:26:02later sunrises
00:26:03and sunsets
00:26:04are associated
00:26:05with 20% more
00:26:06fatal crashes.
00:26:08The negative impact
00:26:09of daylight savings time
00:26:10on sleep
00:26:11and our brain health
00:26:12harms the economy.
00:26:13Workers,
00:26:14especially those
00:26:15with early start times
00:26:16before 8.30,
00:26:17think of your farmers,
00:26:18your transportation workers,
00:26:19your factory workers,
00:26:21are less likely
00:26:22to be productive
00:26:23and efficient.
00:26:24Workplace injuries
00:26:25rise after the transition
00:26:27to daylight savings time
00:26:28and healthcare spending
00:26:29increases.
00:26:30On the other hand,
00:26:31permanent standard time
00:26:32improves academic success
00:26:33in our children
00:26:34with higher test scores.
00:26:36Your constituents'
00:26:37utility bills
00:26:38will be lower
00:26:38with permanent standard time
00:26:40by reducing heating
00:26:41and cooling costs.
00:26:42And finally,
00:26:43the U.S. tried
00:26:43and quickly abandoned
00:26:45permanent daylight savings time
00:26:46twice before,
00:26:47most recently in 1974.
00:26:49It just doesn't work.
00:26:50It won't last.
00:26:52For those that are serious
00:26:53about ending clock changes,
00:26:54permanent standard time
00:26:56is the only viable solution.
00:26:58Please refer to my written testimony
00:26:59for more details
00:27:00and happy to look forward
00:27:01to the questions later.
00:27:04Thank you very much.
00:27:05Dr. Harkey.
00:27:07Chairman Cruz,
00:27:09Ranking Member Blunt Rochester
00:27:10and members of the committee.
00:27:12Thank you for the opportunity
00:27:13to share the IHS research
00:27:15on the road safety implications
00:27:16of daylight saving time.
00:27:18When discussing any topic
00:27:20on road safety
00:27:21in the United States,
00:27:22it is important
00:27:23to set the stage.
00:27:24Simply put,
00:27:25we are in a road safety emergency.
00:27:27Crash deaths have risen
00:27:28nearly 30% since 2014,
00:27:31from below 33,000
00:27:33to more than 42,000
00:27:34in 2022.
00:27:36Pedestrian crashes,
00:27:37in particular,
00:27:38have reached crisis levels.
00:27:40Climbing more than 80%
00:27:41from their low point in 2009.
00:27:45Changing the clocks
00:27:46twice a year
00:27:46is relevant to road safety
00:27:48first and foremost
00:27:48because it affects
00:27:49the amount of ambient light
00:27:51during peak times for travel.
00:27:53We know that darkness
00:27:54is associated
00:27:55with increased risk
00:27:56of fatal crashes.
00:27:58We do about a quarter
00:27:59of our travel at night,
00:28:01but nearly half
00:28:01of motor vehicle
00:28:02occupant deaths
00:28:03and three quarters
00:28:04of pedestrian deaths
00:28:06occur in the dark.
00:28:06obviously adjusting
00:28:08the clock
00:28:09cannot increase
00:28:10the number
00:28:10of daylight hours,
00:28:11but can only shift
00:28:12how they align
00:28:13with work
00:28:14and school schedules.
00:28:16Since people travel
00:28:17at all times of day
00:28:18and the risk created
00:28:19by darkness
00:28:20varies by road user type,
00:28:22the effects
00:28:23of these time changes
00:28:24on crashes
00:28:24are complex.
00:28:26The aim
00:28:27of our recent study
00:28:28was to examine
00:28:29the effect of changes
00:28:30in light conditions
00:28:31associated with
00:28:32the beginning
00:28:32and the end
00:28:33of daylight saving time.
00:28:35We examined 10 years
00:28:36of fatality data
00:28:37for the five weeks
00:28:38before and after
00:28:38each time change
00:28:39and only considered crashes
00:28:41between 4 a.m. and 10 a.m.
00:28:43and between 3 p.m. and 9 p.m.
00:28:46Ambient light conditions
00:28:47were calculated
00:28:48using the sunrise
00:28:49and sunset times
00:28:50corresponding
00:28:51to the geographic coordinates
00:28:52of each crash.
00:28:55Crashes resulting
00:28:56in vehicle occupant deaths
00:28:57fell 7%
00:28:58in the five weeks
00:28:59after the time change
00:29:00in the fall
00:29:01and increased 12%
00:29:03in the five weeks
00:29:04after the time change
00:29:05in the spring.
00:29:07The opposite
00:29:08was true
00:29:08for crashes
00:29:08resulting in pedestrian
00:29:10or bicyclist deaths.
00:29:11Those crashes
00:29:12rose 13%
00:29:13in the fall
00:29:14and declined
00:29:1624%
00:29:17in the spring.
00:29:19The net effect
00:29:20was 26
00:29:21fewer morning
00:29:23and evening crashes
00:29:24with pedestrian
00:29:25or bicyclist fatalities
00:29:26per year
00:29:27and 29
00:29:28additional
00:29:29morning
00:29:30and evening crashes
00:29:31with vehicle occupant fatalities.
00:29:33It is important
00:29:34to emphasize
00:29:35that our study
00:29:35does not point
00:29:36to a preference
00:29:38for standard time
00:29:39or daylight saving time
00:29:40based on road safety alone.
00:29:43The clearest takeaway
00:29:44from this research
00:29:46is that there is
00:29:47a strong relationship
00:29:48between increased darkness
00:29:50and fatal crashes,
00:29:52particularly for pedestrians
00:29:53and bicyclists.
00:29:55This is consistent
00:29:56with previous studies,
00:29:57including our own work
00:29:58from 30 years ago
00:30:00examining the effects
00:30:01of daylight saving time.
00:30:03While the clock
00:30:04may not hold the answer
00:30:05to our road safety crisis,
00:30:06there are known solutions
00:30:07for protecting pedestrians
00:30:09in dark
00:30:09and low-light conditions
00:30:10and for reducing
00:30:11the crash toll overall.
00:30:13We should commit
00:30:14to infrastructure
00:30:15and vehicle improvements
00:30:17that have been shown
00:30:17to increase safety
00:30:18for pedestrians
00:30:19and bicyclists
00:30:20on different types
00:30:20of roadways
00:30:21in urban, suburban,
00:30:23and rural environments.
00:30:24This includes
00:30:26engineering treatments
00:30:26to improve motor shielding behavior
00:30:28and vehicle technology
00:30:30such as better headlights
00:30:31and automatic emergency braking.
00:30:34Efforts are also needed
00:30:35to address speed
00:30:36on our roadways.
00:30:38The speed effect
00:30:39on crash severity
00:30:40is more pronounced
00:30:41for pedestrians
00:30:42and bicyclists
00:30:42who do not have the benefit
00:30:44of the vehicle structure
00:30:45to protect them.
00:30:47Speed limit policy,
00:30:49enforcement,
00:30:50engineering,
00:30:50and vehicle technology
00:30:51all have a role to play
00:30:53in slowing down drivers.
00:30:55Such a multi-pronged strategy
00:30:57to improve pedestrian
00:30:58and bicyclist safety
00:30:59at night
00:31:00exemplifies the safe system approach,
00:31:03which the U.S. DOT
00:31:04has adopted
00:31:06as the guiding paradigm
00:31:07of the National Roadway
00:31:08Safety Strategy.
00:31:09But implementation
00:31:10has simply been too slow.
00:31:14We are alarmed
00:31:15by the rising toll
00:31:15of crashes
00:31:16on our nation's roads
00:31:17and dismayed
00:31:18by the lack of urgency
00:31:19to fix the problem.
00:31:21For this reason,
00:31:22we recently launched
00:31:23an initiative
00:31:24we are calling 30 by 30,
00:31:26a goal to reduce
00:31:27U.S. fatalities
00:31:2830 percent by 2030.
00:31:31Achieving this reduction
00:31:32will require
00:31:33a concerted effort
00:31:33by all stakeholders.
00:31:35We will increase
00:31:36our efforts
00:31:37to address risky behaviors,
00:31:39seek opportunities
00:31:40to improve safety
00:31:41for everyone
00:31:41inside and outside
00:31:43the vehicle,
00:31:44and explore ways
00:31:45to make commercial
00:31:46vehicle fleets safer.
00:31:48We ask everybody
00:31:49who cares about
00:31:51the needless loss
00:31:52of life on our roadways,
00:31:53including this committee,
00:31:55to think about
00:31:55what they can contribute
00:31:57to achieving
00:31:58the 30 by 30 goal.
00:32:03You'll notice
00:32:03the freshmen
00:32:04have taken over
00:32:05this committee.
00:32:06And we have
00:32:07an agenda,
00:32:09don't we?
00:32:09Yeah.
00:32:10Listen,
00:32:10I'm pleased to be here.
00:32:11John Curtis from Utah.
00:32:13And thank you,
00:32:14panel,
00:32:15for this important topic.
00:32:16And I think
00:32:17it's fair to say
00:32:19that my constituents
00:32:20share the same frustration
00:32:22that's been articulated
00:32:23here by the back and forth.
00:32:25Mr. Yates,
00:32:25you mentioned
00:32:26in your testimony
00:32:27that the only reason
00:32:28we still have
00:32:29this time change
00:32:30every six months
00:32:30is due to the federal
00:32:32government's inability
00:32:33to decide between
00:32:34standard or daylight
00:32:35savings time
00:32:35which one is best.
00:32:37Based on your research
00:32:38and your outreach,
00:32:39do you have any indication
00:32:40how many states
00:32:41would opt out
00:32:42and maintain
00:32:42permanent standard time
00:32:44if your proposal
00:32:45for permanent
00:32:46daylight savings time
00:32:46were enacted?
00:32:48Thank you,
00:32:49Senator,
00:32:49for the question.
00:32:50I don't have
00:32:51a specific answer.
00:32:53I can talk to you
00:32:54about some of
00:32:54the conversations
00:32:55that I've had
00:32:55with state legislators
00:32:56including,
00:32:57I don't know if you know
00:32:58Dr. Raymond Ward
00:32:58in Utah.
00:32:59He was the sponsor
00:33:00of the bill there
00:33:00and he thought
00:33:02and he said
00:33:03all of his constituents
00:33:04told him
00:33:04that the state preferred,
00:33:07that everybody preferred
00:33:08to stay in
00:33:09permanent daylight time
00:33:10in Utah.
