• last year
During debate on the House floor, Rep. Mike Garcia (R-CA) spoke in support of HR 8997, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I'm proud to support this very solid Energy and Water Development
00:07and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2025. It's a good bill. It's going to secure
00:12our nuclear triad, it's going to protect our domestic energy supplies, and it's going to
00:17pressure this Biden administration to refill our strategic petroleum reserves. And I want
00:21to thank Chairman Kohl, and especially Chairman Fleischman, as well as the committee staff
00:25for their hard work on this bill in pulling this forward to the floor. I'm particularly
00:31satisfied that this legislation includes my provision to block a rule that was established
00:36by the Department of Energy to actually weaken environmental oversight for battery electric
00:43storage systems, or BESS facilities, or BESS facilities. These BESS sites are essentially
00:51giant lithium batteries lined up side by side and stacked on top of each other in many
00:56cases and connected to the larger power grid. And they're not necessarily, Mr. Speaker,
01:01bad things. But while energy storage systems are essential for a modern power grid, especially
01:06in areas like in my district in Southern California where we have high winds and high fire risks
01:11and high loads, they also, these BESS facilities, could potentially pose dangers for communities
01:18if not properly planned, if not properly engineered and constructed, and if put in
01:22locations that pose significant harm to our communities and our environment. In a recent
01:28hearing, the San Bernardino County Fire Chief testified that if these BESS sites are not
01:33perfectly constructed, they can actually create fires that are extremely and almost impossible
01:39to extinguish. My provision simply says that the Department of Energy needs to stop trying
01:46to cut corners and to do the homework before installing these energy storage systems in
01:51our communities. Let me be clear. This isn't an anti-storage provision. It's a provision
01:56to ensure that the communities have a voice and that the government isn't running with
02:01scissors during the development of these facilities. And I can tell you, in L.A. County, they've
02:05made some very bad choices recently when it comes to these BESS facilities. You don't
02:10have to look any further than the community of Acton, right in the middle of my district,
02:15to understand the risks associated with rushing these energy storage projects. Acton is a
02:21small community, Mr. Speaker, right in the middle of the Los Angeles forest where L.A.
02:27County is forcing, effectively, this BESS facility to be constructed. Let me paint the
02:32picture of where this location is at. In their infinite wisdom, L.A. County decided to put
02:37this BESS facility smack dab on top of the most active part of the San Andreas Fault.
02:43It's right in the middle of some of the most combustible wildlands and poses a significant
02:47wildfire risk. Within a PAR 5 of this location, there's a large electrical substation that
02:54would be basically knocked out, which supplies all of the power to L.A. County, or most of
02:59the power to L.A. County, if this were to have any issues. Within a PAR 5, it's got
03:05a freeway that is the main corridor going to the high desert. It's got a railroad. It's
03:09got a reservoir, which is a drinking water for the high desert in about a third of my
03:13district. It's got high-voltage power transmission lines going overhead, so if the facility catches
03:18on fire, those will be knocked out. And it's got a Brightline West plan nearby, a new rail
03:25line as well as California's high-speed rail, right by this BESS facility in L.A. County.
03:31And in the end, the community had no input. They had no voice. The government was running
03:35with scissors, and the L.A. County officials were able to put this BESS facility in a location
03:41that, frankly, is probably the absolute worst location that they could have chosen. So again,
03:46I want to thank the chairman for this good bill overall. It does a lot of amazing things,
03:50and I especially want to make sure that I want to reiterate that these battery storage
03:55facilities are good, they're necessary, but they need to be done right, and we can't be
03:59cutting corners on these very unique technologies. And I urge my colleagues to support the overlying
04:04goal. Thank you. I yield back.

Recommended