• 3 days ago
During a Senate Banking Committee hearing last week, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) spoke about capital gains tax from home sales.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you so much. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you, Senator Gallego.
00:04Thank you, Mr. Chair. Ms. Willis, Arizona experienced significant population growth
00:07in recent years, which, as you know, brings unique housing challenges. Despite being the
00:11fifth largest city in the U.S., Phoenix receives about 7,400 vouchers, far fewer than Philadelphia,
00:16the sixth largest city, which receives over 22,000 vouchers. This is why I introduced the
00:21Housing Voucher Fairness Act to allocate additional housing choice vouchers in our
00:25fastest-growing cities, which assists families in affordable rental housing.
00:29Can you talk about the unique challenges that fast-growing cities face and solutions
00:33that you have seen actually work?
00:36Thank you for the question, and thank you for the Housing Voucher Fairness Act.
00:44So, we're happy to look into this issue, but I think it raises some significant issues,
00:50because right now, only one out of four eligible households for housing assistance really gets
00:58any help. The others have to essentially fend for themselves, and that's three out of four.
01:02And Congress certainly should be working to ensure that rental assistance is available
01:07universally to all eligible households.
01:12Well, thank you. And one of the things that we discovered, the reason why there is a disparity,
01:17is that the housing voucher allocation is based off the 2000 Census. So, if you're fast-growing
01:24cities like Houston, Dallas, Las Vegas, you're actually going to be disproportionately penalized
01:32for having good policies and growing, versus some of these older cities that are essentially
01:38atrophying, but yet we're being punished. So, even an update just on using the most recent
01:45census would actually be more accurate. And I hope that we'll be working on that legislation,
01:50too, and I hope my colleagues will help join us there.
01:53Sure. And if I can just add to that, too, and I think it is important you mentioned data,
01:59you know, in terms of the data that HUD collects, because we certainly do, again,
02:04going back to wanting to protect those programs and the staff at HUD, because, you know,
02:1276 percent in the office in HUD is being threatened to cut the staff there. And it is
02:20important to have that data to understand the housing issue and how we can correct it.
02:26Right. And one of the things, since we were talking about cuts, you know, we, Arizona's
02:30unique, one of the unique states where we have 22 federally recognized tribes, we have the largest
02:35tribal enrollment in the country, you know, lots of land, but, of course, we have a housing
02:39challenge. So, the firing, obviously, of and closing down of some of our Tribal Bureau of
02:45Indian Affairs offices makes things difficult, especially when we're trying to apply for
02:50housing grants for some of these tribal nations. So, I'm going to introduce as a record a letter
02:55that myself and Senator Kelly wrote about our opposition to the closing of this, of these
02:59offices, which, again, will exasperate a housing crisis that's actually on, people don't understand,
03:04we actually have a tribal, on tribal lands, even a housing crisis even there.
03:08I have another question, Mr. Glasser, and this is something that I've noticed, is that many
03:13Californians are moving to Arizona, and instead of downsizing their homes,
03:20right, they're selling a pretty valuable property for $1.5 million in California, and then they're
03:25just coming to Arizona, and they're buying nearly that amount. What is the, why are they doing that?
03:30Explain the tax implication of why they're doing that. Well, I think, you know, it's the,
03:36the, thank you, thank you, Senator, for that question. I think the, the appeal of Arizona
03:43should be obvious to anyone. Oh, great, I can go on and on. The, and certainly. But the reason
03:50they're selling their house at $1.2 million, and it's a paid off house, and instead of going and
03:56getting, you know, this retired couple, couple, you know, a man and a woman, partner, whatever it
04:02is, instead of going and getting a nice house, a condo, and pocketing the rest of the money,
04:06they're not doing that. They're buying a house almost of equivalent value. What is the reasoning
04:10for that? It's not a trick question. I could answer that. No, no, well, you know, the first
04:13order thing is you go to a place where housing is cheaper, you buy more house, right? We believe,
04:16as economists, that people respond to, respond to prices, and if price, if housing is cheaper,
04:20and, you know, you could easily, you wouldn't be surprised if you say they spent $1.8 million on
04:24the house, because they could get so much more house for their buck in Arizona than in California.
04:28All right, well, the reason also is because if that family sells that house,
04:36and they don't buy a house of equivalent or close to equivalent value, they're going to end up
04:40paying capital gains on that house. So a retired couple, instead of trying to just pay the government
04:47the money, which I actually agree with them, they shouldn't pay that, we should figure out a way to
04:51actually give them a capital gains tax cut, because what actually ends up happening is that then they
04:56would come to Arizona, buy a smaller place, and then they could keep that money, that capital
05:01gains, for their own retirement. Instead, what they're doing is they're buying an equivalent
05:06house to at least keep some value. And so I, one of the things I'd love to think about is, like,
05:10how are we, you know, basically incentivizing these well-to-do retirees into buying houses
05:17that they don't necessarily need to buy, because that's the only thing that actually brings up
05:20some level of economic value and stability. So with that, I apologize, Mr. Chair, because I
05:23complained about going over time, and I yield back my time.
05:28Sounds like an opportunity for us to work together, and the TCJA is really increasing the

Recommended