00:33:10Utah might be a case
00:33:15where standard time
00:33:16might be a good option
00:33:17and that's why
00:33:17I think the two-year
00:33:18implementation
00:33:19would actually be
00:33:20a great chance
00:33:21for everybody in Utah
00:33:22to look at what
00:33:23So let me jump,
00:33:24let's talk about Utah.
00:33:26You are correct.
00:33:27They've actually
00:33:28passed legislation
00:33:29to stay on
00:33:29permanent daylight
00:33:30savings time
00:33:30and I guess my question
00:33:31is why shouldn't states
00:33:34have the right
00:33:36to make this decision?
00:33:37Don't they know best
00:33:38about what they want
00:33:39for their constituents
00:33:41and why aren't we
00:33:44giving more accommodation
00:33:45to states
00:33:45and particularly Utah
00:33:46who has spoken
00:33:47so vocally
00:33:48about what they would like?
00:33:51I'm sorry, Senator.
00:33:52Are you asking
00:33:53is there a way
00:33:54that the states
00:33:55could opt out of?
00:33:56So my point is
00:33:59states know
00:34:00what's best for them.
00:34:02Right.
00:34:02Some states like Utah
00:34:03clearly have a preference
00:34:05and some would go
00:34:06the other way
00:34:06and I guess my question
00:34:07is now let me tie that
00:34:08into the next question
00:34:10is we could see
00:34:11a patchwork
00:34:12which I suspect
00:34:13might be the answer
00:34:13to that.
00:34:14Now Utah,
00:34:15by the way,
00:34:15we abut Arizona
00:34:17and so my whole life
00:34:18we have watched Arizona
00:34:19mock us
00:34:21as we all change our times
00:34:24and somehow
00:34:25we've navigated
00:34:26that just fine
00:34:27without any problem
00:34:28and then I'd also bring up
00:34:29like technology
00:34:30is in a very,
00:34:31very different place
00:34:32than it was years ago
00:34:33in our ability
00:34:33to adapt to this
00:34:34so do you worry
00:34:34about a patchwork
00:34:36or are we okay
00:34:36with that?
00:34:38Thank you for the question
00:34:39Senator.
00:34:40I think that
00:34:41less complexity
00:34:42in the system
00:34:43is better.
00:34:44It's natural
00:34:45to think that
00:34:46there would be
00:34:46a patchwork
00:34:47if we allowed
00:34:47more states
00:34:48stopped into
00:34:48permanent standard time
00:34:50but we have
00:34:51a patchwork now.
00:34:52What we would be creating
00:34:53is less of a patchwork
00:34:55because the lines
00:34:56might change a little bit
00:34:57for instance
00:34:58Indiana
00:34:59for instance
00:35:00may decide
00:35:00that it's better
00:35:01for the whole state
00:35:02of Indiana
00:35:02to be in
00:35:03central time
00:35:05with Chicago
00:35:05which is a bus
00:35:06and which is
00:35:06a thousand miles
00:35:07from Boston
00:35:08and so
00:35:09it wouldn't create
00:35:10a patchwork
00:35:10it would just create
00:35:11a change
00:35:12in where the line is
00:35:13and so
00:35:13the first
00:35:15and most important
00:35:16thing is
00:35:16decreasing
00:35:17eliminating
00:35:19the clock changing
00:35:20which decreases
00:35:22complexity
00:35:22and then
00:35:23once we've got
00:35:24that stability
00:35:24it won't be
00:35:25a patchwork
00:35:26it'll just be
00:35:26we know what time
00:35:27it is in Indiana
00:35:28because all
00:35:29of the
00:35:29It's the way
00:35:29we've accommodated
00:35:30it to
00:35:30with Arizona
00:35:31Exactly
00:35:32Right
00:35:32and if we're honest
00:35:33we already have
00:35:35these lines
00:35:35and they do
00:35:36just fine
00:35:37and so
00:35:38just for the record
00:35:39I'm a strong
00:35:40advocate to let
00:35:41my state do
00:35:41what they
00:35:42prefer to do
00:35:43and feel like
00:35:44they know how
00:35:45to make those
00:35:45decisions best
00:35:46I'm going to use
00:35:47just a little bit
00:35:48of time
00:35:48for actually
00:35:50a very interesting
00:35:51personal question
00:35:51Dr. Johnson
00:35:52given all the
00:35:54effects that we've
00:35:55heard about
00:35:56what's the likelihood
00:35:58that if somebody
00:35:59had a profession
00:35:59where they were
00:36:00moving across
00:36:01the country
00:36:01twice a week
00:36:03and changing
00:36:03time zones
00:36:04an hour
00:36:04or two
00:36:05hour
00:36:05or sometimes
00:36:05three hours
00:36:06that they would
00:36:08be subject
00:36:09to those
00:36:09same problems
00:36:10So
00:36:12you know
00:36:13a lot of us
00:36:14can relate
00:36:15to jet lag
00:36:15one thing
00:36:17that happens
00:36:17with jet lag
00:36:18is you're moving
00:36:19to a new
00:36:20time
00:36:20where the sun
00:36:21is in the sky
00:36:21and so
00:36:22we adjust
00:36:23to that
00:36:24within a
00:36:24day or two
00:36:25we get
00:36:25to the new
00:36:26time zone
00:36:27depending on
00:36:27how far
00:36:28we're going
00:36:28what happens
00:36:29with going
00:36:30to permanent
00:36:31daylight savings
00:36:32time
00:36:32is we're
00:36:33changing
00:36:33the clock
00:36:34time
00:36:34but we're
00:36:34not changing
00:36:35the sun
00:36:35that's why
00:36:36there's this
00:36:36perpetual
00:36:37misalignment
00:36:38that has
00:36:39more stresses
00:36:40and harms
00:36:41to our body
00:36:42over the long
00:36:42run
00:36:42so very
00:36:44frequent
00:36:45time travel
00:36:46with a lot
00:36:47of adjust
00:36:48is a big
00:36:49strain on the
00:36:49body
00:36:49but for most
00:36:50people that
00:36:51don't do it
00:36:51all the time
00:36:52we do adjust
00:36:53within days
00:36:54and we can
00:36:55get you know
00:36:56that better
00:36:56health
00:36:56and more
00:36:57misalignment
00:36:57or more
00:36:58alignment
00:36:58of our rhythms
00:36:59within days
00:37:00unless within days
00:37:01you're going
00:37:01back to the
00:37:01previous times
00:37:02that that is
00:37:03why the really
00:37:04frequent not good
00:37:05all right I think
00:37:06I've made my point
00:37:06I'll yield to the
00:37:08ranking member
00:37:08thank you to my
00:37:11fellow freshman
00:37:12and classmate
00:37:13senator curtis
00:37:15and also thank you
00:37:17to senator
00:37:17campwell for the
00:37:19opportunity to
00:37:20be ranking member
00:37:21today
00:37:21and I also want
00:37:23to thank the
00:37:23witnesses
00:37:23you know this is
00:37:25one of the issues
00:37:26that a lot of
00:37:27times we will
00:37:29get messages
00:37:29from our
00:37:30constituents
00:37:30people have
00:37:31strong opinions
00:37:33and I was
00:37:34literally in a
00:37:35meeting before
00:37:36this with a
00:37:37CEO of a
00:37:38company who
00:37:38asked well what
00:37:39do you think
00:37:39and so this is
00:37:41something that
00:37:41does touch on
00:37:42so many
00:37:43and I want
00:37:44to start my
00:37:45questions with
00:37:46you Dr.
00:37:47Harkey
00:37:47because year-round
00:37:49daylight saving
00:37:49time would mean
00:37:51later sunrises
00:37:52in the mornings
00:37:53more people may
00:37:55be commuting to
00:37:55work or to
00:37:57school in the
00:37:58dark some
00:37:59people have
00:37:59raised concerns
00:38:00that this would
00:38:02put their
00:38:02children at
00:38:03greater risk of
00:38:03being hit by
00:38:04cars while
00:38:05walking to
00:38:06school pedestrians
00:38:07are more likely
00:38:07to be killed in
00:38:08traffic accidents
00:38:09as you stated
00:38:10in the dark
00:38:11because it's
00:38:11harder for the
00:38:12drivers to see
00:38:13them and in
00:38:14the 1970s it
00:38:15was widely
00:38:15reported that
00:38:16mothers raised
00:38:17significant concerns
00:38:18about their
00:38:18children walking
00:38:19to school in
00:38:20the dark in
00:38:21the winter
00:38:21nationwide over
00:38:2370% of fatal
00:38:25accidents involving
00:38:26pedestrians occur
00:38:27at night
00:38:28Dr.
00:38:29Harkey no matter
00:38:30what time the
00:38:31sun goes down
00:38:32what roadway
00:38:33improvements can
00:38:34cities and states
00:38:35make to reduce
00:38:37pedestrian
00:38:38fatalities
00:38:38things.
00:38:40Thank you for the
00:38:41question senator
00:38:42that is exactly
00:38:45what our study
00:38:46indicated is that
00:38:47it's not about
00:38:48the shifting of
00:38:49the time that
00:38:51we're going to have
00:38:52darkness regardless
00:38:53of which decision
00:38:54you make which
00:38:54policy decision
00:38:55you make and so
00:38:57that's what we're
00:38:58looking for is to
00:38:59try and figure out
00:39:00how do we make
00:39:01pedestrians and
00:39:02bicyclists in
00:39:03particular safer in
00:39:04those dark hours
00:39:05whether they're in the
00:39:06morning or whether
00:39:06in the evening and
00:39:08for most
00:39:10municipalities and
00:39:11county agencies and
00:39:12state DOTs who are
00:39:14struggling to address
00:39:15this issue there's two
00:39:17key things.
00:39:18One is space.
00:39:19We have to provide
00:39:21the appropriate space
00:39:22sidewalks in rural
00:39:24areas that can be
00:39:25separated paths or
00:39:26possibly paved
00:39:27shoulders even.
00:39:29Places for people to
00:39:30walk where they're not
00:39:31in the edge of the
00:39:32travel lane.
00:39:33We also have to take
00:39:34care to provide
00:39:36careful crossings so
00:39:38we have to be, pay
00:39:39particular attention to
00:39:41how we're allowing
00:39:42motor vehicles and
00:39:43pedestrians to interact
00:39:45at crosswalks.
