During a Senate Finance Committee hearing last week, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) questioned Frank Bisignano, President Trump's nominee to be Commissioner of Social Security Administration, about recent remarks from the Trump administration on social security.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Bisognino, thank you so much for meeting with me.
00:08I appreciate it. Welcome. Congratulations on your nomination. Welcome to your
00:12family. Let me just get a couple of questions out of the way and hopefully we
00:18just have this candid conversation and we carry it through like we did in my
00:21office. Recently in an interview with Joe Rogan on February 28th, Elon Musk called
00:27Social Security the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time. Do you believe that Social
00:31Security is a Ponzi scheme? I believe it's a promise to pay. It's an 89-year
00:37institution so far. It will continue. Yes or no, do you think it's a Ponzi scheme?
00:43It's a promise to pay. In a podcast appearance last week, Commerce Secretary
00:50Howard Lutnick suggested that only fraudsters would complain about missing
00:53a Social Security check and that most people wouldn't mind if the government
00:56simply skipped a payment. Do you agree with Secretary Lutnick that only
01:00fraudsters complain when the government fails to send Social Security checks?
01:05I don't think anyone would appreciate not getting their Social Security check
01:11on time. I'm sorry, say that again. I said I think. I don't think anyone would
01:18appreciate not getting their Social Security check on time. So you would
01:21agree they're not fraudsters? I don't, I'm answering what you asked, so I think.
01:29Well that's the question is, his implication is if you're questioning
01:33whether you got your check or not, you're probably a fraudster. Would you agree
01:36with that? It'd be hard to get to that conclusion. Pardon me? It'd be hard to get to that
01:42conclusion. Okay, now let me ask you this as well. The Social Security, current
01:48Social Security administrator, briefly ended a contract that had allowed
01:52parents of newborn babies in Maine to sign their children up for Social
01:56Security number at the hospital. Instead, he required them to do so in person at
02:01an office. The current administrator, according to a New York Times article,
02:05said he had ordered the move after watching Governor Janet Mills clash
02:11with Mr. Trump at the White House. He then quickly reversed that decision but
02:16said he did it because he felt that the governor of Maine was not being real
02:21cordial to the president. Do you think Social Security should be used as a
02:26political weapon against individuals in the future? As I said in my opening
02:32comments, it's the most bipartisan thing we have. I believe its job is to deliver
02:38for the American population. I agree, but do you think it should be used as a
02:41political weapon at the whim of somebody who wants to show fealty to the
02:47president? I don't think it should be. Good, that's the right answer. It should
02:52not be because everything you've said up until now has agreed that we should get
02:56the benefits out to individuals, that we should ensure that our focus is making
03:01those that need this disability benefits or who worked hard their entire lives
03:06are entitled to these benefits really get them. So I appreciate that comment.
03:12Let me also jump back to a couple of questions. The Social Security
03:19Administrator, let me jump to this. More than 570,000 Nevadans rely on Social
03:26Security after paying into it for decades, yet they face long wait times
03:30and inaccessible offices. Problems that have only worsened under the so-called
03:34efficiency measures introduced by DOJ. DOJ has cut staff, they've closed field
03:40offices, and they've shifted services online. I'm hopeful that you are going to
03:46address this issue, and as you think about moving into this office, what are
03:52you going to do based on all of the complaints that we are hearing now?
03:55There are more so than before this administration came into office. How do
03:59you expect to, in the first hundred days, address these issues? I'm a battle-tested
04:04executive. In the mortgage crisis, when I was asked to come in and work shoulder
04:12to shoulder with the government, we figured out how to clean up a pretty big
04:16mess. And so would you reverse some of the DOJ's decisions if you felt that
04:20that was, they were inappropriate and they weren't getting to the beneficiaries,
04:24the information, the benefits they need? Any decision I thought was inappropriate
04:28would be revoked at all, all issues. And you'd be willing to reverse it? I'm sorry. And you
04:33would be willing to reverse it if you felt it was appropriate? If something
04:37was inappropriate, it would be changed. Thank you. And then finally, let me ask
04:41you this. There's a lot of concern, and rightfully so, about individuals who
04:45don't even work in the administration. They are actually rifling through the
04:50personal information of Americans. And I am hopeful that you are going to guard
04:56that personal information for anybody who has provided it to Social Security
05:00Administration. Are you willing to protect their private information? I've done it my
05:04whole career. That's yes? I've done it my whole career, that would be yes. Thank you.
05:10Thank you, Mr. Chairman.