00:39:47These can be at
00:39:48intersections, they can
00:39:48be at mid-block
00:39:49locations so you have
00:39:51to have appropriate
00:39:51crossings.
00:39:53Pedestrians aren't
00:39:54going to walk too far,
00:39:54they're going to make
00:39:55those decisions to cross
00:39:56in the middle of the
00:39:57road sometimes and so
00:39:58you want to make sure
00:39:58that you're providing
00:39:59adequate crossings
00:40:00where they want to
00:40:01cross and then you've
00:40:02got to do all you can
00:40:03to provide the kinds
00:40:06of traffic control
00:40:07devices that will
00:40:08increase motorist
00:40:09yielding behavior.
00:40:10So this includes
00:40:11things like rapid
00:40:12flash beacons which
00:40:14have been shown to
00:40:15increase motorist
00:40:15yielding behavior six
00:40:17fold.
00:40:18You can build on that
00:40:19adding simple things
00:40:21like lights that are
00:40:22triggered when a
00:40:22pedestrian hits the
00:40:23crosswalk area, it
00:40:25will light up that
00:40:26crosswalk, you can
00:40:27double the amount of
00:40:28motorist yielding
00:40:29behavior.
00:40:30So these are
00:40:30interventions that have
00:40:32been proven over time
00:40:33and it's important for
00:40:35state agencies and
00:40:36local agencies to take
00:40:37advantage of those
00:40:38kinds of interventions
00:40:39and get those
00:40:40implemented anywhere
00:40:42that they have
00:40:43pedestrians.
00:40:44Following along on
00:40:45the safety theme,
00:40:46what vehicle technologies
00:40:48can help protect
00:40:49pedestrians when it's
00:40:51difficult for drivers
00:40:52to see them?
00:40:53Yeah, and so this is
00:40:54another important aspect
00:40:55and this is what builds
00:40:56on the safe system
00:40:57approach, right?
00:40:58Building that
00:40:59redundancy into the
00:41:00systems.
00:41:01You don't just rely on
00:41:01the infrastructure,
00:41:02you also build
00:41:03technology into vehicles
00:41:05that can help with
00:41:05this.
00:41:06Two big things that
00:41:07we've studied, one is
00:41:09better headlights.
00:41:11We're the only group
00:41:12in the world that
00:41:12tests headlights the way
00:41:14that we do on our
00:41:15track and so we've
00:41:17seen improvements in
00:41:18headlights over the
00:41:19years that increase
00:41:20visibility and provide
00:41:21drivers with
00:41:22additional time.
00:41:23They can see that
00:41:24pedestrian further down
00:41:25the roadway and so
00:41:27that's a big change
00:41:28and we'll continue to
00:41:29push for that.
00:41:30The other is automatic
00:41:31emergency braking with
00:41:32pedestrian detection.
00:41:33That also has been
00:41:35shown to work and be
00:41:36very effective at
00:41:37reducing pedestrian
00:41:38crashes in the daytime
00:41:39and now our testing is
00:41:41really focused on
00:41:42getting automakers to
00:41:43improve those systems to
00:41:44work even better at
00:41:45nighttime.
00:41:46So that's an example of
00:41:47two technologies in the
00:41:48vehicle that can be
00:41:49really, really
00:41:50beneficial.
00:41:51You know, one of the
00:41:52things that I've
00:41:53noticed is that our
00:41:55safety efforts are
00:41:56siloed.
00:41:57You have the Federal
00:41:59Highway Administration
00:42:00which builds and
00:42:01maintains highways.
00:42:03You have the National
00:42:04Highway Traffic Safety
00:42:06Administration which
00:42:07regulates vehicle safety
00:42:08standards and
00:42:09investigates defects.
00:42:11Then you've got the
00:42:12Federal Motor Carrier
00:42:13Safety Administration
00:42:14which oversees
00:42:15commercial motor
00:42:17vehicles and trucking
00:42:18industry safety all kind
00:42:20of working separately.
00:42:21And I think back to
00:42:24what you were talking
00:42:25about, about kind of
00:42:26how can we better layer
00:42:28safety measures to help
00:42:30stop deadly crashes?
00:42:32Yeah, you're absolutely
00:42:34right.
00:42:34And so build on top of
00:42:35the separation and the
00:42:36Federal agencies that
00:42:37you just discussed.
00:42:39Along with them, you
00:42:40have state DOTs, you
00:42:41have county DOTs, you
00:42:43have city DOTs.
00:42:44And so it becomes quite
00:42:46the web of how you make
00:42:47decisions when it comes
00:42:49to road safety.
00:42:50One of the things that
00:42:51we have to do a better
00:42:53job of is communicating
00:42:55between those agencies
00:42:56deliberately.
00:42:58And so there is no
00:42:59single authority of the
00:43:00ones that you mentioned
00:43:01that has complete
00:43:03authority over every
00:43:04decision on our roadway
00:43:05system when it comes to
00:43:06safety.
00:43:07And so these agencies
00:43:08have to do a better job
00:43:09of communicating together
00:43:11deliberately and not
00:43:12just at the executive
00:43:13level but at the staff
00:43:15level because it's at
00:43:17the staff level where
00:43:18people know what
00:43:19interventions work best
00:43:20and how to apply those
00:43:23in a way that you
00:43:24create that redundancy in
00:43:25the system that we were
00:43:26talking about.
00:43:27So whether it's
00:43:28infrastructure, whether
00:43:29it's vehicle, whether
00:43:30it's changing behaviors,
00:43:32that communication
00:43:33amongst the staff is
00:43:34absolutely critical.
00:43:35Great.
00:43:36And I was really
00:43:37interested to hear about
00:43:39your 30 by 30.
00:43:41So in the interest of
00:43:42time, I will yield back
00:43:43to the chairman.
00:43:44Thank you very much.
00:43:47And I want to thank
00:43:48each of the witnesses for
00:43:49being here on what is a
00:43:51very interesting topic and
00:43:52important topic and
00:43:54complex topic.
00:43:57There are very real and
00:43:59complicated issues and
00:44:01countervailing arguments
00:44:02on both sides.
00:44:04I think there is widespread
00:44:05agreement on locking the
00:44:08clock, but where to lock
00:44:09it, the reason we're
00:44:12holding these hearings is
00:44:13because these are real
00:44:14arguments and they have
00:44:15real, real impacts on
00:44:17people.
00:44:18Let me start on the
00:44:19health side.
00:44:20Dr. Johnson, can you
00:44:22expand on the impact
00:44:23sleep deprivation has on
00:44:26our overall health, on
00:44:27our minds, our moods, and
00:44:28especially on young
00:44:30children for whom we know
00:44:32sleep is so vital?
00:44:33Thank you for asking about
00:44:35that.
00:44:35Yeah, sleep has different
00:44:39aspects.
00:44:39So one is just how much
00:44:40we sleep, but it's the
00:44:41quality of sleep and then
00:44:42the timing of sleep.
00:44:44So any disturbance in that
00:44:46can affect how we do.
00:44:49So we know that kids, even
00:44:50if over a whole week they
00:44:51get enough sleep, if they
00:44:54don't get enough during the
00:44:55week and catch up on the
00:44:56weekend, they still don't do
00:44:57as well.
00:44:59And so sleep and our
00:45:02circadian rhythms, they
00:45:03really regulate every
00:45:05aspect of our body, our
00:45:07metabolism, they affect how
00:45:09we think about things, they
00:45:10affect our choices of
00:45:11food.
00:45:11You're more likely to grab a
00:45:13celery stick when you're,
00:45:14you know, got enough sleep
00:45:16but grab that bagel or that,
00:45:17you know, candy bar when
00:45:19you're sleep deprived.
00:45:21Athletic performance we know
00:45:23is better when people do
00:45:24sleep, academic success in
00:45:26school.
00:45:27And then mental health has
00:45:29some of the most deep
00:45:30connections to sleep health.
00:45:33And that's why even though
00:45:35people, you know, feel better
00:45:37when they see light, it's that
00:45:38timing of light and our
00:45:39circadian rhythms that is so
00:45:41deeply intertwined that if we
00:45:44can improve sleep, if we can
00:45:46improve those rhythms, we see
00:45:47those lower rates of depression
00:45:49overall.
00:45:50We see lower rates of
00:45:51suicide.
00:45:52And that's what the data,
00:45:54there was just a new say that
00:45:54came out just last week,
00:45:56showing 6% higher rates of
00:46:00depression when the sun rises
00:46:02are set later, when we lose
00:46:04that critical morning light.
00:46:06And this gets exponentially
00:46:07worse in the winter when you
00:46:10lose the, you know, the light
00:46:11in the morning.
00:46:12So Texas and the southern
00:46:15states actually lose that
00:46:16morning light for a longer
00:46:17period because of the curve of
00:46:19the earth, the more even days.
00:46:21You get three to four months
00:46:22with it being dark after 8 a.m.
00:46:24And some of the darkest places
00:46:27in the country are actually in
00:46:28western Texas if we were to go
00:46:30to permanent daylight savings
00:46:31time.
00:46:32And that's why in 1974, a lot
00:46:34of the push to end our
00:46:36experiment with daylight savings
00:46:37time was actually pushed by
00:46:38states like Florida and Texas
00:46:40and the southern states.
00:46:44Can you also explain why
00:46:46consistent sleep patterns are
00:46:48important for teen brain
00:46:50development and mental health?
00:46:52Yeah.
00:46:53So again, this goes back to our
00:46:55circadian rhythms.
00:46:57And so better.
00:46:59So when our circadian rhythms
00:47:01are working well, they help us
00:47:02anticipate our day.
00:47:04And so what I mean by that is
00:47:06we have certain times when our
00:47:07body wants to go to sleep.
00:47:09And so teenagers, their natural
00:47:10rhythm is later.
00:47:11If any of you have been around
00:47:12a teenager, you can't just say,
00:47:14go to bed.
00:47:15You know, they're like, I'm
00:47:16wide awake.
00:47:17We have this, what we call a
00:47:18forbidden zone.
00:47:19Their alertness just is
00:47:20skyrocketing in that time before
00:47:22bed.
00:47:23And so they can't get to sleep on
00:47:26time.
00:47:27But if our social schedule is set
00:47:28an hour earlier, which is what
00:47:30daylight savings time does, they
00:47:32don't have that opportunity to get
00:47:34the amount of sleep they need.
00:47:36And they tend to switch back and
00:47:38forth on weekends.
00:47:39And that switching affects us.
00:47:41And so that then affects how our
00:47:44brain functions.
00:47:45We know more and more about sleep
00:47:47being important for clearing toxins
00:47:49from our brain, which sets us up for
00:47:51things like dementia, Parkinson's
00:47:54disease.
00:47:54I just came back from the
00:47:55neuroconference with data being
00:47:57pointing to, you know, the
00:47:59connections there.
00:48:01Our metabolism gets off, so we're
00:48:03more likely to gain weight.
00:48:06Again, even if people do exercise
00:48:08more, we see like 10% higher rates
00:48:11of obesity in places where the sun
00:48:13sets later.
00:48:15So sleep is so critically important
00:48:17for our metabolic health, our
00:48:19overall health, our mental health, how
00:48:21our brain functions, which affects the
00:48:23safety issues.
00:48:25You know, the highway study, it found
00:48:27a higher risk of vehicle clashes, even
00:48:30though it was light later.
00:48:31The effect of sleep is more powerful
00:48:34than almost anything else.
00:48:35And by aligning the sun, we can
00:48:36really help that.
00:48:38So let's talk a little bit about the
00:48:41idea of states' rights.
00:48:43And I've heard from groups on both
00:48:46sides of this issue that want either
00:48:48permanent standard time or permanent
00:48:50daylight savings time.
00:48:52Almost everyone agrees that changing
00:48:54the clock twice a year doesn't make
00:48:55sense.
00:48:56Mr. Yates, in your opening statement,
00:48:58you said that setting the clock is
00:49:00fundamentally a states' rights issue.
00:49:03Why do you think that decision should
00:49:06be left to the states?
00:49:10Thank you for the question, Senator.
00:49:12The main reason is geography, right?
00:49:14Like we live on this big round ball
00:49:17and the sun is moving and the
00:49:20difference in where each state is
00:49:22makes a big difference in how the
00:49:25sunrise and sunset time applies.
00:49:27And so to say that there is one solution
00:49:30that is exactly right for, you know,
00:49:33Texas and the exact same solution is
00:49:35right for Atlanta, for Georgia, is
00:49:40what I would posit overreach by the
00:49:44federal government.
00:49:44And I might even go back to the example
00:49:48that is often cited about when the time
00:49:50change happened in the 70s.
00:49:53And just to give a little context to why
00:49:55that was so, why that was such a failure,
00:49:57it's often cited that people didn't like it
00:50:00because there were children that were put
00:50:02at risk in the dark waiting for school.
00:50:06It turns out a lot of that is apocryphal.
00:50:08As we've heard, pedestrians are much safer
00:50:12with more light later in the day.
00:50:14But the thing that is interesting about
00:50:15that time change was, and this shows you
00:50:17how different politics was back in those days,
00:50:20that law was signed into law on December 15th, 1973,
00:50:26right in the middle of Watergate.
00:50:28You could say that maybe it was a distraction
00:50:29from other things that were going on,
00:50:31but it was enacted on December 15th on a Saturday.
00:50:33It was enacted, it took place on January 6th, 1974,
00:50:40about three weeks later.
00:50:42So you can imagine the worst Monday of the year already
00:50:45is the one after the holiday break
00:50:47where you have to go back to school and everything.
00:50:49To have an extra hour of sleep robbed away
00:50:51right before that, you can understand
00:50:54why it was so unpopular and why it was repealed
00:50:56two months after Nixon resigned office.
00:50:58So it clearly doesn't work for the federal government
00:51:02to come and say, this is a mandate of exactly
00:51:05what we should do for all of the country
00:51:07all at the same time.
00:51:08But it is the place of the Commerce Committee
00:51:11to say, we need a well-regulated time system.
00:51:15And so it makes sense to get rid of the clock changing.
00:51:18And if we give two years to the states
00:51:20to be able to say, so that all of these arguments
00:51:22can be hashed out, and they're all valid arguments,
00:51:25but they can be hashed out in the geography
00:51:26of the place where it would actually apply.
00:51:29And they would have time to plan and figure out
00:51:31what is the appropriate time for school to start
00:51:33to take in this evidence from neurologists?
00:51:35And what is the best time for all of the businesses
00:51:38to operate?
00:51:39So maybe if we had more daylight,
00:51:41the Watergate break-in doesn't happen.
00:51:44And history would be different.
00:51:46Dr. Johnson, you seem to disagree
00:51:48with having states decide on how they should lock the clock.
00:51:51In your judgment, why do you think
00:51:52that would be the wrong approach?
00:51:54So time is a measure.
00:51:56So Congress has the control over setting measures.
00:52:01I think of my husband.
00:52:02He likes to make a joke.
00:52:03He's 6'6 in the morning and 6'5 in the afternoon.
00:52:06We don't change the length of a foot
00:52:08on his diurnal pattern of his height.
00:52:12Time is supposed to say, you know,
00:52:15how the sun is moving through the sky.
00:52:17And so if we set it to a standard time
00:52:21of the sun being closer to overhead at noon,
00:52:24now that's something we can go by.
00:52:28But states then can decide
00:52:30how they want to set their social schedules.
00:52:33So instead of sort of tricking people into,
00:52:37you know, you all have to get up early no matter what,
00:52:40let's have each state decide
00:52:41when they want their schools to start,
00:52:43when businesses want to start.
00:52:45But let's fix a measure of time
00:52:47that is actually has a meaning
00:52:50where the sun is overhead
00:52:51and then adjust, you know,
00:52:54the social schedule around it.
00:52:55And that is definitely something
00:52:57the state should decide on.
00:52:59Senator Lujan.
00:53:01Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:53:02Thank you all for being here today.
00:53:04Dr. Johnson, thank you for joining us today.
00:53:07I saw that the American Academy of Neurology
00:53:10sent the committee a letter
00:53:12encouraging us to consider
00:53:14that standard time, not daylight savings time
00:53:17is the best to align with our body's natural clocks.
00:53:21Many people still sleep through the morning light
00:53:24or after the early sun rises.
00:53:27Does that mean that light is being wasted
00:53:29if they are not using it awake?
00:53:33So light helps us get up.
00:53:37You know, most people will wake up naturally after light.
00:53:40Now, some people, my teenagers,
00:53:43could easily sleep until noon.
00:53:45And that makes them actually more likely
00:53:48shift their schedules even later.
00:53:50So when you miss morning light,
00:53:52which is needed to reset your rhythm,
00:53:54or if you get too much light in the evenings,
00:53:56you drift later
00:53:57and have even more trouble getting up in the morning.
00:54:01And so that's why if we actually set it
00:54:03so the sun is rising earlier in the morning,
00:54:07more people will actually naturally,
00:54:09because their circadian rhythms start saying
00:54:11get up on time rather than get up so late,
00:54:14will be able to be ready for the day,
00:54:16be able to have their circadian rhythms
00:54:19help their health, help their metabolism,
00:54:22which is going to be good for heart disease,
00:54:25stroke risk, dementia risk,
00:54:27all these other sort of chronic health problems.
00:54:30I appreciate that.
00:54:31To all the panelists,
00:54:32what does this mean for New Mexico?
00:54:35For our farmers, school children, and teenagers,
00:54:37the elderly, workers, and tourism, and recreation,
00:54:41what would permanent daylight standard time
00:54:44of permanent standard time mean for these communities?
00:54:51One or the other, I apologize, not of war.
00:54:54Mr. Yates?
00:54:57Senator, thank you for the question.
00:54:58New Mexico is another real leader
00:55:00in early movements to try to lock the clock.
00:55:05Senator Cliff Pirtle,
00:55:06State Senator Cliff Pirtle worked on this.
00:55:08I worked with him closely for a long time.
00:55:11It was, the effects on everybody in New Mexico
00:55:16of the clock changing is the same,
00:55:17which is, it's very disruptive.
00:55:19It's not disruptive equally for everybody,
00:55:21but for a lot of people it is.
00:55:23A lot of, you know,
00:55:25all the things that we've cited,
00:55:26all the different health studies show that.
00:55:29The thing that I've been advocating today
00:55:32about the two-year implementation period
00:55:34would be especially helpful for New Mexico
00:55:35because you have a tricky little trade region
00:55:38where you abut West Texas,
00:55:42which is in the mountain time zone,
00:55:43and part of Mexico.
00:55:45And so there's a region
00:55:47where interstate commerce is directly affected.
00:55:50And so all of Mexico recently decided
00:55:52to lock the clock,
00:55:53except for the part that is attached
00:55:55to West Texas and New Mexico.
00:55:57And so these issues of commerce are complicated
00:55:59and do take a little while to work out.
00:56:01So that's the one thing I would say
00:56:03is that that sort of thing
00:56:04should be addressed carefully.
00:56:05Mr. Kern?
00:56:06I would say that the golf courses in New Mexico,
00:56:10which enjoy mostly afternoon and evening light,
00:56:13all the great hiking that goes on in New Mexico,
00:56:15the rock climbing,
00:56:16the hot air ballooning,
00:56:17all of that would be seriously curbed
00:56:21if daylight saving time was removed.
00:56:25And that would be, I think,
00:56:27a detriment to the New Mexico economy
00:56:29and people's time and ability
00:56:31to get outside and enjoy what you have.
00:56:34You're suggesting that people hike
00:56:36and golf in the morning?
00:56:38No, they do all that in the afternoon.
00:56:40And if standard time was made permanent,
00:56:42they would feel forced to do it in the morning,
00:56:45but they have to go to school.
00:56:46They have to go to work.
00:56:47And I don't think they would be able
00:56:48to make that shift.
00:56:50Appreciate that.
00:56:52Dr. Johnson?
00:56:54Yeah, I would say, if anything,
00:56:56you know, you have a neighboring state, Arizona,
00:56:58that does very well on standard time
00:57:00and has shown that the golf industry can thrive.
00:57:02If anything, a lot of people say,
00:57:04and one of the reasons Arizona says
00:57:06they stayed on standard time
00:57:07is because it gets too hot later.
00:57:09So a lot of people do like to do exercise later,
00:57:12and that often is actually a better time
00:57:14for our health to get our exercise in.
00:57:16So if we can get people up
00:57:18so that they can be more active in the morning
00:57:20and get this exercise
00:57:22and enjoy all the wonderful things like hiking,
00:57:25which I know when I've gone to places like New Mexico,
00:57:27I do in the morning.
00:57:29You know, I think that we can still have
00:57:31all these activities on either time,
00:57:33but I think standard time is the healthier choice.
00:57:36Dr. Harkin?
00:57:36So our work was looking at fatality data nationally
00:57:42rather than by individual states,
00:57:45in part due to sample size.
00:57:47But if the patterns hold in New Mexico,
00:57:49just like they have in our research across the country,
00:57:52then we're going to see an offset
00:57:55between the number of motor vehicle occupant deaths
00:57:58that have risen slightly during the time change periods
00:58:02and pedestrian and bicyclist deaths
00:58:04that have decreased slightly during that same time period.
00:58:09And so the net effect is one of really no change
00:58:13when we look at road safety data alone.
00:58:16And so if you're trying to make this decision
00:58:17on the basis of just road safety,
00:58:20I don't think the results of our study
00:58:22are going to point you in one direction or the other.
00:58:25As a follow-up to that, Dr. Harkin,
00:58:28Dr. Johnson pointed to a study from a professor
00:58:30at Eastern New Mexico University, Jeff Gentry,
00:58:34who showed 20% higher car crashes
00:58:37in locations where sunrises and sunsets are later.
00:58:40Now, I understand your point that darkness
00:58:42is a key measure of accidents,
00:58:44but this data shows me that sleep effects
00:58:47are powerful indicators as well.
00:58:50How do you view the risk of sleep deprivation
00:58:51on accidents versus risks from darkness?
00:58:54So our study did not look specifically
00:58:57at that particular issue.
00:58:58I know other studies have.
00:59:00Methodologies differ.
00:59:02Most of the studies that have tried to look strictly
00:59:04at that small amount of time change
00:59:06before and after in the crashes
00:59:07concur that the real issue here
00:59:10is the amount of ambient light
00:59:11and the time of day when it occurs,
00:59:13that darkness is the real key,
00:59:15and you just need to make sure
00:59:16that you're providing good safety interventions
00:59:19to address issues of darkness.
00:59:21So whether that is improving technologies
00:59:23in the vehicle, such as headlights,
00:59:25automatic emergency braking,
00:59:27or whether it's you're putting in infrastructure measures
00:59:29that add more lighting,
00:59:31add more space for pedestrians and bicyclists
00:59:34to keep them separated from motors,
00:59:35whatever you can do
00:59:36to reduce those conflicts in the darkness
00:59:40and improve awareness of other road users
00:59:43in the darkness will be beneficial,
00:59:45regardless of the time change.
00:59:47It sounds like you support my legislation
00:59:49to require technology to be installed
00:59:51in vehicles to prevent impaired crashes.
00:59:53So I'll take that as well.
00:59:54We'll share that with my colleagues.
00:59:56Mr. Chairman, I have one more question
00:59:57for Mr. Yates on standard time versus daylight savings.
01:00:00I'll just admit it into the record.
01:00:02And just to note to the panelists,
01:00:03the reason I'm asking so much about sleep
01:00:04is, as my colleagues know,
01:00:07I suffered a stroke three years ago.
01:00:09I've learned a lot about the importance of sleep.
01:00:11I definitely lived my life burning the candle at both ends.
01:00:16And now I do my due diligence
01:00:18to embrace sleep hygiene and all the rest.
01:00:21And so that's bearing a lot into this conversation
01:00:24that I'm having with my constituents
01:00:25and others, Mr. Chairman.
01:00:26So I very much appreciate this hearing though.
01:00:28Thank you all for being here.
01:00:30Senator Young.
01:00:33Well, I thank all of you for being here.
01:00:35I'm the senior senator from the state of Indiana.
01:00:38And we have quite a history
01:00:39with daylight savings time.
01:00:42For those of you who have consumed
01:00:44old Parks and Rec episodes,
01:00:46you may have seen the one that focused
01:00:48on this particular topic.
01:00:50But let me walk through some of the things
01:00:55that have transpired in our state.
01:00:57And I'll weave in there
01:01:00some of the unique perspectives
01:01:02that Hoosiers have brought to this.
01:01:05Until 2006, our state was chronologically
01:01:09divided, you might say,
01:01:11with some counties observing daylight savings time
01:01:14and others not.
01:01:16And then in 2006, after years of debate,
01:01:19furious debate,
01:01:21our state decided to become the 48th state
01:01:24to adopt daylight savings time.
01:01:26In central Indiana,
01:01:27on the shortest day of the year,
01:01:29December 21st,
01:01:30the sun currently rises at 8.02 a.m.
01:01:34and sets at 5.23 p.m.
01:01:37Under permanent daylight savings time,
01:01:39sunrise would be delayed until 9.02 a.m.,
01:01:42meaning Hoosiers would begin their day
01:01:45in darkness for much of the winter.
01:01:47What works for East Coast states,
01:01:50I'm hearing from many of my constituents,
01:01:52might not work for states like Indiana.
01:01:55We have 12 counties
01:01:56in the western part of the state
01:01:58that are in the central time zone.
01:02:01So Evansville, Indiana,
01:02:03if you're familiar with that,
01:02:04you got up near Chicago,
01:02:05what we call the region affectionately.
01:02:09And so there are 80 other counties
01:02:13that are in the eastern time zone.
01:02:16So, you know,
01:02:17this sort of suggests
01:02:18that maybe a one-size-fits-all
01:02:20national policy on time changes
01:02:22doesn't take into account
01:02:24the regional differences
01:02:26that significantly impact daily life.
01:02:30I understand we have a charge,
01:02:33Article I, Section 8,
01:02:34to facilitate interstate commerce.
01:02:36It was one of the major arguments
01:02:39of facilitating interstate commerce
01:02:41from the state level
01:02:42when we had this debate.
01:02:44So I anticipate we've heard that.
01:02:46I anticipate I'll hear more of that
01:02:49from my colleagues.
01:02:49But that has to be balanced
01:02:50against other considerations, of course.
01:02:53Leaving this decision to the states
01:02:57might allow local leaders
01:02:59who best understand their communities
01:03:01to weigh the specific needs
01:03:04of their residents.
01:03:06States, along this line of argument,
01:03:08are in a better position
01:03:09to evaluate how changes
01:03:11in daylight hours
01:03:12affect school schedules,
01:03:14commuting patterns,
01:03:15public safety,
01:03:16and economic activity.
01:03:19So I guess to the panel,
01:03:21do you believe that states
01:03:23like Indiana,
01:03:24with their unique cultures
01:03:26and geographical challenges
01:03:28and even histories
01:03:29as it relates to this issue,
01:03:32should have the flexibility
01:03:33to make their own decision
01:03:35or do you think this decision
01:03:36should be standardized
01:03:37across the country?
01:03:39We'll begin with Mr. Yates
01:03:40and I'll give everyone
01:03:41an opportunity to speak to that
01:03:43if you like.
01:03:44Yes, sir.
01:03:45Thank you, Senator Young,
01:03:47for the question.
01:03:47And I mentioned Indiana
01:03:48in my opening statement
01:03:50because it's a perfect example
01:03:51of why the Commerce Committee
01:03:52needs to approach this carefully
01:03:54because to impose onto Indiana
01:03:57a solution that is the same
01:03:59as for New York
01:04:00and for New England
01:04:01is not the best interest
01:04:04of the people of Indiana
01:04:05and is a little bit rude.
01:04:07The one thing that I might say, though,
01:04:10is that I have,
01:04:11I've never been to Indiana to testify,
01:04:13but I did go to Michigan
01:04:14to testify about their
01:04:15daylight saving time bill.
01:04:16And I went to Nebraska
01:04:18and to Kansas,
01:04:19which are states like Indiana
01:04:21on the western edge
01:04:22of their time zones
01:04:23and would make the most sense
01:04:24for them to be in standard time.
01:04:26And I advocated for that
01:04:27with the state senators
01:04:28and state representatives
01:04:30in those states.
01:04:31And all of them told me
01:04:32that all of their constituents
01:04:33don't care.
01:04:35They would rather,
01:04:36like in the middle of the winter,
01:04:37they're already going to school
01:04:39and going to work in the dark.
01:04:41And they would just like
01:04:42to have a little bit of time
01:04:43after school
01:04:45and after work
01:04:46to be in the light.
01:04:47So I said,
01:04:47okay, this is your state.
01:04:49You get to pick.
01:04:51Thank you for your response.
01:04:53Mr. Karen.
01:04:54Well, I'm no constitutional scholar
01:04:56for sure,
01:04:56but I don't see
01:04:58in the Constitution
01:04:59where it says
01:04:59that the federal government
01:05:01regulates time.
01:05:03I don't know
01:05:03if time falls under commerce,
01:05:04so it would naturally
01:05:05fall to the states
01:05:06if the federal government
01:05:07is not in power to do so.
01:05:08We have the view
01:05:08that everything
01:05:09falls under commerce.
01:05:11I appreciate that.
01:05:12I will say,
01:05:13you know,
01:05:13I feel it's less
01:05:16of a state issue
01:05:18than it feels like
01:05:19a personal issue.
01:05:20And the ability
01:05:21to do,
01:05:23for example,
01:05:24to Senator One's comments,
01:05:27I can simulate
01:05:28or practice sleep hygiene
01:05:30whether the sun
01:05:31is up or down,
01:05:32but I can't simulate
01:05:34sun hygiene.
01:05:35I can't light the world
01:05:37when we want to be out there
01:05:38when it's dark, right?
01:05:40And so I think,
01:05:41to me,
01:05:41it comes down to
01:05:42which choice,
01:05:44if you were to land on one,
01:05:45is going to be harder
01:05:46to adjust to.
01:05:47We are already
01:05:47on daylight saving time
01:05:48for eight months,
01:05:49so we'd have to adjust
01:05:50for four months.
01:05:51If you reverse it,
01:05:52then we're adjusting
01:05:53eight months
01:05:54of our calendar.
01:05:55Thank you, sir.
01:05:57Dr. Johnson,
01:05:58would you like
01:05:58to say something?
01:05:59Yeah, I want to talk
01:06:00about the western edge
01:06:01of time zones.
01:06:03States like yours
01:06:04are more aligned
01:06:06with central time zones,
01:06:08so already on standard time,
01:06:09your sun is going
01:06:10to be overhead
01:06:11closer to one.
01:06:12When we go
01:06:12to daylight savings time,
01:06:13now it's closer
01:06:14to two.
01:06:15And we see
01:06:16that this really impacts
01:06:19health risks,
01:06:21mental health risks,
01:06:22safety risks,
01:06:23how kids do in school.
01:06:25I want to highlight
01:06:26one Indiana study,
01:06:28when you guys ended
01:06:29going the parts
01:06:31of the state
01:06:31that were on standard time.
01:06:33Wait, you're citing a study?
01:06:36Are we allowed
01:06:36to do that in this?
01:06:37Is that consistent
01:06:38with the rules,
01:06:39Chairman Cruz?
01:06:39I'm kidding, of course.
01:06:41So when part of Indiana
01:06:43ended standard time
01:06:44and went to seasonal
01:06:46daylight savings time,
01:06:48they found that kids'
01:06:50high school test scores
01:06:52were actually much better
01:06:55when they were
01:06:56on standard time
01:06:57and dropped
01:06:57when they switched
01:06:59to even seasonal
01:07:00daylight savings time.
01:07:01And that's not adding
01:07:02the exponential harms
01:07:04of bringing
01:07:05those 9 a.m. sunrises
01:07:06like you said.
01:07:08So we would love
01:07:09every place
01:07:10to be more in line
01:07:11with the sun.
01:07:12And as you said,
01:07:13states have different
01:07:14needs to get closer
01:07:17to that ideal.
01:07:19Thank you, Dr.
01:07:20Dr. Harkey.
01:07:22So we didn't have
01:07:23a preference
01:07:24in our study
01:07:25for one time
01:07:27or the other
01:07:28in terms of
01:07:29how you set it.
01:07:29what our study showed
01:07:31was that the risk
01:07:33of fatalities
01:07:35for pedestrians
01:07:35and bicyclists
01:07:36in particular
01:07:37rises at night.
01:07:39And it rises
01:07:40for all motorists
01:07:41as well at night.
01:07:43So the real key
01:07:44is regardless
01:07:45of which decision
01:07:46you make
01:07:46and which time zone
01:07:47you use,
01:07:48you've got to make sure
01:07:49that you're putting
01:07:50interventions in
01:07:51that is going to help
01:07:52with those who are
01:07:53traveling in those dark hours,
01:07:55whether it is more
01:07:56in the morning
01:07:57or more in the afternoon
01:07:58and evening,
01:07:59that's the real key
01:08:01and particularly
01:08:01for pedestrians
01:08:02and bicyclists
01:08:03who are the overwhelming
01:08:05number of fatalities
01:08:07that are occurring
01:08:07in those dark hours.
01:08:10I see.
01:08:12I'm very much over time.
01:08:14I see that Mr. Caron
01:08:15has something
01:08:16he wants to say.
01:08:17So I've been given
01:08:19lead by the chairman.
01:08:21Please, go ahead.
01:08:22I just want to point out
01:08:23that Senator Scott's bill,
01:08:24the Sunshine Protection Act,
01:08:25kind of threads the needle.
01:08:28It creates a federal
01:08:29daylight saving time
01:08:31but allows every state
01:08:32to opt out
01:08:33if they chose.
01:08:33So I think that's
01:08:34maybe the best answer here.
01:08:37Good point.
01:08:38All right.
01:08:39Chairman.
01:08:41Senator Marking.
01:08:42Yep.
01:08:42Thank you, Mr. Chairman,
01:08:42very much.
01:08:44So it's 1985.
01:08:47It's my fifth term
01:08:49in the United States
01:08:49House of Representatives.
01:08:50And I become the chairman
01:08:52of the Energy Subcommittee
01:08:53on the Energy
01:08:55and Commerce Committee.
01:08:57And searching through
01:09:00the jurisdiction
01:09:01of this wonderful subcommittee
01:09:02is time.
01:09:04I guess somebody's
01:09:05going to have to be
01:09:06chairman all the time.
01:09:07And it's me.
01:09:08I'm chairman of time.
01:09:10And nothing had been
01:09:12driving me crazier
01:09:14than the birds chirping.
01:09:17You know,
01:09:17at 5 a.m.
01:09:20in the morning.
01:09:21It's sunshine now.
01:09:23It's the end of April.
01:09:25This is not good.
01:09:27So I began a negotiation
01:09:29with Bill Goodling,
01:09:31who was a Republican
01:09:32from Pennsylvania,
01:09:34to move time.
01:09:36And it was a hard,
01:09:38grudging discussion.
01:09:39But I was able to move it
01:09:41from the end of April
01:09:42to the beginning of April
01:09:43in 1986.
01:09:45And so that changed it
01:09:47because at that point
01:09:48it was six months
01:09:48daylight,
01:09:49six months standard.
01:09:51So I was able to
01:09:52claw back
01:09:54three weeks
01:09:55pretty much to
01:09:56right now.
01:09:58And otherwise
01:09:59we'd still be
01:10:00another two or three weeks
01:10:01where
01:10:01there's no
01:10:03daylight savings time.
01:10:04Then
01:10:05Congressman Goodling
01:10:08left.
01:10:09And so in 2005
01:10:10I'm still on
01:10:11the Energy Subcommittee.
01:10:13So with Fred Upton,
01:10:15who was a Republican
01:10:16from Michigan,
01:10:18we cut another deal
01:10:19and we moved it
01:10:20to the beginning of March.
01:10:22And we also said
01:10:23let's put Halloween
01:10:24in daylight savings time.
01:10:27And so we moved it
01:10:28into the beginning
01:10:29of November.
01:10:30So at that point
01:10:31I'm at eight daylight
01:10:33four standard.
01:10:35So I'm kind of proud
01:10:36of my two bills
01:10:37changing time.
01:10:39They started to call me
01:10:40the Sun King
01:10:40which I was
01:10:42kind of proud of.
01:10:44Those are big bills
01:10:45Mr. Chairman.
01:10:46That's moving time.
01:10:48And the whole world
01:10:49then starts to move
01:10:50to that
01:10:51standard.
01:10:55So
01:10:55we had to stop there.
01:10:58And then two years ago
01:10:59Senator Rubio and I
01:11:00we had a bill
01:11:02to do daylight savings time
01:11:04year round
01:11:04and
01:11:05and it passed
01:11:06by unanimous consent
01:11:08out on the floor
01:11:09of the Senate.
01:11:10It was then stalled
01:11:11in the House.
01:11:13Never had a vote over there.
01:11:15But
01:11:16I consider this
01:11:17kind of an inexorable
01:11:18march
01:11:20towards more sunshine
01:11:22that people can enjoy
01:11:23not while they're asleep.
01:11:25You know
01:11:25having the sun come in
01:11:27early in the morning.
01:11:29So
01:11:30so that's my goal.
01:11:32My goal is just to make sure
01:11:33people get more sunshine
01:11:34in
01:11:35in the evening
01:11:36when they can use it
01:11:37especially
01:11:37as I heard your opening statement
01:11:39Mr. Chairman
01:11:39as our economy has changed
01:11:41and
01:11:42not an agricultural
01:11:44predominant
01:11:47economy
01:11:47any longer
01:11:48although farmers play
01:11:49a vital role
01:11:49in our society
01:11:50but we're more
01:11:51into
01:11:53the economy
01:11:54that we all
01:11:55live in today.
01:11:56so I guess
01:11:57my first question
01:11:58Mr. Karen
01:11:58is how
01:11:59how would
01:12:00extending
01:12:00evening daylight
01:12:03support
01:12:04small businesses
01:12:05in your industry?
01:12:08It would add
01:12:09to the golf industry
01:12:10at least
01:12:12one billion dollars
01:12:13of economic activity.
01:12:14The average golf course
01:12:15would see an increase
01:12:17in approximately
01:12:18two hundred fifty thousand dollars
01:12:19in revenue.
01:12:20And I mean
01:12:20that's an economic argument
01:12:21but the golfers
01:12:22around America
01:12:23the thirty million golfers
01:12:24would get to enjoy
01:12:25all of that.
01:12:26So that's the argument.
01:12:27Right.
01:12:28But it's also true
01:12:29that
01:12:29let's just go back
01:12:30to 1986
01:12:31it's hard to start
01:12:33your Little League practices
01:12:34if it's still dark
01:12:35in the evening
01:12:35at the end of April.
01:12:37Kids are still
01:12:38you know
01:12:38not going to be allowed
01:12:40out into the dark
01:12:41or are you playing tennis
01:12:42or walking around?
01:12:43So that change
01:12:44was very important
01:12:45was it not?
01:12:46Yes.
01:12:46In 86
01:12:46and then again in 2001.
01:12:48My brother happens
01:12:49to be an athletic director
01:12:50at a high school
01:12:51and he said
01:12:51you know
01:12:52we don't like
01:12:53having to spend money
01:12:53on lights
01:12:54for every single activity
01:12:55that happens after school.
01:12:56Yeah.
01:12:56So would an additional
01:12:58hour of evening sunlight
01:13:01help businesses
01:13:02save money
01:13:02on energy costs
01:13:03from not having
01:13:04to turn the lights
01:13:04on early
01:13:05much less athletic?
01:13:06Well golf
01:13:06we don't light
01:13:07the golf courses
01:13:08so it wouldn't be
01:13:09an energy savings
01:13:09for us
01:13:10it's mostly about
01:13:11health and economic.
01:13:12Health and economic
01:13:13yeah.
01:13:14And Mr. Yates
01:13:16what does your research
01:13:18say about the benefits
01:13:19of ending the switch
01:13:20twice a year
01:13:21between daylight
01:13:22savings time
01:13:22and standard time?
01:13:24Thank you Senator
01:13:25for the question
01:13:25and I appreciate
01:13:26the nickname
01:13:27that you got
01:13:28it's better
01:13:28than the nickname
01:13:29that the comedy
01:13:30central the daily show
01:13:31called me
01:13:32the time wizard
01:13:33and so I was
01:13:34I wasn't sure
01:13:36if I should be offended
01:13:36or I'm going to keep
01:13:37sun king for myself
01:13:38okay
01:13:38yeah sun king
01:13:39is way better
01:13:39than time wizard
01:13:40I like that
01:13:41yeah
01:13:41the detrimental effects
01:13:45of switching the clocks
01:13:47are super clear
01:13:48and it seems like
01:13:51we've got pretty much
01:13:52unanimous agreement
01:13:53about that at this point
01:13:54and what's delightful
01:13:56about it
01:13:56from my perspective
01:13:57is to hear you
01:13:58tell these stories
01:13:58because you clearly
01:13:59have been a pioneer
01:14:00on this for a long time
01:14:01and what's great
01:14:03is that this has never
01:14:04been at all
01:14:05a partisan issue
01:14:05it's always been
01:14:07a completely bipartisan issue
01:14:08when you look
01:14:09at the 24 states
01:14:10that have enacted
01:14:11something to
01:14:11can I say this as well
01:14:12an opposition
01:14:13has always been bipartisan
01:14:14because I had to negotiate
01:14:16with Representative Goodling
01:14:17in
01:14:18who's a Republican
01:14:20you know
01:14:21on the other side
01:14:22but I had Republicans
01:14:23Carlos Moorhead
01:14:24from Orange County
01:14:25was on my side
01:14:25a Republican
01:14:26and I had to negotiate
01:14:28with Larry Craig
01:14:29who was Senator
01:14:30from Idaho
01:14:31he was the Senator
01:14:32before
01:14:33Jim Risch
01:14:34so I had to negotiate
01:14:35with him on this
01:14:36he was in opposition
01:14:37but I had Fred Upton
01:14:38from Michigan
01:14:39who was a supporter
01:14:40so it's always been
01:14:41bipartisan on either side
01:14:43you know
01:14:43these coalitions
01:14:44that are there
01:14:45and so that's
01:14:48the only way
01:14:48from my perspective
01:14:49that you know
01:14:50we're going to be able
01:14:50to work here
01:14:52as well
01:14:53in order to
01:14:53make some progress
01:14:54and you know
01:14:57it's
01:14:58we just have to make
01:15:01daylight savings
01:15:02time permanent
01:15:02in my opinion
01:15:03one way or the other
01:15:04or at least get more
01:15:05we need more sunshine
01:15:07you know
01:15:07and the reason
01:15:08Mr. Chairman
01:15:09it's from my perspective
01:15:11it just
01:15:12when the sun's out
01:15:13it just
01:15:14increases the likelihood
01:15:16that the corners
01:15:16of people's mouths
01:15:17are going to be
01:15:17turned upwards
01:15:18they're going to be
01:15:19happier when the sun's out
01:15:20they're going to be
01:15:20feeling good
01:15:21that's why so many people
01:15:22move to Texas
01:15:23by the way
01:15:23Florida
01:15:24it's not the politics
01:15:27it's the sun
01:15:27they're chasing
01:15:28right
01:15:28so this is
01:15:30from my perspective
01:15:31a universal feeling
01:15:33right
01:15:34that when that sun's out
01:15:35and they can go out
01:15:36and enjoy it
01:15:37in the evening
01:15:38it just makes
01:15:39all the difference
01:15:39in the world to them
01:15:41and so we have to
01:15:42find a way here
01:15:43of resolving
01:15:45these issues
01:15:46to be able to
01:15:48to be able to
01:15:49deal with it
01:15:50and I know
01:15:51there's disagreements
01:15:52on it
01:15:53including
01:15:53I know Karen Johnson
01:15:55is here from Massachusetts
01:15:56and she's on the other
01:15:57side of the issue
01:15:58which I respect
01:15:59so it's just
01:16:00a big conversation
01:16:01that I hope
01:16:02we can resolve
01:16:03because I just think
01:16:05it's for
01:16:06the benefit
01:16:08of people's happiness
01:16:12just to have
01:16:13that sunshine
01:16:13available
01:16:14they can do a lot more
01:16:15in the sunshine
01:16:15in the evening
01:16:16than they can do
01:16:17early in the morning
01:16:18and I thank you
01:16:19Mr. Chairman
01:16:19for the opportunity
01:16:20to be here
01:16:21thank you
01:16:24your majesty
01:16:24and I will say
01:16:28I did not know
01:16:29that my friend
01:16:30from Massachusetts
01:16:31had acquired
01:16:32the nickname
01:16:32the Sun King
01:16:33which the previous
01:16:35Sun King
01:16:35of course
01:16:36was King Louis XIV
01:16:38in France
01:16:39whose best known
01:16:41statement
01:16:41was
01:16:42l'état c'est moi
01:16:43I am the state
01:16:44which may explain
01:16:45the differences
01:16:46between Senator Markey
01:16:48and myself
01:16:48on the size
01:16:49of government
01:16:49well
01:16:51I think
01:16:52I think
01:16:53President Trump
01:16:54is quoting
01:16:55King Louis
01:16:56very favorably
01:16:57that's a fair point
01:17:01since he did
01:17:01in fact tweet out
01:17:02Louis
01:17:02l'état c'est moi
01:17:04I think
01:17:05I saw
01:17:06I didn't know
01:17:07he knew French
01:17:07but I think
01:17:08he in fact
01:17:09did
01:17:10in fact
01:17:11quote favorably
01:17:12not even
01:17:13as you are
01:17:14you're doing it
01:17:15with a very high
01:17:16risible coefficient
01:17:18you're doing it
01:17:19jokingly
01:17:19I think he was serious
01:17:21although
01:17:22I will say this
01:17:23I think you gave
01:17:24the president
01:17:24good advice
01:17:25two days ago
01:17:25acting
01:17:27we'll call it
01:17:27more like
01:17:28King Louis
01:17:30well I will note
01:17:31as you know
01:17:31I lived three years
01:17:32in Massachusetts
01:17:33and I remember
01:17:34my third year
01:17:35of law school
01:17:35where it snowed
01:17:37in the month of May
01:17:38which I thought
01:17:39was positively
01:17:40immoral
01:17:40and as you noted
01:17:42the sun is a very
01:17:44good recruiter
01:17:45for the great state
01:17:45of Texas
01:17:46I am fond of saying
01:17:47you can't shovel sunshine
01:17:48and that is
01:17:49a beautiful thing
01:17:51I'll give you
01:17:51I'll give you
01:17:52some news
01:17:54that the winters
01:17:55in Boston
01:17:55are now six degrees
01:17:56warmer
01:17:57than they were
01:17:58in 1970
01:17:59because of climate
01:18:00change
01:18:00so our ponds
01:18:01don't even
01:18:01freeze over
01:18:04in the winter
01:18:04anymore
01:18:04much less snowing
01:18:05in May
01:18:06so
01:18:06maybe kids
01:18:08from Texas
01:18:09going to law school
01:18:10up in Boston
01:18:10now
01:18:11enjoy May
01:18:12a lot more
01:18:12than they used to
01:18:13all right
01:18:14so I'm going to
01:18:14ask a couple more
01:18:15questions
01:18:15then we're going to
01:18:15wrap up the hearing
01:18:17Mr. Karen
01:18:21give us your best
01:18:25argument
01:18:25why recreational
01:18:26daylight
01:18:27is so important
01:18:28to your members
01:18:29my members
01:18:33deliver joy
01:18:34for a living
01:18:34and they happen
01:18:35to run businesses
01:18:36making that happen
01:18:37so to them
01:18:38if they saw
01:18:40more people
01:18:40in the afternoons
01:18:42and the evenings
01:18:42enjoying
01:18:43the outdoors
01:18:44with each other
01:18:44it's why they get
01:18:47out of bed
01:18:47it's why they do this
01:18:48so they'll have
01:18:50better lives
01:18:50as business owners
01:18:51they'll be able
01:18:52to pay the bills
01:18:53a little bit better
01:18:54and reinvest
01:18:55in their businesses
01:18:56if they had
01:18:57a little bit of a boost
01:18:58more in the afternoons
01:18:59and evenings
01:18:59that was helpful
01:19:02although I will say
01:19:03on the delivering joy
01:19:05I couldn't help
01:19:06but think of
01:19:08I think the best
01:19:09comedy riff ever done
01:19:10which is Robin Williams
01:19:11Oh I've seen that
01:19:12golf
01:19:12which I will note
01:19:14is profane
01:19:15but screamingly funny
01:19:17and he points out
01:19:18that golf was invented
01:19:22by the Scots
01:19:23and how infuriating
01:19:25it can be at time
01:19:26and he said
01:19:27I know we'll call it
01:19:28a stroke
01:19:28because when you miss
01:19:30you want to have a stroke
01:19:31very good
01:19:34all right
01:19:35Dr. Johnson
01:19:36would shifting time zones
01:19:45slightly address
01:19:47the concerns
01:19:47for communities
01:19:48that are in
01:19:49dark zone areas
01:19:50if the clock
01:19:52were permanently set
01:19:53on daylight savings times
01:19:55does shifting
01:19:56the time zones
01:19:57make a difference
01:19:57so we would encourage
01:20:00all states
01:20:01to be within
01:20:02their sort of time zone
01:20:03that is closest
01:20:04to the sun
01:20:05being overhead at noon
01:20:06so for example
01:20:07like Indiana
01:20:08being more
01:20:10in the central time zone
01:20:11versus the eastern time zone
01:20:13would help
01:20:14get them more aligned
01:20:16with the sun
01:20:16but it should be
01:20:17standard time
01:20:18so there has been
01:20:19a push on the east coast
01:20:20to have us
01:20:21in Atlantic
01:20:21standard time
01:20:22that is a time set
01:20:24for Bermuda
01:20:24that is not
01:20:25the time set
01:20:26for any of the east coast
01:20:27so you know
01:20:29we want
01:20:30permanent standard
01:20:31eastern time
01:20:33not permanent
01:20:34standard Atlantic time
01:20:36which is the exact same
01:20:37as permanent
01:20:38daylight savings time
01:20:39Dr. Harkey
01:20:41what has your research
01:20:43found
01:20:44as it relates
01:20:45to traffic accidents
01:20:46immediately following
01:20:48a time change
01:20:49so that's
01:20:50what we were looking at
01:20:52as part of our research
01:20:53was in that
01:20:54five week period
01:20:54before
01:20:55and the five week period
01:20:56after the time change
01:20:58and when we fall back
01:21:00in the fall
01:21:01vehicle occupant deaths
01:21:02go down
01:21:03about 7%
01:21:04and when they spring forward
01:21:08vehicle occupant deaths
01:21:10go up
01:21:10about 12%
01:21:11and the exact opposite
01:21:13with pedestrian
01:21:14and fatalities
01:21:14so when we fall back
01:21:16pedestrian and fatalities
01:21:18rise
01:21:1913%
01:21:20and then when we spring forward
01:21:21they go down
01:21:2224%
01:21:23and so the net effect
01:21:25is almost zero
01:21:27between pedestrian
01:21:29and vehicle
01:21:30pedestrian bicyclists
01:21:32and vehicle deaths
01:21:33and so
01:21:33that's why
01:21:34our research really doesn't
01:21:36come out strongly
01:21:37in favor of either one
01:21:38but what's clear
01:21:41is that darkness matters
01:21:43and that's where
01:21:44we do about a quarter
01:21:45of our travel
01:21:46at night
01:21:47and yet that's when
01:21:4850%
01:21:49of the vehicle
01:21:51occupant deaths
01:21:51occur
01:21:51and when more than
01:21:53three quarters
01:21:53of the pedestrian
01:21:54deaths occur
01:21:55so regardless
01:21:56of what policy decision
01:21:57is made
01:21:58with regards to the time
01:21:59and where we set
01:22:00the clocks
01:22:01we have to make sure
01:22:02we're continuing
01:22:03to improve
01:22:04our infrastructure
01:22:05continuing to improve
01:22:06vehicle technology
01:22:07that will address
01:22:09the safety risk
01:22:10that we have
01:22:11at night
01:22:11in dark conditions
01:22:12so you just said
01:22:14darkness mattered
01:22:15and it occurred to me
01:22:17an alternative title
01:22:18for this hearing
01:22:19instead of if we could
01:22:19turn back time
01:22:20might have been
01:22:22hello darkness
01:22:22my old friend
01:22:23all right
01:22:26look this hearing
01:22:29was important
01:22:29and I wanted to hear
01:22:30all this testimony
01:22:31because I personally
01:22:32struggle with the two
01:22:33two choices here
01:22:34because
01:22:35it's a question of
01:22:37what do you care
01:22:38about more
01:22:39sunshine
01:22:39and joy
01:22:40and fun
01:22:41and money
01:22:41or health
01:22:43mental health
01:22:44physical health
01:22:45and the honest answer
01:22:47for most people
01:22:48is gosh
01:22:48I care about
01:22:49all that stuff
01:22:49so that
01:22:50that's not an easy
01:22:53trade off
01:22:53the alternative
01:22:54that has been suggested
01:22:55is let each state
01:22:57make that decision
01:22:58and I guess
01:23:00it's been pointed out
01:23:01that Senator Scott's bill
01:23:02does a version of that
01:23:04by picking daylight
01:23:05savings times
01:23:06but then letting states
01:23:07opt out
01:23:07let me ask
01:23:09as a practical matter
01:23:10does that work
01:23:13is
01:23:13functionally
01:23:15how confusing
01:23:16is that
01:23:17having everyone
01:23:18pick different times
01:23:20how does that work
01:23:22for commerce
01:23:22for life
01:23:23for knowing
01:23:24what the hell time
01:23:24it is
01:23:25let me have each
01:23:26of you answer that
01:23:28Senator Cruz
01:23:29thank you for that
01:23:30the one little part
01:23:33of Senator Markey's
01:23:34history
01:23:35about
01:23:35when they changed
01:23:37the time
01:23:37in November
01:23:38was that
01:23:39the proposal
01:23:40was to move
01:23:40daylight saving time
01:23:41to finish
01:23:42at the end
01:23:42of November
01:23:43and the airlines
01:23:44came back
01:23:45and said
01:23:45no no no
01:23:45we don't want
01:23:46a time change
01:23:47in the middle
01:23:47of our busiest
01:23:48travel season
01:23:48and so
01:23:49they were going
01:23:50to scrap that
01:23:51and then they
01:23:51got the extra
01:23:52week to put it in
01:23:52so
01:23:53time is
01:23:54is always complicated
01:23:56and the system
01:23:56that we have
01:23:57the system
01:23:58that we
01:23:59excuse me
01:23:59the system
01:24:00that we have
01:24:00is complicated
01:24:02but it's complicated
01:24:03because it is
01:24:05a human creation
01:24:06right
01:24:06the sun moving
01:24:07around the earth
01:24:08doesn't actually
01:24:08have anything
01:24:09to do with time
01:24:10time is
01:24:11is the agreement
01:24:12that we have
01:24:13about what
01:24:1410 o'clock means
01:24:15because we don't
01:24:15want to go around
01:24:16saying
01:24:16you know
01:24:17the committee hearing
01:24:18will start
01:24:18when the sun
01:24:19is two hands
01:24:20above the horizon
01:24:21we need this system
01:24:22but the system
01:24:23has this bug
01:24:24right now
01:24:24and the bug
01:24:25is daylight saving time
01:24:26it's the switching
01:24:27of the clocks
01:24:27and so
01:24:28if we have
01:24:30a little bit of time
01:24:30a couple of years
01:24:32so that the individual
01:24:33states can address
01:24:33all of these complexities
01:24:34and make those decisions
01:24:36then we will be able
01:24:37to get rid of this bug
01:24:38permanently
01:24:39it's something
01:24:39that we've been stuck
01:24:40with since world war one
01:24:41and this is our opportunity
01:24:43to finally fix it
01:24:44Mr. Kerr
01:24:45I'm not going to say
01:24:46that government solutions
01:24:48cause more confusion
01:24:49but
01:24:50you can imagine
01:24:52in this scenario
01:24:53that Florida
01:24:54is on
01:24:55daylight saving time
01:24:57Georgia right above
01:24:58it's on standard
01:24:59South Carolina
01:25:00is on daylight
01:25:01etc
01:25:01in the same spot
01:25:03because maybe
01:25:03special interests
01:25:04of all kinds
01:25:05made that happen
01:25:06so I already have
01:25:08problems
01:25:08remembering
01:25:09which state
01:25:10is in which time zone
01:25:11as it is right now
01:25:12sometimes
01:25:12the border states
01:25:13to add to that
01:25:14oh they're in central
01:25:15and they're on standard
01:25:16oh what time
01:25:17is it there exactly
01:25:18so I can see
01:25:19where this causes
01:25:20more confusion
01:25:21I wish I had
01:25:22a better answer
01:25:23for you on that one
01:25:24but could we adjust
01:25:26and figure that out
01:25:27quickly
01:25:27I don't know
01:25:28I see it as problematic
01:25:30but it may be
01:25:30the only way
01:25:31to thread the needle
01:25:32Dr. Johnson
01:25:33yeah I think
01:25:34you know
01:25:35the economy
01:25:35the transportation
01:25:37industry
01:25:37certainly needs
01:25:38consistency
01:25:39and alignment
01:25:40so we want
01:25:41to make this change
01:25:42once
01:25:42we don't want
01:25:43to pick
01:25:43something that's tried
01:25:45and been failed
01:25:45twice before
01:25:46such that we
01:25:47spend lots of money
01:25:48fixing it again
01:25:49in a few years
01:25:50you mentioned
01:25:51the economy
01:25:52which again
01:25:54you know
01:25:54is so important
01:25:55and you know
01:25:57the majority
01:25:57of our workers
01:25:58start work early
01:25:59the average work
01:26:00start time
01:26:01is 7.55
01:26:01in the morning
01:26:02so we'd be forcing
01:26:03people all winter
01:26:05to go to work
01:26:06in the dark
01:26:06really affecting
01:26:07their productivity
01:26:08and economics
01:26:10and so
01:26:12while you know
01:26:13certain businesses
01:26:14are going to have
01:26:15different you know
01:26:16benefits of the sun
01:26:18I actually do
01:26:20want to give sun
01:26:21to people
01:26:22when they use it
01:26:22when they use it
01:26:23to get up
01:26:24when they use it
01:26:24to be healthy
01:26:25when they use it
01:26:26to be more productive
01:26:27and efficient at work
01:26:28and to improve
01:26:29the overall economy
01:26:30not just
01:26:31niche
01:26:32you know
01:26:33businesses
01:26:34like the golf industry
01:26:35that have shown
01:26:36they can be
01:26:36very successful
01:26:37in standard time
01:26:38like in Arizona
01:26:38Dr. Harkey
01:26:40strictly speaking
01:26:42from a road safety
01:26:43perspective
01:26:43I'm not sure
01:26:44it would make
01:26:45any difference
01:26:45if states
01:26:46had the right
01:26:47to select the time
01:26:48because again
01:26:49it's about
01:26:50the amount of light
01:26:51the amount of ambient light
01:26:52during the times of travel
01:26:54and so
01:26:54I don't think
01:26:56it would have an impact
01:26:57personally
01:26:58it would probably
01:26:59confuse me
01:26:59but that's
01:27:01we had that problem
01:27:03I will give you
01:27:03a quick anecdote
01:27:04almost 40 years ago
01:27:06we were collecting
01:27:06speed data
01:27:07in New Mexico
01:27:08and Arizona
01:27:08as part of a research study
01:27:10had no idea
01:27:11at that time
01:27:12being right out of school
01:27:13hadn't really paid attention
01:27:14that Arizona
01:27:14did not bother
01:27:15to go to daylight savings times
01:27:17all of our equipment
01:27:18was an hour off
01:27:20when we went to pick up
01:27:21all the speed data
01:27:21and we had to adjust it
01:27:22after the fact
01:27:23and so
01:27:24I think you would have
01:27:25those kinds of things
01:27:26right
01:27:26that could work their way
01:27:27into the system
01:27:28unintentional mistakes
01:27:29if we were to get
01:27:31into a system
01:27:32where we had a lot
01:27:34of different
01:27:34time zones going on
01:27:35well I for one
01:27:37am thankful
01:27:38for these magic devices
01:27:39that we carry
01:27:40that when I land
01:27:41on a plane
01:27:41I look down
01:27:42to figure out
01:27:42what time it is
01:27:43because I'm on a lot
01:27:44of planes
01:27:45and it changes
01:27:46I want to thank
01:27:47each of the four of you
01:27:48this has been
01:27:48very helpful
01:27:49testimony
01:27:50and you all
01:27:51have different perspectives
01:27:52so each of you
01:27:53has added significantly
01:27:54to it
01:27:54senators will have
01:27:56until the close of business
01:27:57on Thursday
01:27:57April 17th
01:27:58to submit questions
01:27:59for the record
01:28:00the witnesses will have
01:28:01until the end of the day
01:28:02on Thursday May 1st
01:28:03to respond to those questions
01:28:05and this concludes
01:28:06today's hearing
01:28:07the committee stands adjourned

Recommended